ChatGPT解决这个技术问题 Extra ChatGPT

Multi-line string with extra space (preserved indentation)

I want to write some pre-defined texts to a file with the following:

text="this is line one\n
this is line two\n
this is line three"

echo -e $text > filename

I'm expecting something like this:

this is line one
this is line two
this is line three

But got this:

this is line one
 this is line two
 this is line three

I'm positive that there is no space after each \n, but how does the extra space come out?

I'm not sure but.. how if you just typed text="this is line one\nthis is line two\nthis is line three" in the same one line..? (without any enter)
Remove the \n on each line, you have already hit newline to move to the new line
You already given \n.So why you put next line in new line? Simply text="this is line one\nthis is line two\nthis is line three"
Removing the \n at the end of each line causes the output to all run together on a single line.
Aha: Putting double quotes around the "$text" in the echo line is crucial. Without them, none of the newlines (both literal and '\n') work. With them, they all do.

a
alphadog

Heredoc sounds more convenient for this purpose. It is used to send multiple commands to a command interpreter program like ex or cat

cat << EndOfMessage
This is line 1.
This is line 2.
Line 3.
EndOfMessage

The string after << indicates where to stop.

To send these lines to a file, use:

cat > $FILE <<- EOM
Line 1.
Line 2.
EOM

You could also store these lines to a variable:

read -r -d '' VAR << EOM
This is line 1.
This is line 2.
Line 3.
EOM

This stores the lines to the variable named VAR.

When printing, remember the quotes around the variable otherwise you won't see the newline characters.

echo "$VAR"

Even better, you can use indentation to make it stand out more in your code. This time just add a - after << to stop the tabs from appearing.

read -r -d '' VAR <<- EOM
    This is line 1.
    This is line 2.
    Line 3.
EOM

But then you must use tabs, not spaces, for indentation in your code.


why do you have <<- instead of << on the first line of the 2nd and 5th code block? does - do anything special?
@sup3rman '-' Ignores leading tabs. See stackoverflow.com/questions/2500436/…
how can I make read exit with status 0? It seems like it can't find end of line (since it's -d '') and exits with 1 which doesn't help when you are in script.
@MishaSlyusarev use -d '\0' and add a \0 at the end of your last line
Using the -d option in read -r -d '' VARIABLE <<- EOM did not work for me.
A
Andrew Miner

If you're trying to get the string into a variable, another easy way is something like this:

USAGE=$(cat <<-END
    This is line one.
    This is line two.
    This is line three.
END
)

If you indent your string with tabs (i.e., '\t'), the indentation will be stripped out. If you indent with spaces, the indentation will be left in.

NOTE: It is significant that the last closing parenthesis is on another line. The END text must appear on a line by itself.


Is is that significant? Works on my mac with ) on the same line. I think it's because what goes between $( and ) is gonna execute in its own universe, and the actual command won't see ')' anyway. I wonder if it works for others too.
It's possible that different shells will interpret things differently. In the bash documentation it doesn't seem to say anything one way or the other, but all the examples have it on its own line.
@deej From the POSIX spec: The here-document … continues until there is a line containing only the delimiter and a <newline>
@Fornost It does not contradict what I said
It's important to note the difference between echo $USAGE vs echo "$USAGE" when using this.
J
Josh Jolly

echo adds spaces between the arguments passed to it. $text is subject to variable expansion and word splitting, so your echo command is equivalent to:

echo -e "this" "is" "line" "one\n" "this" "is" "line" "two\n"  ...

You can see that a space will be added before "this". You can either remove the newline characters, and quote $text to preserve the newlines:

text="this is line one
this is line two
this is line three"

echo "$text" > filename

Or you could use printf, which is more robust and portable than echo:

printf "%s\n" "this is line one" "this is line two" "this is line three" > filename

In bash, which supports brace expansion, you could even do:

printf "%s\n" "this is line "{one,two,three} > filename

Thanks for explaining why mod sees extra space when using “echo” command. This answer also is working well when using in bash script (as oppose to interactive shell session). Feel like this is the real answer and should be an accepted answer.
This should be accepted answer. All other answers provided tons of interesting other ways to solve OP's pain, but technically the question was "how does the extra space come out" and no one addressed this :-) !!! Thank you, Josh for making -1 mystery!
C
Chris Maes

in a bash script the following works:

#!/bin/sh

text="this is line one\nthis is line two\nthis is line three"
echo -e $text > filename

alternatively:

text="this is line one
this is line two
this is line three"
echo "$text" > filename

cat filename gives:

this is line one
this is line two
this is line three

It seems the alternative trick works while Shell Scripts but it does not seem to work for bash.
@Macindows I seem to have forgotten the -e option for echo. Please try again.
M
Mateusz Piotrowski

I've found more solutions since I wanted to have every line properly indented:

