ChatGPT解决这个技术问题 Extra ChatGPT

Calling async method synchronously

I have an async method:

public async Task<string> GenerateCodeAsync()
{
    string code = await GenerateCodeService.GenerateCodeAsync();
    return code;
}

I need to call this method from a synchronous method.

How can I do this without having to duplicate the GenerateCodeAsync method in order for this to work synchronously?

Update

Yet no reasonable solution found.

However, I see that HttpClient already implements this pattern

using (HttpClient client = new HttpClient())
{
    // async
    HttpResponseMessage responseAsync = await client.GetAsync(url);

    // sync
    HttpResponseMessage responseSync = client.GetAsync(url).Result;
}
I was hoping for a simpler solution, thinking that asp.net handled this much easier than writing so many lines of code
Why don't just embrace async code? Ideally you'd want more async code, not less.
[Why don't just embrace async code?] Ha, it may be precisely because one is embracing async code that they need this solution as large parts of the project get converted! You cannot rebuild Rome in a day.
@NicholasPetersen sometimes 3rd-party library can force you to do this. Example building dynammic messages in WithMessage method out of FluentValidation. There is no async API for this due to library design - WithMessage overloads are static. Other methods of passing dynamic arguments to WithMessage are strange.

R
Reyan Chougle

You can access the Result property of the task, which will cause your thread to block until the result is available:

string code = GenerateCodeAsync().Result;

Note: In some cases, this might lead to a deadlock: Your call to Result blocks the main thread, thereby preventing the remainder of the async code to execute. You have the following options to make sure that this doesn't happen:

Add .ConfigureAwait(false) to your library method or

explicitly execute your async method in a thread pool thread and wait for it to finish: string code = Task.Run(() => GenerateCodeAsync).Result;

This does not mean that you should just mindlessly add .ConfigureAwait(false) after all your async calls! For a detailed analysis on why and when you should use .ConfigureAwait(false), see the following blog post:

.NET Blog: ConfigureAwait FAQ


If invoking result risks a deadlock, then when is it safe to get the result? Does every asynchronous call require Task.Run or ConfigureAwait(false)?
There is no "main thread" in ASP.NET (unlike a GUI app), but the deadlock is still possible because of how AspNetSynchronizationContext.Post serializes async continuations: Task newTask = _lastScheduledTask.ContinueWith(_ => SafeWrapCallback(action)); _lastScheduledTask = newTask;
@RobertHarvey: If you have no control over the implementation of the async method you're blocking on, then yes, you should wrap it with Task.Run to stay safe. Or use something like WithNoContext to reduce redundant thread switching.
NOTE: Calling .Result can still deadlock if the caller is on the thread pool itself. Take a scenario where the Thread Pool is of size 32 and 32 tasks are running and Wait()/Result waiting on a yet-to-be-scheduled 33rd task that wants to run on one of the waiting threads.
@Warty - to clarify, for the deadlock to happen, the thread pool would have to re-use the same thread that is waiting for the result. This will happen rarely - which is bad, because when it does happen, it won't be obvious what went wrong.
D
Diego Torres

You should get the awaiter (GetAwaiter()) and end the wait for the completion of the asynchronous task (GetResult()).

string code = GenerateCodeAsync().GetAwaiter().GetResult();

We've run into deadlocks using this solution. Be warned.
MSDN Task.GetAwaiter: This method is intended for compiler use rather than for use in application code.
I still got the error Dialog popup (against my will), with the buttons 'Switch To' or 'Retry'…. however, the call actually executes and does return with a proper response.
@Oliver, I just came across this article looking for why my application in WebForms was deadlocked when I had the code above. This does indeed cause a deadlock.
R
Romano Zumbé

You should be able to get this done using delegates, lambda expression

private void button2_Click(object sender, EventArgs e)
    {

        label1.Text = "waiting....";

        Task<string> sCode = Task.Run(async () =>
        {
            string msg =await GenerateCodeAsync();
            return msg;
        });

        label1.Text += sCode.Result;

    }

    private Task<string> GenerateCodeAsync()
    {
        return Task.Run<string>(() => GenerateCode());
    }

    private string GenerateCode()
    {
        Thread.Sleep(2000);
        return "I m back" ;
    }

This snippet will not compile. The return type from Task.Run is Task. See this MSDN blog for full explanation.
Thanks for pointing out, yes it returns Task type. Replacing "string sCode" to Task or var sCode should resolve it. Adding a full compile code for ease.
IMHO, the essence of what makes this more likely to succeed, is using Task.Run to wrap the call - thus moving it to the thread pool. However, based on other answer and comments, this does not ensure it will never deadlock - it might simply make the deadlock "rare" - thus even harder to track down what is going wrong.
C
Community

I need to call this method from a synchronously method.

