Controlling fps with requestAnimationFrame?

How to throttle requestAnimationFrame to a specific frame rate

Demo throttling at 5 FPS: http://jsfiddle.net/m1erickson/CtsY3/

This method works by testing the elapsed time since executing the last frame loop.

Your drawing code executes only when your specified FPS interval has elapsed.

The first part of the code sets some variables used to calculate elapsed time.

var stop = false;
var frameCount = 0;
var $results = $("#results");
var fps, fpsInterval, startTime, now, then, elapsed;


// initialize the timer variables and start the animation

function startAnimating(fps) {
    fpsInterval = 1000 / fps;
    then = Date.now();
    startTime = then;
    animate();
}

And this code is the actual requestAnimationFrame loop which draws at your specified FPS.

// the animation loop calculates time elapsed since the last loop
// and only draws if your specified fps interval is achieved

function animate() {

    // request another frame

    requestAnimationFrame(animate);

    // calc elapsed time since last loop

    now = Date.now();
    elapsed = now - then;

    // if enough time has elapsed, draw the next frame

    if (elapsed > fpsInterval) {

        // Get ready for next frame by setting then=now, but also adjust for your
        // specified fpsInterval not being a multiple of RAF's interval (16.7ms)
        then = now - (elapsed % fpsInterval);

        // Put your drawing code here

    }
}

---

Update 2016/6

The problem throttling the frame rate is that the screen has a constant update rate, typically 60 FPS.

If we want 24 FPS we will never get the true 24 fps on the screen, we can time it as such but not show it as the monitor can only show synced frames at 15 fps, 30 fps or 60 fps (some monitors also 120 fps).

However, for timing purposes we can calculate and update when possible.

You can build all the logic for controlling the frame-rate by encapsulating calculations and callbacks into an object:

function FpsCtrl(fps, callback) {

    var delay = 1000 / fps,                               // calc. time per frame
        time = null,                                      // start time
        frame = -1,                                       // frame count
        tref;                                             // rAF time reference

    function loop(timestamp) {
        if (time === null) time = timestamp;              // init start time
        var seg = Math.floor((timestamp - time) / delay); // calc frame no.
        if (seg > frame) {                                // moved to next frame?
            frame = seg;                                  // update
            callback({                                    // callback function
                time: timestamp,
                frame: frame
            })
        }
        tref = requestAnimationFrame(loop)
    }
}

Then add some controller and configuration code:

// play status
this.isPlaying = false;

// set frame-rate
this.frameRate = function(newfps) {
    if (!arguments.length) return fps;
    fps = newfps;
    delay = 1000 / fps;
    frame = -1;
    time = null;
};

// enable starting/pausing of the object
this.start = function() {
    if (!this.isPlaying) {
        this.isPlaying = true;
        tref = requestAnimationFrame(loop);
    }
};

this.pause = function() {
    if (this.isPlaying) {
        cancelAnimationFrame(tref);
        this.isPlaying = false;
        time = null;
        frame = -1;
    }
};

Usage

It becomes very simple - now, all that we have to do is to create an instance by setting callback function and desired frame rate just like this:

var fc = new FpsCtrl(24, function(e) {
     // render each frame here
  });

Then start (which could be the default behavior if desired):

fc.start();

That's it, all the logic is handled internally.

