ChatGPT解决这个技术问题 Extra ChatGPT

Is there any way I can define a variable in LaTeX?

In LaTeX, how can I define a string variable whose content is used instead of the variable in the compiled PDF?

Let's say I'm writing a tech doc on a software and I want to define the package name in the preamble or somewhere so that if its name changes, I don't have to replace it in a lot of places but only in one place.

For huge content, it is worth to mention \savebox (en.wikibooks.org/wiki/LaTeX/Boxes#savebox).

W
Werner

add the following to you preamble:

\newcommand{\newCommandName}{text to insert}

Then you can just use \newCommandName{} in the text

For more info on \newcommand, see e.g. wikibooks

Example:

\documentclass{article}
\newcommand\x{30}
\begin{document}
\x
\end{document}

Output:

30

@DiAlex be careful when omitting the curly braces, as it will interfere with white space after the inserted text. See this question.
I can't get this to work properly with non-ascii characters. Any ideas?
That's not a good answer. The command will evaluate when it is called, not when it is defined. So this is not a variable in a traditional language sense. If the command never gets called, the "body" of the command will never evaluate and if the command is called twice, the "body" will be evaluated twice.
Very upvoted, and it certainly serves the OP's purpose. But it is not really a variable.
Works, but compiler prints an error message: "Undefined control sequence". Is there a way to fix that?
p
plaes

Use \def command:

\def \variable {Something that's better to use as a variable}

Be aware that \def overrides preexisting macros without any warnings and therefore can cause various subtle errors. To overcome this either use namespaced variables like my_var or fall back to \newcommand, \renewcommand commands instead.


Using \def can be problematic as it does not check for preexisting macros. See the second circle of LaTeX hell – as such, it is preferable to use \newcommand
Thanks @RyanAtallah added note about that. Though, doesn't the meaning of variable mean that it's liable to change? :)
@plaes You're right, but that still doesn't mean you want to use \def. Instead, I think it's best practice to first "initialize" all variables that you want to use with \newcommand (even if it's just with \@empty), and then create your command to modify the variable using \renewcommand. This will let you know if your variable already exits, because \newcommand will throw an error (or at least a warning).
Note that \def works for things in math mode, while \newCommandName does not. (E.g., \def\mathExpression{\pi^2 + \sin x})
using underscore messes up the drawing I had to do myVar
d
dmckee --- ex-moderator kitten

For variables describing distances, you would use \newlength (and manipulate the values with \setlength, \addlength, \settoheight, \settolength and \settodepth).

Similarly you have access to \newcounter for things like section and figure numbers which should increment throughout the document. I've used this one in the past to provide code samples that were numbered separatly of other figures...

Also of note is \makebox which allows you to store a bit of laid-out document for later re-use (and for use with \settolength...).


Simple usage example like \newlength{\hcolw} and \setlength{\hcolw}{0.47\textwidth} would be useful.
F
Fran

If you want to use \newcommand, you can also include \usepackage{xspace} and define command by \newcommand{\newCommandName}{text to insert\xspace}. This can allow you to just use \newCommandName rather than \newCommandName{}.

For more detail, http://www.math.tamu.edu/~harold.boas/courses/math696/why-macros.html


R
Roald Nefs

I think you probably want to use a token list for this purpose: to set up the token list \newtoks\packagename to assign the name: \packagename={New Name for the package} to put the name into your output: \the\packagename.


V
Vineetha Vijayan

This works for me: \newcommand{\variablename}{the text}

For eg: \newcommand\m{100}

So when you type " \m\ is my mark " in the source code,

the pdf output displays as :

100 is my mark


duplication of existing answer with no info gain.
This is not a duplication. As I already mentioned that 'This works for me'