It's possible with GenerateCodeAsync().Result or GenerateCodeAsync().Wait(), as the other answer suggests. This would block the current thread until GenerateCodeAsync has completed.

However, your question is tagged with , and you also left the comment:

I was hoping for a simpler solution, thinking that asp.net handled this much easier than writing so many lines of code

My point is, you should not be blocking on an asynchronous method in ASP.NET. This will reduce the scalability of your web app, and may create a deadlock (when an await continuation inside GenerateCodeAsync is posted to AspNetSynchronizationContext). Using Task.Run(...).Result to offload something to a pool thread and then block will hurt the scalability even more, as it incurs +1 more thread to process a given HTTP request.

ASP.NET has built-in support for asynchronous methods, either through asynchronous controllers (in ASP.NET MVC and Web API) or directly via AsyncManager and PageAsyncTask in classic ASP.NET. You should use it. For more details, check this answer.


I am overwriting SaveChanges() method of DbContext, and here i am calling the async methods, so unfortunately async controller won't help me in this situation
@RaraituL, in general, you don't mix async and sync code, pick euther model. You can implement both SaveChangesAsync and SaveChanges, just make sure they don't get called both in the same ASP.NET project.
Not all .NET MVC filters support asynchronous code, for example IAuthorizationFilter, so i cannot use async all the way
@Noseratio that is an unrealistic goal. There are too many libraries with asynchronous and synchronous code as well as situations in which using only one model is not possible. MVC ActionFilters don't support asynchronous code, for example.
@Noserato, the question is about calling asynchronous method from synchronous. Sometime you can't change API you implementing. Let's say you implementing some synchronous interface from some 3-rd party framework "A" (you can't rewrite framework to asynchronous manner) but 3rd-party library "B" you are trying to use in your implementation has only asynchronous. Also resulting product is also library and can be used anywhere including ASP.NET etc.
V
Vitaliy Markitanov

Microsoft Identity has extension methods which call async methods synchronously. For example there is GenerateUserIdentityAsync() method and equal CreateIdentity()

If you look at UserManagerExtensions.CreateIdentity() it look like this:

 public static ClaimsIdentity CreateIdentity<TUser, TKey>(this UserManager<TUser, TKey> manager, TUser user,
        string authenticationType)
        where TKey : IEquatable<TKey>
        where TUser : class, IUser<TKey>
    {
        if (manager == null)
        {
            throw new ArgumentNullException("manager");
        }
        return AsyncHelper.RunSync(() => manager.CreateIdentityAsync(user, authenticationType));
    }

Now lets see what AsyncHelper.RunSync does

  public static TResult RunSync<TResult>(Func<Task<TResult>> func)
    {
        var cultureUi = CultureInfo.CurrentUICulture;
        var culture = CultureInfo.CurrentCulture;
        return _myTaskFactory.StartNew(() =>
        {
            Thread.CurrentThread.CurrentCulture = culture;
            Thread.CurrentThread.CurrentUICulture = cultureUi;
            return func();
        }).Unwrap().GetAwaiter().GetResult();
    }

So, this is your wrapper for async method. And please don't read data from Result - it will potentially block your code in ASP.

There is another way - which is suspicious for me, but you can consider it too

  Result r = null;

            YourAsyncMethod()
                .ContinueWith(t =>
                {
                    r = t.Result;
                })
                .Wait();

What do you consider to be the issue with the second way you have suggested?
@DavidClarke probably the thread safety issue of accessing a non-volatile variable from multiple threads without a lock.
O
Ogglas

To prevent deadlocks I always try to use Task.Run() when I have to call an async method synchronously that @Heinzi mentions.