Demo

var ctx = c.getContext("2d"), pTime = 0, mTime = 0, x = 0; ctx.font = "20px sans-serif"; // update canvas with some information and animation var fps = new FpsCtrl(12, function(e) { ctx.clearRect(0, 0, c.width, c.height); ctx.fillText("FPS: " + fps.frameRate() + " Frame: " + e.frame + " Time: " + (e.time - pTime).toFixed(1), 4, 30); pTime = e.time; var x = (pTime - mTime) * 0.1; if (x > c.width) mTime = pTime; ctx.fillRect(x, 50, 10, 10) }) // start the loop fps.start(); // UI bState.onclick = function() { fps.isPlaying ? fps.pause() : fps.start(); }; sFPS.onchange = function() { fps.frameRate(+this.value) }; function FpsCtrl(fps, callback) { var delay = 1000 / fps, time = null, frame = -1, tref; function loop(timestamp) { if (time === null) time = timestamp; var seg = Math.floor((timestamp - time) / delay); if (seg > frame) { frame = seg; callback({ time: timestamp, frame: frame }) } tref = requestAnimationFrame(loop) } this.isPlaying = false; this.frameRate = function(newfps) { if (!arguments.length) return fps; fps = newfps; delay = 1000 / fps; frame = -1; time = null; }; this.start = function() { if (!this.isPlaying) { this.isPlaying = true; tref = requestAnimationFrame(loop); } }; this.pause = function() { if (this.isPlaying) { cancelAnimationFrame(tref); this.isPlaying = false; time = null; frame = -1; } }; } body {font:16px sans-serif} Framerate: 12 15 24 25 29.97 30 60

Start/Stop

Old answer

The main purpose of requestAnimationFrame is to sync updates to the monitor's refresh rate. This will require you to animate at the FPS of the monitor or a factor of it (ie. 60, 30, 15 FPS for a typical refresh rate @ 60 Hz).

If you want a more arbitrary FPS then there is no point using rAF as the frame rate will never match the monitor's update frequency anyways (just a frame here and there) which simply cannot give you a smooth animation (as with all frame re-timings) and you can might as well use setTimeout or setInterval instead.

This is also a well known problem in the professional video industry when you want to playback a video at a different FPS then the device showing it refresh at. Many techniques has been used such as frame blending and complex re-timing re-building intermediate frames based on motion vectors, but with canvas these techniques are not available and the result will always be jerky video.

var FPS = 24;  /// "silver screen"
var isPlaying = true;

function loop() {
    if (isPlaying) setTimeout(loop, 1000 / FPS);

    ... code for frame here
}

The reason why we place setTimeout first (and why some place rAF first when a poly-fill is used) is that this will be more accurate as the setTimeout will queue an event immediately when the loop starts so that no matter how much time the remaining code will use (provided it doesn't exceed the timeout interval) the next call will be at the interval it represents (for pure rAF this is not essential as rAF will try to jump onto the next frame in any case).

Also worth to note that placing it first will also risk calls stacking up as with setInterval. setInterval may be slightly more accurate for this use.

And you can use setInterval instead outside the loop to do the same.

var FPS = 29.97;   /// NTSC
var rememberMe = setInterval(loop, 1000 / FPS);

function loop() {

    ... code for frame here
}

And to stop the loop:

clearInterval(rememberMe);

In order to reduce frame rate when the tab gets blurred you can add a factor like this:

var isFocus = 1;
var FPS = 25;

function loop() {
    setTimeout(loop, 1000 / (isFocus * FPS)); /// note the change here

    ... code for frame here
}

window.onblur = function() {
    isFocus = 0.5; /// reduce FPS to half   
}

window.onfocus = function() {
    isFocus = 1; /// full FPS
}

This way you can reduce the FPS to 1/4 etc.

---

I suggest wrapping your call to requestAnimationFrame in a setTimeout:

const fps = 25;
function animate() {
  // perform some animation task here

  setTimeout(() => {
    requestAnimationFrame(animate);
  }, 1000 / fps);
}
animate();

You need to call requestAnimationFrame from within setTimeout, rather than the other way around, because requestAnimationFrame schedules your function to run right before the next repaint, and if you delay your update further using setTimeout you will have missed that time window. However, doing the reverse is sound, since you’re simply waiting a period of time before making the request.

---

These are all good ideas in theory, until you go deep. The problem is you can't throttle an RAF without de-synchronizing it, defeating it's very purpose for existing. So you let it run at full-speed, and update your data in a separate loop, or even a separate thread!

Yes, I said it. You can do multi-threaded JavaScript in the browser!

There are two methods I know that work extremely well without jank, using far less juice and creating less heat. Accurate human-scale timing and machine efficiency are the net result.

Apologies if this is a little wordy, but here goes...

Method 1: Update data via setInterval, and graphics via RAF.

