ChatGPT解决这个技术问题 Extra ChatGPT

SQL SELECT WHERE 字段包含单词

我需要一个可以返回如下结果的选择:

SELECT * FROM MyTable WHERE Column1 CONTAINS 'word1 word2 word3'

我需要所有结果,即这包括带有'word2 word3 word1'或'word1 word3 word2'或三者的任何其他组合的字符串。

所有单词都必须在结果中。


m
mvp

相当慢,但包含任何单词的工作方法:

SELECT * FROM mytable
WHERE column1 LIKE '%word1%'
   OR column1 LIKE '%word2%'
   OR column1 LIKE '%word3%'

如果您需要所有单词都存在,请使用以下命令:

SELECT * FROM mytable
WHERE column1 LIKE '%word1%'
  AND column1 LIKE '%word2%'
  AND column1 LIKE '%word3%'

如果您想要更快的速度,您需要查看全文搜索,这对于每种数据库类型都非常具体。


+ 1 我同意它的速度较慢,但可以通过良好的索引来缓解
当您搜索以通配符开头的 LIKE 时,@PreetSangha 索引?请告诉我怎么做!
在 PostgreSQL 9.1 及更高版本中,您可以创建 can index such searches 的三元索引。
@AquaAlex:如果文本有 word3 word2 word1,您的语句将失败。
这种方法的另一个缺点:'%word%' 也会找到 'words'、'crosswordpuzzle' 和 'sword'(仅作为示例)。我必须做一个 column1 LIKE 'word' OR column1 LIKE 'word %' OR column1 LIKE '% word' OR column1 LIKE ' word ' 才能找到完全匹配的单词 - 对于单词不匹配的条目,它仍然会失败只是用空格隔开。
S
Sam

请注意,如果您使用 LIKE 来确定一个字符串是否是另一个字符串的子字符串,则必须对搜索字符串中的模式匹配字符进行转义。

如果您的 SQL 方言支持 CHARINDEX,则使用它会容易得多:

SELECT * FROM MyTable
WHERE CHARINDEX('word1', Column1) > 0
  AND CHARINDEX('word2', Column1) > 0
  AND CHARINDEX('word3', Column1) > 0

另外,请记住,这个和接受的答案中的方法仅涵盖子字符串匹配而不是单词匹配。因此,例如,字符串 'word1word2word3' 仍然匹配。


如果您的搜索词是一个变量而不是在搜索之前添加“%”字符,这似乎更容易
在 Microsoft SQL 服务器和引擎中,我们应该使用 InStr() 而不是 CHARINDEX
@23W MS SQL 中没有 InStr
@ShaneBlake 而不是将 % 添加到变量中,只需将其添加到搜索中 '%'+var+'%' 是的,它有点 ty[ing 并且非常丑陋,但可能比更改变量的值更好。
E
Eduardo Cuomo

功能

 CREATE FUNCTION [dbo].[fnSplit] ( @sep CHAR(1), @str VARCHAR(512) )
 RETURNS TABLE AS
 RETURN (
           WITH Pieces(pn, start, stop) AS (
           SELECT 1, 1, CHARINDEX(@sep, @str)
           UNION ALL
           SELECT pn + 1, stop + 1, CHARINDEX(@sep, @str, stop + 1)
           FROM Pieces
           WHERE stop > 0
      )

      SELECT
           pn AS Id,
           SUBSTRING(@str, start, CASE WHEN stop > 0 THEN stop - start ELSE 512 END) AS Data
      FROM
           Pieces
 )

询问

 DECLARE @FilterTable TABLE (Data VARCHAR(512))

 INSERT INTO @FilterTable (Data)
 SELECT DISTINCT S.Data
 FROM fnSplit(' ', 'word1 word2 word3') S -- Contains words

 SELECT DISTINCT
      T.*
 FROM
      MyTable T
      INNER JOIN @FilterTable F1 ON T.Column1 LIKE '%' + F1.Data + '%'
      LEFT JOIN @FilterTable F2 ON T.Column1 NOT LIKE '%' + F2.Data + '%'
 WHERE
      F2.Data IS NULL

优秀!先生,如何开始学习这个功能?什么是碎片?你能告诉我关于这一行的伪代码吗? SUBSTRING(@str, start, CASE WHEN > 0 THEN stop - start ELSE 512 END) AS 数据
这一举动令人难以置信,我真的很嫉妒:( ___________________________________________________________________________________ INNER JOIN (@FilterTable F1 ON T.Column1 LIKE '%' + F1.Data + '%' LEFT JOIN (@FilterTable F2 ON T.Column1 NOT LIKE '%' + F2.数据 + '%'
m
messed-up

代替 SELECT * FROM MyTable WHERE Column1 CONTAINS 'word1 word2 word3',在这些词之间添加 And,例如:

SELECT * FROM MyTable WHERE Column1 CONTAINS 'word1 And word2 And word3'

有关详细信息,请参阅此处https://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms187787.aspx

更新

要选择短语,请使用双引号,例如:

SELECT * FROM MyTable WHERE Column1 CONTAINS '"Phrase one" And word2 And "Phrase Two"'

ps您必须先在表格上启用全文搜索,然后才能使用包含关键字。有关详细信息,请参阅此处https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/sql/relational-databases/search/get-started-with-full-text-search


J
Jon Crowell
SELECT * FROM MyTable WHERE 
Column1 LIKE '%word1%'
AND Column1 LIKE '%word2%'
AND Column1 LIKE  '%word3%'

根据对问题的编辑将 OR 更改为 AND


我需要以任意组合将所有单词包含在结果中
m
mirmdasif

如果您使用的是 Oracle 数据库,那么您可以使用 contains 查询来实现这一点。包含查询比类似查询更快。

如果你需要所有的话

SELECT * FROM MyTable WHERE CONTAINS(Column1,'word1 and word2 and word3', 1) > 0

如果您需要任何单词

SELECT * FROM MyTable WHERE CONTAINS(Column1,'word1 or word2 or word3', 1) > 0

包含您的列上的 CONTEXT 类型的需要索引。

CREATE INDEX SEARCH_IDX ON MyTable(Column) INDEXTYPE IS CTXSYS.CONTEXT

@downvoters 感谢您发表评论,说明答案有什么问题。同样的查询每天在我们的企业解决方案中运行超过 1000 次,没有任何问题:)
OP 没有指定使用哪个数据库,每个人都认为是 Sql Server。但是,由于您在回复中指定了 Oracle,所以我不理解反对者。
F
FRNathan13

如果你只是想找到一个匹配。

SELECT * FROM MyTable WHERE INSTR('word1 word2 word3',Column1)<>0

SQL 服务器:

CHARINDEX(Column1, 'word1 word2 word3', 1)<>0

获得完全匹配。示例 (';a;ab;ac;',';b;') 将无法匹配。

SELECT * FROM MyTable WHERE INSTR(';word1;word2;word3;',';'||Column1||';')<>0

“INSTR”不是可识别的内置函数名称。在我的 SQL Server 中。
A
Anastasios Selmani

实现问题中提到的最简单的方法之一是将 CONTAINS 与 NEAR 或“~”一起使用。例如,以下查询将为我们提供特别包含 word1、word2 和 word3 的所有列。

SELECT * FROM MyTable WHERE CONTAINS(Column1, 'word1 NEAR word2 NEAR word3')

SELECT * FROM MyTable WHERE CONTAINS(Column1, 'word1 ~ word2 ~ word3')

此外,CONTAINSTABLE 根据“word1”、“word2”和“word3”的接近度返回每个文档的排名。例如,如果一个文档包含句子“The word1 is word2 and word3”,那么它的排名会很高,因为这些词比其他文档中的词更接近。

我想补充的另一件事是,我们还可以使用proximity_term 来查找单词在列短语内的特定距离内的列。


很好的答案,但请注意,如果表或视图没有全文索引,这将不起作用。 Contains() 将引发错误:Cannot use a CONTAINS or FREETEXT predicate on table or indexed view 'TABLENAME' because it is not full-text indexed.
M
Milad Ahmadi

最好的方法是在表中的列上创建全文索引并使用包含而不是 LIKE

SELECT * FROM MyTable WHERE 
contains(Column1 , N'word1' )
AND contains(Column1 , N'word2' )
AND contains(Column1 , N'word3' )

A
Arun Vinoth - MVP

为什么不改用“in”呢?

Select *
from table
where columnname in (word1, word2, word3)

因为它不起作用。你真的试过了吗?
我相信这只会返回完全匹配。
我也误解了最初的问题:他们不想找到一个完全匹配的词,而是一个词是(可能)更大的字符串的一部分。对于更简单的“精确匹配”情况,只要单词在单引号之间(参见 SQLfiddle),它就可以工作
J
JBelfort

理想情况下,如果使用的话,这应该在 sql server 全文搜索的帮助下完成。但是,如果由于某种原因您无法在您的数据库上工作,这里有一个性能密集型解决方案:-

-- table to search in
CREATE TABLE dbo.myTable
    (
    myTableId int NOT NULL IDENTITY (1, 1),
    code varchar(200) NOT NULL, 
    description varchar(200) NOT NULL -- this column contains the values we are going to search in 
    )  ON [PRIMARY]
GO

-- function to split space separated search string into individual words
CREATE FUNCTION [dbo].[fnSplit] (@StringInput nvarchar(max),
@Delimiter nvarchar(1))
RETURNS @OutputTable TABLE (
  id nvarchar(1000)
)
AS
BEGIN
  DECLARE @String nvarchar(100);

