ChatGPT解决这个技术问题 Extra ChatGPT

What are the differences between the urllib, urllib2, urllib3 and requests module?

In Python, what are the differences between the urllib, urllib2, urllib3 and requests modules? Why are there three? They seem to do the same thing...

This question should be updated to clarify that urllib in Python 3 is yet another option, cleaned up in various ways. But thankfully the official documentation also notes that "The Requests package is recommended for a higher-level HTTP client interface." at 21.6. urllib.request — Extensible library for opening URLs — Python 3.6.3 documentation
Saddly I didn't see any answers telling me what urllib3 is and how urllib3 is different from the official urllib module.
probably worth mentioning httpx — the newer requests-backwords-compatible async library.

N
Nathaniel Jones

I know it's been said already, but I'd highly recommend the requests Python package.

If you've used languages other than python, you're probably thinking urllib and urllib2 are easy to use, not much code, and highly capable, that's how I used to think. But the requests package is so unbelievably useful and short that everyone should be using it.

First, it supports a fully restful API, and is as easy as:

import requests

resp = requests.get('http://www.mywebsite.com/user')
resp = requests.post('http://www.mywebsite.com/user')
resp = requests.put('http://www.mywebsite.com/user/put')
resp = requests.delete('http://www.mywebsite.com/user/delete')

Regardless of whether GET / POST, you never have to encode parameters again, it simply takes a dictionary as an argument and is good to go:

userdata = {"firstname": "John", "lastname": "Doe", "password": "jdoe123"}
resp = requests.post('http://www.mywebsite.com/user', data=userdata)

Plus it even has a built in JSON decoder (again, I know json.loads() isn't a lot more to write, but this sure is convenient):

resp.json()

Or if your response data is just text, use:

resp.text

This is just the tip of the iceberg. This is the list of features from the requests site:

International Domains and URLs

Keep-Alive & Connection Pooling

Sessions with Cookie Persistence

Browser-style SSL Verification

Basic/Digest Authentication

Elegant Key/Value Cookies

Automatic Decompression

Unicode Response Bodies

Multipart File Uploads

Connection Timeouts

.netrc support

List item

Python 2.7, 3.6—3.9

Thread-safe.


It would help to note that the Python 3 documentation has yet another distinct library urllib and that its documentation also officially notes that "The Requests package is recommended for a higher-level HTTP client interface." at 21.6. urllib.request — Extensible library for opening URLs — Python 3.6.3 documentation, and that urllib3 is a great library used by requests.
Ok except I have the impression request has no replacement for urllib.parse()
@Andriy: What did you mean PS?
I don't understand why this is the accepted answer. It didn't answer OP's question.
C
Crast

urllib2 provides some extra functionality, namely the urlopen() function can allow you to specify headers (normally you'd have had to use httplib in the past, which is far more verbose.) More importantly though, urllib2 provides the Request class, which allows for a more declarative approach to doing a request:

r = Request(url='http://www.mysite.com')
r.add_header('User-Agent', 'awesome fetcher')
r.add_data(urllib.urlencode({'foo': 'bar'})
response = urlopen(r)

Note that urlencode() is only in urllib, not urllib2.

There are also handlers for implementing more advanced URL support in urllib2. The short answer is, unless you're working with legacy code, you probably want to use the URL opener from urllib2, but you still need to import into urllib for some of the utility functions.

Bonus answer With Google App Engine, you can use any of httplib, urllib or urllib2, but all of them are just wrappers for Google's URL Fetch API. That is, you are still subject to the same limitations such as ports, protocols, and the length of the response allowed. You can use the core of the libraries as you would expect for retrieving HTTP URLs, though.


How does somebody create a url with an encoded query string using urllib2? It's the only reason I'm using urllib and I'd like to make sure I'm doing everything the latest/greatest way.
Like in my above example, you use urlopen() and Request from urllib2, and you use urlencode() from urllib. No real harm in using both libraries, as long as you make sure you use the correct urlopen. The [urllib docs][1] are clear on that using this is acecepted usage. [1]: docs.python.org/library/urllib2.html#urllib2.urlopen
I used this gist for urllib2.urlopen ; contains other variations too.
urllib2 does not support put or delete which is a pain
requests also allow custom headers: docs.python-requests.org/en/master/user/quickstart/…
0
0 _

This is my understanding of what the relations are between the various "urllibs":

In the Python 2 standard library there exist two HTTP libraries side-by-side. Despite the similar name, they are unrelated: they have a different design and a different implementation.

urllib was the original Python HTTP client, added to the standard library in Python 1.2. Earlier documentation for urllib can be found in Python 1.4.

urllib2 was a more capable HTTP client, added in Python 1.6, intended as a replacement for urllib: urllib2 - new and improved but incompatible version of urllib (still experimental). Earlier documentation for urllib2 can be found in Python 2.1.