Use a separate setInterval for updating translation and rotation values, physics, collisions, etc. Keep those values in an object for each animated element. Assign the transform string to a variable in the object each setInterval 'frame'. Keep these objects in an array. Set your interval to your desired fps in ms: ms=(1000/fps). This keeps a steady clock that allows the same fps on any device, regardless of RAF speed. Do not assign the transforms to the elements here!

In a requestAnimationFrame loop, iterate through your array with an old-school for loop-- do not use the newer forms here, they are slow!

for(var i=0; i<sprite.length-1; i++){  rafUpdate(sprite[i]);  }

In your rafUpdate function, get the transform string from your js object in the array, and its elements id. You should already have your 'sprite' elements attached to a variable or easily accessible through other means so you don't lose time 'get'-ing them in the RAF. Keeping them in an object named after their html id's works pretty good. Set that part up before it even goes into your SI or RAF.

Use the RAF to update your transforms only, use only 3D transforms (even for 2d), and set css "will-change: transform;" on elements that will change. This keeps your transforms synced to the native refresh rate as much as possible, kicks in the GPU, and tells the browser where to concentrate most.

So you should have something like this pseudocode...

// refs to elements to be transformed, kept in an array
var element = [
   mario: document.getElementById('mario'),
   luigi: document.getElementById('luigi')
   //...etc.
]

var sprite = [  // read/write this with SI.  read-only from RAF
   mario: { id: mario  ....physics data, id, and updated transform string (from SI) here  },
   luigi: {  id: luigi  .....same  }
   //...and so forth
] // also kept in an array (for efficient iteration)

//update one sprite js object
//data manipulation, CPU tasks for each sprite object
//(physics, collisions, and transform-string updates here.)
//pass the object (by reference).
var SIupdate = function(object){
  // get pos/rot and update with movement
  object.pos.x += object.mov.pos.x;  // example, motion along x axis
  // and so on for y and z movement
  // and xyz rotational motion, scripted scaling etc

  // build transform string ie
  object.transform =
   'translate3d('+
     object.pos.x+','+
     object.pos.y+','+
     object.pos.z+
   ') '+

   // assign rotations, order depends on purpose and set-up. 
   'rotationZ('+object.rot.z+') '+
   'rotationY('+object.rot.y+') '+
   'rotationX('+object.rot.x+') '+

   'scale3d('.... if desired
  ;  //...etc.  include 
}


var fps = 30; //desired controlled frame-rate


// CPU TASKS - SI psuedo-frame data manipulation
setInterval(function(){
  // update each objects data
  for(var i=0; i<sprite.length-1; i++){  SIupdate(sprite[i]);  }
},1000/fps); //  note ms = 1000/fps


// GPU TASKS - RAF callback, real frame graphics updates only
var rAf = function(){
  // update each objects graphics
  for(var i=0; i<sprite.length-1; i++){  rAF.update(sprite[i])  }
  window.requestAnimationFrame(rAF); // loop
}

// assign new transform to sprite's element, only if it's transform has changed.
rAF.update = function(object){     
  if(object.old_transform !== object.transform){
    element[object.id].style.transform = transform;
    object.old_transform = object.transform;
  }
} 

window.requestAnimationFrame(rAF); // begin RAF

This keeps your updates to the data objects and transform strings synced to desired 'frame' rate in the SI, and the actual transform assignments in the RAF synced to GPU refresh rate. So the actual graphics updates are only in the RAF, but the changes to the data, and building the transform string are in the SI, thus no jankies but 'time' flows at desired frame-rate.

Flow:

[setup js sprite objects and html element object references]

[setup RAF and SI single-object update functions]

[start SI at percieved/ideal frame-rate]
  [iterate through js objects, update data transform string for each]
  [loop back to SI]

[start RAF loop]
  [iterate through js objects, read object's transform string and assign it to it's html element]
  [loop back to RAF]

Method 2. Put the SI in a web-worker. This one is FAAAST and smooth!