  WHILE LEN(@StringInput) > 0
  BEGIN
    SET @String = LEFT(@StringInput, ISNULL(NULLIF(CHARINDEX(@Delimiter, @StringInput) - 1, -1),
    LEN(@StringInput)));
    SET @StringInput = SUBSTRING(@StringInput, ISNULL(NULLIF(CHARINDEX
    (
    @Delimiter, @StringInput
    ),
    0
    ), LEN
    (
    @StringInput)
    )
    + 1, LEN(@StringInput));

    INSERT INTO @OutputTable (id)
      VALUES (@String);
  END;

  RETURN;
END;
GO

-- this is the search script which can be optionally converted to a stored procedure /function


declare @search varchar(max) = 'infection upper acute genito'; -- enter your search string here
-- the searched string above should give rows containing the following
-- infection in upper side with acute genitointestinal tract
-- acute infection in upper teeth
-- acute genitointestinal pain

if (len(trim(@search)) = 0) -- if search string is empty, just return records ordered alphabetically
begin
 select 1 as Priority ,myTableid, code, Description from myTable order by Description 
 return;
end

declare @splitTable Table(
wordRank int Identity(1,1), -- individual words are assinged priority order (in order of occurence/position)
word varchar(200)
)
declare @nonWordTable Table( -- table to trim out auxiliary verbs, prepositions etc. from the search
id varchar(200)
)

insert into @nonWordTable values
('of'),
('with'),
('at'),
('in'),
('for'),
('on'),
('by'),
('like'),
('up'),
('off'),
('near'),
('is'),
('are'),
(','),
(':'),
(';')

insert into @splitTable
select id from dbo.fnSplit(@search,' '); -- this function gives you a table with rows containing all the space separated words of the search like in this e.g., the output will be -
--  id
-------------
-- infection
-- upper
-- acute
-- genito

delete s from @splitTable s join @nonWordTable n  on s.word = n.id; -- trimming out non-words here
declare @countOfSearchStrings int = (select count(word) from @splitTable);  -- count of space separated words for search
declare @highestPriority int = POWER(@countOfSearchStrings,3);

with plainMatches as
(
select myTableid, @highestPriority as Priority from myTable where Description like @search  -- exact matches have highest priority
union                                      
select myTableid, @highestPriority-1 as Priority from myTable where Description like  @search + '%'  -- then with something at the end
union                                      
select myTableid, @highestPriority-2 as Priority from myTable where Description like '%' + @search -- then with something at the beginning
union                                      
select myTableid, @highestPriority-3 as Priority from myTable where Description like '%' + @search + '%' -- then if the word falls somewhere in between
),
splitWordMatches as( -- give each searched word a rank based on its position in the searched string
                     -- and calculate its char index in the field to search
select myTable.myTableid, (@countOfSearchStrings - s.wordRank) as Priority, s.word,
wordIndex = CHARINDEX(s.word, myTable.Description)  from myTable join @splitTable s on myTable.Description like '%'+ s.word + '%'
-- and not exists(select myTableid from plainMatches p where p.myTableId = myTable.myTableId) -- need not look into myTables that have already been found in plainmatches as they are highest ranked
                                                                              -- this one takes a long time though, so commenting it, will have no impact on the result
),
matchingRowsWithAllWords as (
 select myTableid, count(myTableid) as myTableCount from splitWordMatches group by(myTableid) having count(myTableid) = @countOfSearchStrings
)
, -- trim off the CTE here if you don't care about the ordering of words to be considered for priority
wordIndexRatings as( -- reverse the char indexes retrived above so that words occuring earlier have higher weightage
                     -- and then normalize them to sequential values
select s.myTableid, Priority, word, ROW_NUMBER() over (partition by s.myTableid order by wordindex desc) as comparativeWordIndex 
from splitWordMatches s join matchingRowsWithAllWords m on s.myTableId = m.myTableId
)
,
wordIndexSequenceRatings as ( -- need to do this to ensure that if the same set of words from search string is found in two rows,
                              -- their sequence in the field value is taken into account for higher priority
    select w.myTableid, w.word, (w.Priority + w.comparativeWordIndex + coalesce(sequncedPriority ,0)) as Priority
    from wordIndexRatings w left join 
    (
     select w1.myTableid, w1.priority, w1.word, w1.comparativeWordIndex, count(w1.myTableid) as sequncedPriority
     from wordIndexRatings w1 join wordIndexRatings w2 on w1.myTableId = w2.myTableId and w1.Priority > w2.Priority and w1.comparativeWordIndex>w2.comparativeWordIndex
     group by w1.myTableid, w1.priority,w1.word, w1.comparativeWordIndex
    ) 
    sequencedPriority on w.myTableId = sequencedPriority.myTableId and w.Priority = sequencedPriority.Priority
),
prioritizedSplitWordMatches as ( -- this calculates the cumulative priority for a field value
select  w1.myTableId, sum(w1.Priority) as OverallPriority from wordIndexSequenceRatings w1 join wordIndexSequenceRatings w2 on w1.myTableId =  w2.myTableId 
where w1.word <> w2.word group by w1.myTableid 
),
completeSet as (
select myTableid, priority from plainMatches -- get plain matches which should be highest ranked
union
select myTableid, OverallPriority as priority from prioritizedSplitWordMatches -- get ranked split word matches (which are ordered based on word rank in search string and sequence)
),
maximizedCompleteSet as( -- set the priority of a field value = maximum priority for that field value
select myTableid, max(priority) as Priority  from completeSet group by myTableId
)
select priority, myTable.myTableid , code, Description from maximizedCompleteSet m join myTable  on m.myTableId = myTable.myTableId 
order by Priority desc, Description -- order by priority desc to get highest rated items on top
--offset 0 rows fetch next 50 rows only -- optional paging