However the method has to be modified if the async method uses parameters. For example Task.Run(GenerateCodeAsync("test")).Result gives the error:

Argument 1: cannot convert from 'System.Threading.Tasks.Task' to 'System.Action'

This could be called like this instead:

string code = Task.Run(() => GenerateCodeAsync("test")).Result;

s
soccer7

Most of the answers on this thread are either complex or will result in deadlock.

Following method is simple and it will avoid deadlock because we are waiting for the task to finish and only then getting its result-

var task = Task.Run(() => GenerateCodeAsync()); 
task.Wait();
string code = task.Result;

Furthermore, here is a reference to MSDN article that talks about exactly same thing- https://blogs.msdn.microsoft.com/jpsanders/2017/08/28/asp-net-do-not-use-task-result-in-main-context/


Despite that Microsoft reference, its Task.Run that makes this work (when running on ASP.NET context thread). Wait is irrelevant - Result does the equivalent when task has not completed. See this SO Q&A.
@ToolmakerSteve I don't agree with you. I looked at this reference and the code between the two is not the same. Pulling the .Result directly from the task can randomly result in deadlocks. I know, I've had the issue. Very hard to troubleshoot when it happens.
I would have to say that this is the most correct solution when you cannot make the calling method async. The best answer is to make the whole flow async.
@FrankThomas - Looking at the source reference mentioned in stackoverflow.com/a/35948021/199364, Task.Wait tests IsWaitNotificationEnabledOrNotRanToCompletion, then calls InternalWait. Future.Result tests IsWaitNotificationEnabledOrNotRanToCompletion, then calls GetResultCore, which does if (!IsCompleted) InternalWait. I don't see any difference, w.r.t. deadlock potential. Of course its impossible to prove absence of deadlocks, and any change in code changes timing, so its entirely possible to have one approach fail randomly, and the other work .. until it doesn't.
(I mean its impossible to prove absence, unless the absence is provable by design or by static analysis; my point is that you can't determine that Wait doesn't cause though Result does, given the implementation shown.)
J
Jiří Herník

Well I am using this approach, which will also handle and propagate exceptions from the underlying async task.

    private string RunSync()
    {
        var task = Task.Run(async () => await GenerateCodeService.GenerateCodeAsync());
        if (task.IsFaulted && task.Exception != null)
        {
            throw task.Exception;
        }

        return task.Result;
    }

P
Paul

How about some extension methods that asynchronously await the completion of the asynchronous operation, then set a ManualResetEvent to indicate completion.

NOTE: You can use Task.Run(), however extension methods are a cleaner interface for expressing what you really want.

Tests showing how to use the extensions:

    [TestClass]
    public class TaskExtensionsTests
    {
        [TestMethod]
        public void AsynchronousOperationWithNoResult()
        {
            SampleAsynchronousOperationWithNoResult().AwaitResult();
        }

        [TestMethod]
        public void AsynchronousOperationWithResult()
        {
            Assert.AreEqual(3, SampleAsynchronousOperationWithResult(3).AwaitResult());
        }

        [TestMethod]
        [ExpectedException(typeof(Exception))]
        public void AsynchronousOperationWithNoResultThrows()
        {
            SampleAsynchronousOperationWithNoResultThrows().AwaitResult();
        }

        [TestMethod]
        [ExpectedException(typeof(Exception))]
        public void AsynchronousOperationWithResultThrows()
        {
            SampleAsynchronousOperationWithResultThrows(3).AwaitResult();
        }

        private static async Task SampleAsynchronousOperationWithNoResult()
        {
            await Task.Yield();
        }

        private static async Task<T> SampleAsynchronousOperationWithResult<T>(T result)
        {
            await Task.Yield();
            return result;
        }

        private static async Task SampleAsynchronousOperationWithNoResultThrows()
        {
            await Task.Yield();
            throw new Exception();
        }

        private static async Task<T> SampleAsynchronousOperationWithResultThrows<T>(T result)
        {
            await Task.Yield();
            throw new Exception();
        }

        [TestMethod]
        public void AsynchronousValueOperationWithNoResult()
        {
            SampleAsynchronousValueOperationWithNoResult().AwaitResult();
        }

        [TestMethod]
        public void AsynchronousValueOperationWithResult()
        {
            Assert.AreEqual(3, SampleAsynchronousValueOperationWithResult(3).AwaitResult());
        }