Same as method 1, but put the SI in web-worker. It'll run on a totally separate thread then, leaving the page to deal only with the RAF and UI. Pass the sprite array back and forth as a 'transferable object'. This is buko fast. It does not take time to clone or serialize, but it's not like passing by reference in that the reference from the other side is destroyed, so you will need to have both sides pass to the other side, and only update them when present, sort of like passing a note back and forth with your girlfriend in high-school.

Only one can read and write at a time. This is fine so long as they check if it's not undefined to avoid an error. The RAF is FAST and will kick it back immediately, then go through a bunch of GPU frames just checking if it's been sent back yet. The SI in the web-worker will have the sprite array most of the time, and will update positional, movement and physics data, as well as creating the new transform string, then pass it back to the RAF in the page.

This is the fastest way I know to animate elements via script. The two functions will be running as two separate programs, on two separate threads, taking advantage of multi-core CPU's in a way that a single js script does not. Multi-threaded javascript animation.

And it will do so smoothly without jank, but at the actual specified frame-rate, with very little divergence.

Result:

Either of these two methods will ensure your script will run at the same speed on any PC, phone, tablet, etc (within the capabilities of the device and the browser, of course).

---

How to easily throttle to a specific FPS:

// timestamps are ms passed since document creation.
// lastTimestamp can be initialized to 0, if main loop is executed immediately
var lastTimestamp = 0,
    maxFPS = 30,
    timestep = 1000 / maxFPS; // ms for each frame

function main(timestamp) {
    window.requestAnimationFrame(main);

    // skip if timestep ms hasn't passed since last frame
    if (timestamp - lastTimestamp < timestep) return;

    lastTimestamp = timestamp;

    // draw frame here
}

window.requestAnimationFrame(main);

Source: A Detailed Explanation of JavaScript Game Loops and Timing by Isaac Sukin

---

var time = 0;
var time_framerate = 1000; //in milliseconds

function animate(timestamp) {
  if(timestamp > time + time_framerate) {
    time = timestamp;    

    //your code
  }

  window.requestAnimationFrame(animate);
}

---

The simplest way

note: It might behave differently on different screens with different frame rate.

const FPS = 30;
let lastTimestamp = 0;


function update(timestamp) {
  requestAnimationFrame(update);
  if (timestamp - lastTimestamp < 1000 / FPS) return;
  
  
   /* <<< PUT YOUR CODE HERE >>>  */

 
  lastTimestamp = timestamp;
}


update();

---

A simple solution to this problem is to return from the render loop if the frame is not required to render:

const FPS = 60;
let prevTick = 0;    

function render() 
{
    requestAnimationFrame(render);

    // clamp to fixed framerate
    let now = Math.round(FPS * Date.now() / 1000);
    if (now == prevTick) return;
    prevTick = now;

    // otherwise, do your stuff ...
}

It's important to know that requestAnimationFrame depends on the users monitor refresh rate (vsync). So, relying on requestAnimationFrame for game speed for example will make it unplayable on 200Hz monitors if you're not using a separate timer mechanism in your simulation.

---

Skipping requestAnimationFrame cause not smooth(desired) animation at custom fps.