D
Daryl Arenas

尝试在 MS SQL Server 的全文索引中使用“tesarus 搜索”。如果您有数百万条记录,这比在搜索中使用“%”要好得多。 tesarus 的内存消耗比其他的少。尝试搜索此功能:)


B
Barry Michael Doyle
SELECT * FROM MyTable WHERE Column1 Like "*word*"

这将显示 column1 的部分值包含 word 的所有记录。


H
Hemant Parmar
DECLARE @SearchStr nvarchar(100)
SET @SearchStr = ' '



CREATE TABLE #Results (ColumnName nvarchar(370), ColumnValue nvarchar(3630))

SET NOCOUNT ON

DECLARE @TableName nvarchar(256), @ColumnName nvarchar(128), @SearchStr2 nvarchar(110)
SET  @TableName = ''
SET @SearchStr2 = QUOTENAME('%' + @SearchStr + '%','''')

WHILE @TableName IS NOT NULL

BEGIN
    SET @ColumnName = ''
    SET @TableName = 
    (
        SELECT MIN(QUOTENAME(TABLE_SCHEMA) + '.' + QUOTENAME(TABLE_NAME))
        FROM     INFORMATION_SCHEMA.TABLES
        WHERE         TABLE_TYPE = 'BASE TABLE'
            AND    QUOTENAME(TABLE_SCHEMA) + '.' + QUOTENAME(TABLE_NAME) > @TableName
            AND    OBJECTPROPERTY(
                    OBJECT_ID(
                        QUOTENAME(TABLE_SCHEMA) + '.' + QUOTENAME(TABLE_NAME)
                         ), 'IsMSShipped'
                           ) = 0
    )

    WHILE (@TableName IS NOT NULL) AND (@ColumnName IS NOT NULL)

    BEGIN
        SET @ColumnName =
        (
            SELECT MIN(QUOTENAME(COLUMN_NAME))
            FROM     INFORMATION_SCHEMA.COLUMNS
            WHERE         TABLE_SCHEMA    = PARSENAME(@TableName, 2)
                AND    TABLE_NAME    = PARSENAME(@TableName, 1)
                AND    DATA_TYPE IN ('char', 'varchar', 'nchar', 'nvarchar', 'int', 'decimal')
                AND    QUOTENAME(COLUMN_NAME) > @ColumnName
        )

        IF @ColumnName IS NOT NULL

        BEGIN
            INSERT INTO #Results
            EXEC
            (
                'SELECT ''' + @TableName + '.' + @ColumnName + ''', LEFT(' + @ColumnName + ', 3630) FROM ' + @TableName + ' (NOLOCK) ' +
                ' WHERE ' + @ColumnName + ' LIKE ' + @SearchStr2
            )
        END
    END   
END

SELECT ColumnName, ColumnValue FROM #Results

DROP TABLE #Results

感谢您提供此代码片段,它可能会提供一些有限的即时帮助。 proper explanation would greatly improve its long-term value 通过显示为什么这是解决问题的好方法,并且会使其对有其他类似问题的未来读者更有用。请edit您的回答以添加一些解释,包括您所做的假设。
v
vidyadhar
select * from table where name regexp '^word[1-3]$'

或者

select * from table where name in ('word1','word2','word3')

“正则表达式”是标准 SQL 吗?
对于第二个查询,不应该引用这个词吗?
此代码似乎检查列是否等于三个单词之一。问题是检查列是否包含所有三个单词。
嗨,这可能很好地解决了这个问题......但如果你能编辑你的答案并提供一些关于它如何工作以及为什么工作的解释会很好:)不要忘记 - 堆栈溢出有很多新手,他们可以从你的专业知识中学到一两件事——对你来说显而易见的事情对他们来说可能并不那么明显。