The Python 3 standard library has a new urllib which is a merged/refactored/rewritten version of the older modules.

urllib3 is a third-party package (i.e., not in CPython's standard library). Despite the name, it is unrelated to the standard library packages, and there is no intention to include it in the standard library in the future.

Finally, requests internally uses urllib3, but it aims for an easier-to-use API.


S
Siyaram Malav

urllib and urllib2 are both Python modules that do URL request related stuff but offer different functionalities.

1) urllib2 can accept a Request object to set the headers for a URL request, urllib accepts only a URL.

2) urllib provides the urlencode method which is used for the generation of GET query strings, urllib2 doesn't have such a function. This is one of the reasons why urllib is often used along with urllib2.

Requests - Requests’ is a simple, easy-to-use HTTP library written in Python.

1) Python Requests encodes the parameters automatically so you just pass them as simple arguments, unlike in the case of urllib, where you need to use the method urllib.encode() to encode the parameters before passing them.

2) It automatically decoded the response into Unicode.

3) Requests also has far more convenient error handling.If your authentication failed, urllib2 would raise a urllib2.URLError, while Requests would return a normal response object, as expected. All you have to see if the request was successful by boolean response.ok


what about urllib3?
@PirateApp requests is built on top of urllib3. I think code using urllib3 directly can be more efficient, because it lets you reuse the session, whereas requests (at least requests 2, the one everyone uses) creates one for every request, but don't quote me on that. Neither are part of the standard library (yet)
Z
Zeitgeist

Just to add to the existing answers, I don't see anyone mentioning that python requests is not a native library. If you are ok with adding dependencies, then requests is fine. However, if you are trying to avoid adding dependencies, urllib is a native python library that is already available to you.


True, if you want to avoid adding any dependencies, urllib is available. But note that even the Python official documentation recommends the requests library: "The Requests package is recommended for a higher-level HTTP client interface."
@hlongmore Of course, most people wouldn't want to deal with low level urllib, and Requests library provides a nice level of abstraction. It's like using a pancake mix in a box versus making it from scratch. Pros and cons.
A
Arash

One considerable difference is about porting Python2 to Python3. urllib2 does not exist for python3 and its methods ported to urllib. So you are using that heavily and want to migrate to Python3 in future, consider using urllib. However 2to3 tool will automatically do most of the work for you.


G
Gattster

I like the urllib.urlencode function, and it doesn't appear to exist in urllib2.

>>> urllib.urlencode({'abc':'d f', 'def': '-!2'})
'abc=d+f&def=-%212'

Just a note, be careful with urlencode as it can't handle objects directly -- you have to encode them before sending them to urlencode (u'blá'.encode('utf-8'), or whatever).
@user18015: I do not think this applies to Python 3, can you clarify?
As I noted above, this question and the various answers should be updated to clarify that urllib in Python 3 is yet another option, cleaned up in various ways. But thankfully, the official documentation also notes that "The Requests package is recommended for a higher-level HTTP client interface." at 21.6. urllib.request — Extensible library for opening URLs — Python 3.6.3 documentation
urllib2 doesn't exist at all in Python 3
It moved to urllib.parse.urlencode in Python 3.
R
Ransaka Ravihara

I think all answers are pretty good. But fewer details about urllib3.urllib3 is a very powerful HTTP client for python. For installing both of the following commands will work,

urllib3

using pip,

pip install urllib3

or you can get the latest code from Github and install them using,

$ git clone git://github.com/urllib3/urllib3.git
$ cd urllib3
$ python setup.py install

Then you are ready to go,

Just import urllib3 using,

import urllib3

In here, Instead of creating a connection directly, You’ll need a PoolManager instance to make requests. This handles connection pooling and thread-safety for you. There is also a ProxyManager object for routing requests through an HTTP/HTTPS proxy Here you can refer to the documentation. example usage :