// Input/output DOM elements var $results = $("#results"); var $fps = $("#fps"); var $period = $("#period"); // Array of FPS samples for graphing // Animation state/parameters var fpsInterval, lastDrawTime, frameCount_timed, frameCount, lastSampleTime, currentFps=0, currentFps_timed=0; var intervalID, requestID; // Setup canvas being animated var canvas = document.getElementById("c"); var canvas_timed = document.getElementById("c2"); canvas_timed.width = canvas.width = 300; canvas_timed.height = canvas.height = 300; var ctx = canvas.getContext("2d"); var ctx2 = canvas_timed.getContext("2d"); // Setup input event handlers $fps.on('click change keyup', function() { if (this.value > 0) { fpsInterval = 1000 / +this.value; } }); $period.on('click change keyup', function() { if (this.value > 0) { if (intervalID) { clearInterval(intervalID); } intervalID = setInterval(sampleFps, +this.value); } }); function startAnimating(fps, sampleFreq) { ctx.fillStyle = ctx2.fillStyle = "#000"; ctx.fillRect(0, 0, canvas.width, canvas.height); ctx2.fillRect(0, 0, canvas.width, canvas.height); ctx2.font = ctx.font = "32px sans"; fpsInterval = 1000 / fps; lastDrawTime = performance.now(); lastSampleTime = lastDrawTime; frameCount = 0; frameCount_timed = 0; animate(); intervalID = setInterval(sampleFps, sampleFreq); animate_timed() } function sampleFps() { // sample FPS var now = performance.now(); if (frameCount > 0) { currentFps = (frameCount / (now - lastSampleTime) * 1000).toFixed(2); currentFps_timed = (frameCount_timed / (now - lastSampleTime) * 1000).toFixed(2); $results.text(currentFps + " | " + currentFps_timed); frameCount = 0; frameCount_timed = 0; } lastSampleTime = now; } function drawNextFrame(now, canvas, ctx, fpsCount) { // Just draw an oscillating seconds-hand var length = Math.min(canvas.width, canvas.height) / 2.1; var step = 15000; var theta = (now % step) / step * 2 * Math.PI; var xCenter = canvas.width / 2; var yCenter = canvas.height / 2; var x = xCenter + length * Math.cos(theta); var y = yCenter + length * Math.sin(theta); ctx.beginPath(); ctx.moveTo(xCenter, yCenter); ctx.lineTo(x, y); ctx.fillStyle = ctx.strokeStyle = 'white'; ctx.stroke(); var theta2 = theta + 3.14/6; ctx.beginPath(); ctx.moveTo(xCenter, yCenter); ctx.lineTo(x, y); ctx.arc(xCenter, yCenter, length*2, theta, theta2); ctx.fillStyle = "rgba(0,0,0,.1)" ctx.fill(); ctx.fillStyle = "#000"; ctx.fillRect(0,0,100,30); ctx.fillStyle = "#080"; ctx.fillText(fpsCount,10,30); } // redraw second canvas each fpsInterval (1000/fps) function animate_timed() { frameCount_timed++; drawNextFrame( performance.now(), canvas_timed, ctx2, currentFps_timed); setTimeout(animate_timed, fpsInterval); } function animate(now) { // request another frame requestAnimationFrame(animate); // calc elapsed time since last loop var elapsed = now - lastDrawTime; // if enough time has elapsed, draw the next frame if (elapsed > fpsInterval) { // Get ready for next frame by setting lastDrawTime=now, but... // Also, adjust for fpsInterval not being multiple of 16.67 lastDrawTime = now - (elapsed % fpsInterval); frameCount++; drawNextFrame(now, canvas, ctx, currentFps); } } startAnimating(+$fps.val(), +$period.val()); input{ width:100px; } #tvs{ color:red; padding:0px 25px; } H3{ font-weight:400; }

requestAnimationFrame skipping vs. setTimeout() redraw

Original code by @tavnab.

---

I always do it this very simple way without messing with timestamps:

let fps, eachNthFrame, frameCount;

fps = 30;

//This variable specifies how many frames should be skipped.
//If it is 1 then no frames are skipped. If it is 2, one frame 
//is skipped so "eachSecondFrame" is renderd.
eachNthFrame = Math.round((1000 / fps) / 16.66);

//This variable is the number of the current frame. It is set to eachNthFrame so that the 
//first frame will be renderd.
frameCount = eachNthFrame;

requestAnimationFrame(frame);

//I think the rest is self-explanatory
function frame() {
  if (frameCount === eachNthFrame) {
    frameCount = 0;
    animate();
  }
  frameCount++;
  requestAnimationFrame(frame);
}

---

For throttling FPS to any value, pls see jdmayfields answer. However, for a very quick and easy solution to halve your frame rate, you can simply do your computations only every 2nd frame by:

requestAnimationFrame(render);
function render() {
  // ... computations ...
  requestAnimationFrame(skipFrame);
}
function skipFrame() { requestAnimationFrame(render); }

Similarly you could always call render but use a variable to control whether you do computations this time or not, allowing you to also cut FPS to a third or fourth (in my case, for a schematic webgl-animation 20fps is still enough while considerably lowering computational load on the clients)

---

I tried multiple solutions provided on this question. Even though the solutions work as expected, they result in not so professional output.