        [TestMethod]
        [ExpectedException(typeof(Exception))]
        public void AsynchronousValueOperationWithNoResultThrows()
        {
            SampleAsynchronousValueOperationWithNoResultThrows().AwaitResult();
        }

        [TestMethod]
        [ExpectedException(typeof(Exception))]
        public void AsynchronousValueOperationWithResultThrows()
        {
            SampleAsynchronousValueOperationWithResultThrows(3).AwaitResult();
        }

        private static async ValueTask SampleAsynchronousValueOperationWithNoResult()
        {
            await Task.Yield();
        }

        private static async ValueTask<T> SampleAsynchronousValueOperationWithResult<T>(T result)
        {
            await Task.Yield();
            return result;
        }

        private static async ValueTask SampleAsynchronousValueOperationWithNoResultThrows()
        {
            await Task.Yield();
            throw new Exception();
        }

        private static async ValueTask<T> SampleAsynchronousValueOperationWithResultThrows<T>(T result)
        {
            await Task.Yield();
            throw new Exception();
        }
    }

The extensions

    /// <summary>
    /// Defines extension methods for <see cref="Task"/> and <see cref="ValueTask"/>.
    /// </summary>
    public static class TaskExtensions
    {
        /// <summary>
        /// Synchronously await the results of an asynchronous operation without deadlocking; ignoring cancellation.
        /// </summary>
        /// <param name="task">
        /// The <see cref="Task"/> representing the pending operation.
        /// </param>
        public static void AwaitCompletion(this ValueTask task)
        {
            new SynchronousAwaiter(task, true).GetResult();
        }

        /// <summary>
        /// Synchronously await the results of an asynchronous operation without deadlocking; ignoring cancellation.
        /// </summary>
        /// <param name="task">
        /// The <see cref="Task"/> representing the pending operation.
        /// </param>
        public static void AwaitCompletion(this Task task)
        {
            new SynchronousAwaiter(task, true).GetResult();
        }

        /// <summary>
        /// Synchronously await the results of an asynchronous operation without deadlocking.
        /// </summary>
        /// <param name="task">
        /// The <see cref="Task"/> representing the pending operation.
        /// </param>
        /// <typeparam name="T">
        /// The result type of the operation.
        /// </typeparam>
        /// <returns>
        /// The result of the operation.
        /// </returns>
        public static T AwaitResult<T>(this Task<T> task)
        {
            return new SynchronousAwaiter<T>(task).GetResult();
        }

        /// <summary>
        /// Synchronously await the results of an asynchronous operation without deadlocking.
        /// </summary>
        /// <param name="task">
        /// The <see cref="Task"/> representing the pending operation.
        /// </param>
        public static void AwaitResult(this Task task)
        {
            new SynchronousAwaiter(task).GetResult();
        }

        /// <summary>
        /// Synchronously await the results of an asynchronous operation without deadlocking.
        /// </summary>
        /// <param name="task">
        /// The <see cref="ValueTask"/> representing the pending operation.
        /// </param>
        /// <typeparam name="T">
        /// The result type of the operation.
        /// </typeparam>
        /// <returns>
        /// The result of the operation.
        /// </returns>
        public static T AwaitResult<T>(this ValueTask<T> task)
        {
            return new SynchronousAwaiter<T>(task).GetResult();
        }

        /// <summary>
        /// Synchronously await the results of an asynchronous operation without deadlocking.
        /// </summary>
        /// <param name="task">
        /// The <see cref="ValueTask"/> representing the pending operation.
        /// </param>
        public static void AwaitResult(this ValueTask task)
        {
            new SynchronousAwaiter(task).GetResult();
        }

        /// <summary>
        /// Ignore the <see cref="OperationCanceledException"/> if the operation is cancelled.
        /// </summary>
        /// <param name="task">
        /// The <see cref="Task"/> representing the asynchronous operation whose cancellation is to be ignored.
        /// </param>
        /// <returns>
        /// The <see cref="Task"/> representing the asynchronous operation whose cancellation is ignored.
        /// </returns>
        public static async Task IgnoreCancellationResult(this Task task)
        {
            try
            {
                await task.ConfigureAwait(false);
            }
            catch (OperationCanceledException)
            {
            }
        }