You may use echo: echo "this is line one" \ "\n""this is line two" \ "\n""this is line three" \ > filename It does not work if you put "\n" just before \ on the end of a line. Alternatively, you can use printf for better portability (I happened to have a lot of problems with echo): printf '%s\n' \ "this is line one" \ "this is line two" \ "this is line three" \ > filename Yet another solution might be: text='' text="${text}this is line one\n" text="${text}this is line two\n" text="${text}this is line three\n" printf "%b" "$text" > filename or text='' text+="this is line one\n" text+="this is line two\n" text+="this is line three\n" printf "%b" "$text" > filename Another solution is achieved by mixing printf and sed. if something then printf '%s' ' this is line one this is line two this is line three ' | sed '1d;$d;s/^ //g' fi It is not easy to refactor code formatted like this as you hardcode the indentation level into the code. It is possible to use a helper function and some variable substitution tricks: unset text _() { text="${text}${text+ }${*}"; } # That's an empty line which demonstrates the reasoning behind # the usage of "+" instead of ":+" in the variable substitution # above. _ "" _ "this is line one" _ "this is line two" _ "this is line three" unset -f _ printf '%s' "$text"


3b is my preferred solution when wanting to preserve code indentation and string indentation independently, at least when I cannot use 2 in variable assignment, and is more readable than 3a. When I don't care I just keep the quoted string open over the several lines.
Very nice answer especially 3b
"It does not work if you put "\n" just before \ on the end of a line." - is a great tip when using echo.
printf saved me in a bare-bones docker container and no need for \n was really nice
F
Frank-Rene Schäfer

The following is my preferred way to assign a multi-line string to a variable (I think it looks nice).

read -r -d '' my_variable << \
_______________________________________________________________________________

String1
String2
String3
...
StringN
_______________________________________________________________________________

The number of underscores is the same (here 80) in both cases.


This is beautiful. Thanks!
F
Frank Bryce

I came hear looking for this answer but also wanted to pipe it to another command. The given answer is correct but if anyone wants to pipe it, you need to pipe it before the multi-line string like this

echo | tee /tmp/pipetest << EndOfMessage
This is line 1.
This is line 2.
Line 3.
EndOfMessage

This will allow you to have a multi line string but also put it in the stdin of a subsequent command.


G
Gabriel Staples

Hard to read:

This looks way too bash-like :) (hard to read) for my general taste:

cat << EndOfMessage
This is line 1.
This is line 2.
Line 3.
EndOfMessage

Better, easier-to-read:

Let's get something a little more Pythonic (this is still bash):

text="this is line one
      this is line two
      this is line three\n"
dedent text
printf "$text"             # print to screen
printf "$text" > file.txt  # print to a file

Ah...that's better. :) It reminds me of Python's textwrap.dedent() function which I use here.

Here is what the magic dedent function looks like:

dedent() {
    local -n reference="$1"
    reference="$(echo "$reference" | sed 's/^[[:space:]]*//')"
}

Sample output to screen:

this is line one
this is line two
this is line three

WithOUT calling dedent text first`, the output would look like this:

this is line one
      this is line two
      this is line three

The variable text is passed to dedent by reference, so that what is modified inside the function affects the variable outside the function.

For more details and explanation and references, see my other answer here: Equivalent of python's textwrap dedent in bash

Problem with your original attempt

OP's quote (with my emphasis added):

I'm positive that there is no space after each \n, but how does the extra space come out?

Your original attempt was this:

text="this is line one\n
this is line two\n
this is line three"
echo -e $text

...but your output had an extra space before the 2nd and 3rd line. Why?

By deduction and experimentation, my conclusion is that echo converts the actual newline at the end of the line (the one you got when you actually pressed Enter) into a space. That space therefore shows up before the line just after each \n in the text.

So, the solution is to escape the real newline at the end of each line by putting a backslash \ at the end of any line within the quotes of your string, like this:

text="this is line one\n\
this is line two\n\
this is line three"

echo -e "$text"

Do NOT put a space before those trailing backslashes (like this: text="this is line one\n \) or that space will go right back into your output and cause you the same problem with the extra space!

OR, just use my technique with the dedent function above, which also has the added functionality of being able to indent with your code to look really pretty and nice and readable.


B
Beni Trainor

There are many ways to do it. For me, piping the indented string into sed works nicely.

printf_strip_indent() {
   printf "%s" "$1" | sed "s/^\s*//g" 
}

printf_strip_indent "this is line one
this is line two
this is line three" > "file.txt"

This answer was based on Mateusz Piotrowski's answer but refined a bit.


l
luk

it will work if you put it as below:

AA='first line
\nsecond line 
\nthird line'
echo $AA
output:
first line
second line
third line

i
it3xl

Just to mention a simple one-line concatenation as it can be useful sometimes.

# for bash

v=" guga "$'\n'"   puga "

# Just for an example.
v2="bar "$'\n'"   foo "$'\n'"$v"

# Let's simplify the previous version of $v2.
n=$'\n'
v3="bar ${n}   foo ${n}$v"

echo "$v3" 

You'll get something like this

bar 
   foo 
 guga 
   puga

All leading and ending white spaces will be preserved right for

echo "$v3" > filename

i
ish-west

Or keeping text indented with whitespaces:

#!/bin/sh

sed 's/^[[:blank:]]*//' >filename <<EOF
    this is line one
    this is line two
    this is line three
EOF

Same but using a varible:

#!/bin/sh

text="$(sed 's/^[[:blank:]]*//' << whatever
    this is line one
    this is line two
    this is line three
)"

echo "$text" > filename

;-)