How to access host port from docker container [duplicate]

For all platforms

Docker v 20.10 and above (since December 14th 2020)

On Linux, add --add-host=host.docker.internal:host-gateway to your Docker command to enable this feature. (See below for Docker Compose configuration.)

Use your internal IP address or connect to the special DNS name host.docker.internal which will resolve to the internal IP address used by the host.

To enable this in Docker Compose on Linux, add the following lines to the container definition: extra_hosts: - "host.docker.internal:host-gateway"

For macOS and Windows

Docker v 18.03 and above (since March 21st 2018)

Use your internal IP address or connect to the special DNS name host.docker.internal which will resolve to the internal IP address used by the host.

Linux support pending https://github.com/docker/for-linux/issues/264

MacOS with earlier versions of Docker

Docker for Mac v 17.12 to v 18.02

Same as above but use docker.for.mac.host.internal instead.

Docker for Mac v 17.06 to v 17.11

Same as above but use docker.for.mac.localhost instead.

Docker for Mac 17.05 and below

To access host machine from the docker container you must attach an IP alias to your network interface. You can bind whichever IP you want, just make sure you're not using it to anything else.

sudo ifconfig lo0 alias 123.123.123.123/24

Then make sure that you server is listening to the IP mentioned above or 0.0.0.0. If it's listening on localhost 127.0.0.1 it will not accept the connection.

Then just point your docker container to this IP and you can access the host machine!

To test you can run something like curl -X GET 123.123.123.123:3000 inside the container.

The alias will reset on every reboot so create a start-up script if necessary.

Solution and more documentation here: https://docs.docker.com/docker-for-mac/networking/#use-cases-and-workarounds

---

When running Docker natively on Linux, you can access host services using the IP address of the docker0 interface. From inside the container, this will be your default route.

For example, on my system:

$ ip addr show docker0
7: docker0: <NO-CARRIER,BROADCAST,MULTICAST,UP> mtu 1500 qdisc noqueue state DOWN group default 
    link/ether 00:00:00:00:00:00 brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff
    inet 172.17.0.1/16 brd 172.17.255.255 scope global docker0
       valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever
    inet6 fe80::f4d2:49ff:fedd:28a0/64 scope link 
       valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever

And inside a container:

# ip route show
default via 172.17.0.1 dev eth0 
172.17.0.0/16 dev eth0  src 172.17.0.4 

It's fairly easy to extract this IP address using a simple shell script:

#!/bin/sh

hostip=$(ip route show | awk '/default/ {print $3}')
echo $hostip

You may need to modify the iptables rules on your host to permit connections from Docker containers. Something like this will do the trick:

# iptables -A INPUT -i docker0 -j ACCEPT

This would permit access to any ports on the host from Docker containers. Note that:

iptables rules are ordered, and this rule may or may not do the right thing depending on what other rules come before it.

you will only be able to access host services that are either (a) listening on INADDR_ANY (aka 0.0.0.0) or that are explicitly listening on the docker0 interface.

If you are using Docker on MacOS or Windows 18.03+, you can connect to the magic hostname host.docker.internal.

Lastly, under Linux you can run your container in the host network namespace by setting --net=host; in this case localhost on your host is the same as localhost inside the container, so containerized service will act like non-containerized services and will be accessible without any additional configuration.

---

Use --net="host" in your docker run command, then localhost in your docker container will point to your docker host.

---

For linux systems, you can – starting from major version 20.04 of the docker engine – now also communicate with the host via host.docker.internal. This won't work automatically, but you need to provide the following run flag:

--add-host=host.docker.internal:host-gateway

See

https://github.com/moby/moby/pull/40007#issuecomment-578729356

https://github.com/docker/for-linux/issues/264#issuecomment-598864064

---

The answer is...

Replace http://127.0.0.1 or http://localhost with http://host.docker.internal.

Why?

Source in the docs of Docker.

My google search brought me to here, and after digging in the comments I found it's a duplicate of From inside of a Docker container, how do I connect to the localhost of the machine?. I voted for closing this one as a duplicate, but since people (including myself!) often scroll down on the answers rather than reading the comments carefully, here is a short answer.

---

Solution with docker-compose: For accessing to host-based service, you can use network_mode parameter https://docs.docker.com/compose/compose-file/#network_mode

version: '3'
services:
  jenkins:
    network_mode: host

EDIT 2020-04-27: recommended for use only in local development environment.