        /// <summary>
        /// Ignore the <see cref="OperationCanceledException"/> if the operation is cancelled.
        /// </summary>
        /// <param name="task">
        /// The <see cref="ValueTask"/> representing the asynchronous operation whose cancellation is to be ignored.
        /// </param>
        /// <returns>
        /// The <see cref="ValueTask"/> representing the asynchronous operation whose cancellation is ignored.
        /// </returns>
        public static async ValueTask IgnoreCancellationResult(this ValueTask task)
        {
            try
            {
                await task.ConfigureAwait(false);
            }
            catch (OperationCanceledException)
            {
            }
        }

        /// <summary>
        /// Ignore the results of an asynchronous operation allowing it to run and die silently in the background.
        /// </summary>
        /// <param name="task">
        /// The <see cref="Task"/> representing the asynchronous operation whose results are to be ignored.
        /// </param>
        public static async void IgnoreResult(this Task task)
        {
            try
            {
                await task.ConfigureAwait(false);
            }
            catch
            {
                // ignore exceptions
            }
        }

        /// <summary>
        /// Ignore the results of an asynchronous operation allowing it to run and die silently in the background.
        /// </summary>
        /// <param name="task">
        /// The <see cref="ValueTask"/> representing the asynchronous operation whose results are to be ignored.
        /// </param>
        public static async void IgnoreResult(this ValueTask task)
        {
            try
            {
                await task.ConfigureAwait(false);
            }
            catch
            {
                // ignore exceptions
            }
        }
    }

    /// <summary>
    /// Internal class for waiting for asynchronous operations that have a result.
    /// </summary>
    /// <typeparam name="TResult">
    /// The result type.
    /// </typeparam>
    public class SynchronousAwaiter<TResult>
    {
        /// <summary>
        /// The manual reset event signaling completion.
        /// </summary>
        private readonly ManualResetEvent manualResetEvent;

        /// <summary>
        /// The exception thrown by the asynchronous operation.
        /// </summary>
        private Exception exception;

        /// <summary>
        /// The result of the asynchronous operation.
        /// </summary>
        private TResult result;

        /// <summary>
        /// Initializes a new instance of the <see cref="SynchronousAwaiter{TResult}"/> class.
        /// </summary>
        /// <param name="task">
        /// The task representing an asynchronous operation.
        /// </param>
        public SynchronousAwaiter(Task<TResult> task)
        {
            this.manualResetEvent = new ManualResetEvent(false);
            this.WaitFor(task);
        }

        /// <summary>
        /// Initializes a new instance of the <see cref="SynchronousAwaiter{TResult}"/> class.
        /// </summary>
        /// <param name="task">
        /// The task representing an asynchronous operation.
        /// </param>
        public SynchronousAwaiter(ValueTask<TResult> task)
        {
            this.manualResetEvent = new ManualResetEvent(false);
            this.WaitFor(task);
        }

        /// <summary>
        /// Gets a value indicating whether the operation is complete.
        /// </summary>
        public bool IsComplete => this.manualResetEvent.WaitOne(0);

        /// <summary>
        /// Synchronously get the result of an asynchronous operation.
        /// </summary>
        /// <returns>
        /// The result of the asynchronous operation.
        /// </returns>
        public TResult GetResult()
        {
            this.manualResetEvent.WaitOne();
            return this.exception != null ? throw this.exception : this.result;
        }

        /// <summary>
        /// Tries to synchronously get the result of an asynchronous operation.
        /// </summary>
        /// <param name="operationResult">
        /// The result of the operation.
        /// </param>
        /// <returns>
        /// The result of the asynchronous operation.
        /// </returns>
        public bool TryGetResult(out TResult operationResult)
        {
            if (this.IsComplete)
            {
                operationResult = this.exception != null ? throw this.exception : this.result;
                return true;
            }

            operationResult = default;
            return false;
        }

        /// <summary>
        /// Background "thread" which waits for the specified asynchronous operation to complete.
        /// </summary>
        /// <param name="task">
        /// The task.
        /// </param>
        private async void WaitFor(Task<TResult> task)
        {
            try
            {
                this.result = await task.ConfigureAwait(false);
            }
            catch (Exception exception)
            {
                this.exception = exception;
            }
            finally
            {
                this.manualResetEvent.Set();
            }
        }