>>> from urllib3 import PoolManager
>>> manager = PoolManager(10)
>>> r = manager.request('GET', 'http://google.com/')
>>> r.headers['server']
'gws'
>>> r = manager.request('GET', 'http://yahoo.com/')
>>> r.headers['server']
'YTS/1.20.0'
>>> r = manager.request('POST', 'http://google.com/mail')
>>> r = manager.request('HEAD', 'http://google.com/calendar')
>>> len(manager.pools)
2
>>> conn = manager.connection_from_host('google.com')
>>> conn.num_requests
3

As mentioned in urrlib3 documentations,urllib3 brings many critical features that are missing from the Python standard libraries.

Thread safety.

Connection pooling.

Client-side SSL/TLS verification.

File uploads with multipart encoding.

Helpers for retrying requests and dealing with HTTP redirects.

Support for gzip and deflate encoding.

Proxy support for HTTP and SOCKS.

100% test coverage.

Follow the user guide for more details.

Response content (The HTTPResponse object provides status, data, and header attributes)

Using io Wrappers with Response content

Creating a query parameter

Advanced usage of urllib3

requests

requests uses urllib3 under the hood and make it even simpler to make requests and retrieve data. For one thing, keep-alive is 100% automatic, compared to urllib3 where it's not. It also has event hooks which call a callback function when an event is triggered, like receiving a response In requests, each request type has its own function. So instead of creating a connection or a pool, you directly GET a URL.

For install requests using pip just run

pip install requests

or you can just install from source code,

$ git clone git://github.com/psf/requests.git
$ cd requests
$ python setup.py install

Then, import requests

Here you can refer the official documentation, For some advanced usage like session object, SSL verification, and Event Hooks please refer to this url.


Thank you for this answer. I came here because I had seen urllib3 and didn't know if I should use it or requests. Now I feel informed about how to make that decision going forward. The accepted answer gives a nice breakdown of requests but does not differentiate it from the alternatives.
Yes, I too came here looking for the differences between Requests, urllib, urllib2, and urllib3 and felt dissatisfied with the accepted answer. This clarification should be added or at least linked to the accepted answer. Thank you.
If you are afflicted by a corporate proxy, know that the requests module cheerfully honors environment variables http_proxy, https_proxy, no_proxy. The urllib3 module ignores environment variables; to send your queries via a proxy you must create an instance of ProxyManager instead of PoolManager.
a
alvas

To get the content of a url:

try: # Try importing requests first.
    import requests
except ImportError: 
    try: # Try importing Python3 urllib
        import urllib.request
    except AttributeError: # Now importing Python2 urllib
        import urllib


def get_content(url):
    try:  # Using requests.
        return requests.get(url).content # Returns requests.models.Response.
    except NameError:  
        try: # Using Python3 urllib.
            with urllib.request.urlopen(index_url) as response:
                return response.read() # Returns http.client.HTTPResponse.
        except AttributeError: # Using Python3 urllib.
            return urllib.urlopen(url).read() # Returns an instance.

It's hard to write Python2 and Python3 and request dependencies code for the responses because they urlopen() functions and requests.get() function return different types:

Python2 urllib.request.urlopen() returns a http.client.HTTPResponse

Python3 urllib.urlopen(url) returns an instance

Request request.get(url) returns a requests.models.Response


P
Peter Mortensen

You should generally use urllib2, since this makes things a bit easier at times by accepting Request objects and will also raise a URLException on protocol errors. With Google App Engine though, you can't use either. You have to use the URL Fetch API that Google provides in its sandboxed Python environment.


What you said about appengine is not entirely true. You can actually use httplib, urllib, and urllib2 in App Engine now (they are wrappers for url fetch, done so that more code would be compatible with appengine.)
Ah, must be new. My code failed last I tried and had to be rewritten to work with fetch...
urllib2 doesn't exist at all in Python 3
@Boris It migrated to urllib.request and urllib.error.
p
paradocslover

A key point that I find missing in the above answers is that urllib returns an object of type <class http.client.HTTPResponse> whereas requests returns <class 'requests.models.Response'>.

Due to this, read() method can be used with urllib but not with requests.

P.S. : requests is already rich with so many methods that it hardly needs one more as read() ;>