EDIT 2021-09-21: IHaveHandedInMyResignation wrote it does not work for Mac and Windows. Option is supported only for Linux

---

I created a docker container for doing exactly that https://github.com/qoomon/docker-host

You can then simply use container name dns to access host system e.g. curl http://dockerhost:9200

---

Currently the easiest way to do this on Mac and Windows is using host host.docker.internal, that resolves to host machine's IP address. Unfortunately it does not work on linux yet (as of April 2018).

---

We found that a simpler solution to all this networking junk is to just use the domain socket for the service. If you're trying to connect to the host anyway, just mount the socket as a volume, and you're on your way. For postgresql, this was as simple as:

docker run -v /var/run/postgresql:/var/run/postgresql

Then we just set up our database connection to use the socket instead of network. Literally that easy.

---

I've explored the various solution and I find this the least hacky solution:

Define a static IP address for the bridge gateway IP. Add the gateway IP as an extra entry in the extra_hosts directive.

The only downside is if you have multiple networks or projects doing this, you have to ensure that their IP address range do not conflict.

Here is a Docker Compose example:

version: '2.3'

services:
  redis:
    image: "redis"
    extra_hosts:
      - "dockerhost:172.20.0.1"

networks:
  default:
    ipam:
      driver: default
      config:
      - subnet: 172.20.0.0/16
        gateway: 172.20.0.1

You can then access ports on the host from inside the container using the hostname "dockerhost".

---

For docker-compose using bridge networking to create a private network between containers, the accepted solution using docker0 doesn't work because the egress interface from the containers is not docker0, but instead, it's a randomly generated interface id, such as:

$ ifconfig

br-02d7f5ba5a51: flags=4163<UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,MULTICAST>  mtu 1500
        inet 192.168.32.1  netmask 255.255.240.0  broadcast 192.168.47.255

Unfortunately that random id is not predictable and will change each time compose has to recreate the network (e.g. on a host reboot). My solution to this is to create the private network in a known subnet and configure iptables to accept that range:

Compose file snippet:

version: "3.7"

services:
  mongodb:
    image: mongo:4.2.2
    networks:
    - mynet
    # rest of service config and other services removed for clarity

networks:
  mynet:
    name: mynet
    ipam:
      driver: default
      config:
      - subnet: "192.168.32.0/20"

You can change the subnet if your environment requires it. I arbitrarily selected 192.168.32.0/20 by using docker network inspect to see what was being created by default.

Configure iptables on the host to permit the private subnet as a source:

$ iptables -I INPUT 1 -s 192.168.32.0/20 -j ACCEPT

This is the simplest possible iptables rule. You may wish to add other restrictions, for example by destination port. Don't forget to persist your iptables rules when you're happy they're working.

This approach has the advantage of being repeatable and therefore automatable. I use ansible's template module to deploy my compose file with variable substitution and then use the iptables and shell modules to configure and persist the firewall rules, respectively.

---

This is an old question and had many answers, but none of those fit well enough to my context. In my case, the containers are very lean and do not contain any of the networking tools necessary to extract the host's ip address from within the container.

Also, usin the --net="host" approach is a very rough approach that is not applicable when one wants to have well isolated network configuration with several containers.

So, my approach is to extract the hosts' address at the host's side, and then pass it to the container with --add-host parameter:

$ docker run --add-host=docker-host:`ip addr show docker0 | grep -Po 'inet \K[\d.]+'` image_name

or, save the host's IP address in an environment variable and use the variable later:

$ DOCKERIP=`ip addr show docker0 | grep -Po 'inet \K[\d.]+'`
$ docker run --add-host=docker-host:$DOCKERIP image_name

And then the docker-host is added to the container's hosts file, and you can use it in your database connection strings or API URLs.

---

For me (Windows 10, Docker Engine v19.03.8) it was a mix of https://stackoverflow.com/a/43541732/7924573 and https://stackoverflow.com/a/50866007/7924573 .

change the host/ip to host.docker.internal e.g.: LOGGER_URL = "http://host.docker.internal:8085/log" set the network_mode to bridge (if you want to maintain the port forwarding; if not use host): version: '3.7' services: server: build: . ports: - "5000:5000" network_mode: bridge or alternatively: Use --net="bridge" if you are not using docker-compose (similar to https://stackoverflow.com/a/48806927/7924573) As pointed out in previous answers: This should only be used in a local development environment. For more information read: https://docs.docker.com/compose/compose-file/#network_mode and https://docs.docker.com/docker-for-windows/networking/#use-cases-and-workarounds

---

You can access the local webserver which is running in your host machine in two ways.