Based on my personal experience, I would highly recommend not to control FPS on the browser side, especially using requestAnimationFrame. Because, when you do that, it'll make the frame rendering experience very choppy, users will clearly see the frames jumping and finally, it won't look real or professional at all.

So, my advice would be to control the FPS from the server side at the time of sending itself and simply render the frames as soon as you receive them on the browser side.

Note: if you still want to control on the client-side, try avoiding usage of setTimeout or Date object in your logic of controlling fps. Because, when the FPS is high, these will introduce their own delay in terms of event loops or object creations.

---

Here is an idea to reach desired fps:

detect browser's animationFrameRate (typically 60fps) build a bitSet, according to animationFrameRate and your disiredFrameRate (say 24fps) lookup bitSet and conditionally "continue" the animation frame loop

It uses requestAnimationFrame so the actual frame rate won't be greater than animationFrameRate. you may adjust disiredFrameRate according to animationFrameRate.

I wrote a mini lib, and a canvas animation demo.

function filterNums(nums, jitter = 0.2, downJitter = 1 - 1 / (1 + jitter)) { let len = nums.length; let mid = Math.floor(len % 2 === 0 ? len / 2 : (len - 1) / 2), low = mid, high = mid; let lower = true, higher = true; let sum = nums[mid], count = 1; for (let i = 1, j, num; i <= mid; i += 1) { if (higher) { j = mid + i; if (j === len) break; num = nums[j]; if (num < (sum / count) * (1 + jitter)) { sum += num; count += 1; high = j; } else { higher = false; } } if (lower) { j = mid - i; num = nums[j]; if (num > (sum / count) * (1 - downJitter)) { sum += num; count += 1; low = j; } else { lower = false; } } } return nums.slice(low, high + 1); } function snapToOrRound(n, values, distance = 3) { for (let i = 0, v; i < values.length; i += 1) { v = values[i]; if (n >= v - distance && n <= v + distance) { return v; } } return Math.round(n); } function detectAnimationFrameRate(numIntervals = 6) { if (typeof numIntervals !== 'number' || !isFinite(numIntervals) || numIntervals < 2) { throw new RangeError('Argument numIntervals should be a number not less than 2'); } return new Promise((resolve) => { let num = Math.floor(numIntervals); let numFrames = num + 1; let last; let intervals = []; let i = 0; let tick = () => { let now = performance.now(); i += 1; if (i < numFrames) { requestAnimationFrame(tick); } if (i === 1) { last = now; } else { intervals.push(now - last); last = now; if (i === numFrames) { let compareFn = (a, b) => a < b ? -1 : a > b ? 1 : 0; let sortedIntervals = intervals.slice().sort(compareFn); let selectedIntervals = filterNums(sortedIntervals, 0.2, 0.1); let selectedDuration = selectedIntervals.reduce((s, n) => s + n, 0); let seletedFrameRate = 1000 / (selectedDuration / selectedIntervals.length); let finalFrameRate = snapToOrRound(seletedFrameRate, [60, 120, 90, 30], 5); resolve(finalFrameRate); } } }; requestAnimationFrame(() => { requestAnimationFrame(tick); }); }); } function buildFrameBitSet(animationFrameRate, desiredFrameRate){ let bitSet = new Uint8Array(animationFrameRate); let ratio = desiredFrameRate / animationFrameRate; if(ratio >= 1) return bitSet.fill(1); for(let i = 0, prev = -1, curr; i < animationFrameRate; i += 1, prev = curr){ curr = Math.floor(i * ratio); bitSet[i] = (curr !== prev) ? 1 : 0; } return bitSet; } let $ = (s, c = document) => c.querySelector(s); let $$ = (s, c = document) => Array.prototype.slice.call(c.querySelectorAll(s)); async function main(){ let canvas = $('#digitalClock'); let context2d = canvas.getContext('2d'); await new Promise((resolve) => { if(window.requestIdleCallback){ requestIdleCallback(resolve, {timeout:3000}); }else{ setTimeout(resolve, 0, {didTimeout: false}); } }); let animationFrameRate = await detectAnimationFrameRate(10); // 1. detect animation frame rate let desiredFrameRate = 24; let frameBits = buildFrameBitSet(animationFrameRate, desiredFrameRate); // 2. build a bit set let handle; let i = 0; let count = 0, then, actualFrameRate = $('#actualFrameRate'); // debug-only let draw = () => { if(++i >= animationFrameRate){ // shoud use === if frameBits don't change dynamically i = 0; /* debug-only */ let now = performance.now(); let deltaT = now - then; let fps = 1000 / (deltaT / count); actualFrameRate.textContent = fps; then = now; count = 0; } if(frameBits[i] === 0){ // 3. lookup the bit set handle = requestAnimationFrame(draw); return; } count += 1; // debug-only let d = new Date(); let text = d.getHours().toString().padStart(2, '0') + ':' + d.getMinutes().toString().padStart(2, '0') + ':' + d.getSeconds().toString().padStart(2, '0') + '.' + (d.getMilliseconds() / 10).toFixed(0).padStart(2, '0'); context2d.fillStyle = '#000000'; context2d.fillRect(0, 0, canvas.width, canvas.height); context2d.font = '36px monospace'; context2d.fillStyle = '#ffffff'; context2d.fillText(text, 0, 36); handle = requestAnimationFrame(draw); }; handle = requestAnimationFrame(() => { then = performance.now(); handle = requestAnimationFrame(draw); }); /* debug-only */ $('#animationFrameRate').textContent = animationFrameRate; let frameRateInput = $('#frameRateInput'); let frameRateOutput = $('#frameRateOutput'); frameRateInput.addEventListener('input', (e) => { frameRateOutput.value = e.target.value; }); frameRateInput.max = animationFrameRate; frameRateOutput.value = frameRateOutput.value = desiredFrameRate; frameRateInput.addEventListener('change', (e) => { desiredFrameRate = +e.target.value; frameBits = buildFrameBitSet(animationFrameRate, desiredFrameRate); }); } document.addEventListener('DOMContentLoaded', main);