        /// <summary>
        /// Background "thread" which waits for the specified asynchronous operation to complete.
        /// </summary>
        /// <param name="task">
        /// The task.
        /// </param>
        private async void WaitFor(ValueTask<TResult> task)
        {
            try
            {
                this.result = await task.ConfigureAwait(false);
            }
            catch (Exception exception)
            {
                this.exception = exception;
            }
            finally
            {
                this.manualResetEvent.Set();
            }
        }
    }

    /// <summary>
    /// Internal class for  waiting for  asynchronous operations that have no result.
    /// </summary>
    public class SynchronousAwaiter
    {
        /// <summary>
        /// The manual reset event signaling completion.
        /// </summary>
        private readonly ManualResetEvent manualResetEvent = new ManualResetEvent(false);

        /// <summary>
        /// The exception thrown by the asynchronous operation.
        /// </summary>
        private Exception exception;

        /// <summary>
        /// Initializes a new instance of the <see cref="SynchronousAwaiter{TResult}"/> class.
        /// </summary>
        /// <param name="task">
        /// The task representing an asynchronous operation.
        /// </param>
        /// <param name="ignoreCancellation">
        /// Indicates whether to ignore cancellation. Default is false.
        /// </param>
        public SynchronousAwaiter(Task task, bool ignoreCancellation = false)
        {
            this.manualResetEvent = new ManualResetEvent(false);
            this.WaitFor(task, ignoreCancellation);
        }

        /// <summary>
        /// Initializes a new instance of the <see cref="SynchronousAwaiter{TResult}"/> class.
        /// </summary>
        /// <param name="task">
        /// The task representing an asynchronous operation.
        /// </param>
        /// <param name="ignoreCancellation">
        /// Indicates whether to ignore cancellation. Default is false.
        /// </param>
        public SynchronousAwaiter(ValueTask task, bool ignoreCancellation = false)
        {
            this.manualResetEvent = new ManualResetEvent(false);
            this.WaitFor(task, ignoreCancellation);
        }

        /// <summary>
        /// Gets a value indicating whether the operation is complete.
        /// </summary>
        public bool IsComplete => this.manualResetEvent.WaitOne(0);

        /// <summary>
        /// Synchronously get the result of an asynchronous operation.
        /// </summary>
        public void GetResult()
        {
            this.manualResetEvent.WaitOne();
            if (this.exception != null)
            {
                throw this.exception;
            }
        }

        /// <summary>
        /// Background "thread" which waits for the specified asynchronous operation to complete.
        /// </summary>
        /// <param name="task">
        /// The task.
        /// </param>
        /// <param name="ignoreCancellation">
        /// Indicates whether to ignore cancellation. Default is false.
        /// </param>
        private async void WaitFor(Task task, bool ignoreCancellation)
        {
            try
            {
                await task.ConfigureAwait(false);
            }
            catch (OperationCanceledException)
            {
            }
            catch (Exception exception)
            {
                this.exception = exception;
            }
            finally
            {
                this.manualResetEvent.Set();
            }
        }

        /// <summary>
        /// Background "thread" which waits for the specified asynchronous operation to complete.
        /// </summary>
        /// <param name="task">
        ///     The task.
        /// </param>
        /// <param name="ignoreCancellation">
        /// Indicates whether to ignore cancellation. Default is false.
        /// </param>
        private async void WaitFor(ValueTask task, bool ignoreCancellation)
        {
            try
            {
                await task.ConfigureAwait(false);
            }
            catch (OperationCanceledException)
            {
            }
            catch (Exception exception)
            {
                this.exception = exception;
            }
            finally
            {
                this.manualResetEvent.Set();
            }
        }
    }
}

A
Avi Tshuva

EDIT:

Task has Wait method, Task.Wait(), which waits for the "promise" to resolve and then continues, thus rendering it synchronous. example:


async Task<String> MyAsyncMethod() { ... }

String mySyncMethod() {

    return MyAsyncMethod().Wait();
}

Kindly elaborate on your Answer. How is it used? How specifically does it help to answer the Question?
Z
Zibri

I prefer a non blocking approach:

            Dim aw1=GenerateCodeAsync().GetAwaiter()
            While Not aw1.IsCompleted
                Application.DoEvents()
            End While

d
dush88c

If you have an async method called " RefreshList " then, you can call that async method from a non-async method like below.

Task.Run(async () => { await RefreshList(); });