Approach 1 with public IP Use host machine public IP address to access webserver in Jenkins docker container. Approach 2 with the host network Use "--net host" to add the Jenkins docker container on the host's network stack. Containers which are deployed on host's stack have entire access to the host interface. You can access local webserver in docker container with a private IP address of the host machine.

NETWORK ID          NAME                      DRIVER              SCOPE
b3554ea51ca3        bridge                    bridge              local
2f0d6d6fdd88        host                      host                local
b9c2a4bc23b2        none                      null                local

Start a container with the host network Eg: docker run --net host -it ubuntu and run ifconfig to list all available network IP addresses which are reachable from docker container.

Eg: I started a nginx server in my local host machine and I am able to access the nginx website URLs from Ubuntu docker container.

docker run --net host -it ubuntu

$ docker ps
CONTAINER ID        IMAGE               COMMAND             CREATED             STATUS              PORTS               NAMES
a604f7af5e36        ubuntu              "/bin/bash"         22 seconds ago      Up 20 seconds                           ubuntu_server

Accessing the Nginx web server (running in local host machine) from Ubuntu docker container with private network IP address.

root@linuxkit-025000000001:/# curl 192.168.x.x -I
HTTP/1.1 200 OK
Server: nginx/1.15.10
Date: Tue, 09 Apr 2019 05:12:12 GMT
Content-Type: text/html
Content-Length: 612
Last-Modified: Tue, 26 Mar 2019 14:04:38 GMT
Connection: keep-alive
ETag: "5c9a3176-264"
Accept-Ranges: bytes

---

The simplest option that worked for me was, I used the IP address of my machine on the local network(assigned by the router)

You can find this using the ifconfig command

e.g

ifconfig

en0: flags=8863<UP,BROADCAST,SMART,RUNNING,SIMPLEX,MULTICAST> mtu 1500
        options=400<CHANNEL_IO>
        ether f0:18:98:08:74:d4 
        inet 192.168.178.63 netmask 0xffffff00 broadcast 192.168.178.255
        media: autoselect
        status: active

and then used the inet address. This worked for me to connect any ports on my machine.

---

In almost 7 years the question was asked, it is either docker has changed, or no one tried this way. So I will include my own answer.

I have found all answers use complex methods. Today, I have needed this, and found 2 very simple ways:

use ipconfig or ifconfig on your host and make note of all IP addresses. At least two of them can be used by the container. I have a fixed local network address on WiFi LAN Adapter: 192.168.1.101. This could be 10.0.1.101. the result will change depending on your router I use WSL on windows, and it has its own vEthernet address: 172.19.192.1

I have a fixed local network address on WiFi LAN Adapter: 192.168.1.101. This could be 10.0.1.101. the result will change depending on your router

I use WSL on windows, and it has its own vEthernet address: 172.19.192.1

use host.docker.internal. Most answers have this or another form of it depending on OS. The name suggests it is now globally used by docker.

A third option is to use WAN address of the machine, or in other words IP given by the service provider. However, this may not work if IP is not static, and requires routing and firewall settings.

PS: Although pretty identical to this question here, and I posted this answer there, I first found this post, so I post it here too as may forget my own answer.

---

When you have two docker images "already" created and you want to put two containers to communicate with one-another.

For that, you can conveniently run each container with its own --name and use the --link flag to enable communication between them. You do not get this during docker build though.

When you are in a scenario like myself, and it is your

docker build -t "centos7/someApp" someApp/ 

That breaks when you try to

curl http://172.17.0.1:localPort/fileIWouldLikeToDownload.tar.gz > dump.tar.gz

and you get stuck on "curl/wget" returning no "route to host".

The reason is security that is set in place by docker that by default is banning communication from a container towards the host or other containers running on your host. This was quite surprising to me, I must say, you would expect the echosystem of docker machines running on a local machine just flawlessly can access each other without too much hurdle.

The explanation for this is described in detail in the following documentation.

http://www.dedoimedo.com/computers/docker-networking.html

Two quick workarounds are given that help you get moving by lowering down the network security.

The simplest alternative is just to turn the firewall off - or allow all. This means running the necessary command, which could be systemctl stop firewalld, iptables -F or equivalent.

---