---

Simplified explanation of earlier answer. At least if you want real-time, accurate throttling without the janks, or dropping frames like bombs. GPU and CPU friendly.

setInterval and setTimeout are both CPU-oriented, not GPU.

requestAnimationFrame is purely GPU-oriented.

Run them separately. It's simple and not janky. In your setInterval, update your math and create a little CSS script in a string. With your RAF loop, only use that script to update the new coordinates of your elements. Don't do anything else in the RAF loop.

The RAF is tied inherently to the GPU. Whenever the script does not change (i.e. because the SI is running a gazillion times slower), Chromium-based browsers know they do not need to do anything, because there are no changes. So the on-the-fly script created each "frame", say 60 times per second, is still the same for say 1000 RAF GPU frames, but it knows nothing has changed, and the net result is it wastes no energy on this. If you check in DevTools, you will see your GPU frame-rate registers at the rate delineated by the setInterval.

Truely, it is just that simple. Separate them, and they will cooperate.

No jankies.

---

Here's a good explanation I found: CreativeJS.com, to wrap a setTimeou) call inside the function passed to requestAnimationFrame. My concern with a "plain" requestionAnimationFrame would be, "what if I only want it to animate three times a second?" Even with requestAnimationFrame (as opposed to setTimeout) is that it still wastes (some) amount of "energy" (meaning that the Browser code is doing something, and possibly slowing the system down) 60 or 120 or however many times a second, as opposed to only two or three times a second (as you might want).

Most of the time I run my browsers with JavaScript intentially off for just this reason. But, I'm using Yosemite 10.10.3, and I think there's some kind of timer problem with it - at least on my old system (relatively old - meaning 2011).

---