ChatGPT解决这个技术问题 Extra ChatGPT

How can I do a case insensitive string comparison?

How can I make the line below case insensitive?

drUser["Enrolled"] = 
      (enrolledUsers.FindIndex(x => x.Username == (string)drUser["Username"]) != -1);

I was given some advice earlier today that suggested I use:

x.Username.Equals((string)drUser["Username"], StringComparison.OrdinalIgnoreCase)));

the trouble is I can't get this to work, I've tried the line below, this compiles but returns the wrong results, it returns enrolled users as unenrolled and unenrolled users as enrolled.

drUser["Enrolled"] = 
      (enrolledUsers.FindIndex(x => x.Username.Equals((string)drUser["Username"], 
                                 StringComparison.OrdinalIgnoreCase)));

Can anyone point out the problem?

What data type should drUser["Enrolled"] be? It looks like a boolean value, but FindIndex() returns the index. If the index of that user is 0, then it will return 0, which may be false. When, in reality is is true. The Exists() method may be better in this case.
Are you sure there isn't some time of formatting or an extra space in one field that isn't in the other?
I'd suggest using enrolledUsers.Any() instead of FindIndex (and test).

L
Liam

This is not the best practice in .NET framework (4 & +) to check equality

String.Compare(x.Username, (string)drUser["Username"], 
                  StringComparison.OrdinalIgnoreCase) == 0

Use the following instead

String.Equals(x.Username, (string)drUser["Username"], 
                   StringComparison.OrdinalIgnoreCase) 

MSDN recommends:

Use an overload of the String.Equals method to test whether two strings are equal. Use the String.Compare and String.CompareTo methods to sort strings, not to check for equality.


You should use string.Compare, not String.Compare.
@Fred I agree but can you qualify the reason?
@Fred I was hoping for a technical reason rather than 'because Stylecop says so'. Am I missing something?
no difference string.compare with String.Compare, string synonyms System.String class. and member Compare is an extension method.@Fred @Gusdor
@Gusdor string is better practice than String since it is a language keyword. For one, String could be something other than System.String, whereas string cannot be. Also, string is more or less guaranteed to exist in C#, whereas String is technically part of .NET rather than C#.
O
Oleg

You should use static String.Compare function like following

x => String.Compare (x.Username, (string)drUser["Username"],
                     StringComparison.OrdinalIgnoreCase) == 0

No, you should use String.Equals instead of String.Compare. There's no need to compute which one is greater, just that they are not equal.
@ErikE: I'm wonder, which method you will recommend to use in 6 years more :-)
I don't wonder! I'm confident I'll recommend using equality when you want equality semantics, and using compare when you want comparison semantics. What's so difficult about that? IEquatable and IComparable do NOT do the same thing, and you can have classes that implement one but in which it would make NO sense to implement the other. For example, you could order sensor samplings by time without any of them being equal (IComparable). And, you can indicate whether things are equal (IEquatable) but it makes no sense to order them (say, computer serial numbers).
@ErikE: You don't understand my point of view. Old answers corresponds the time of writing. One should not touch old answers. It's true about the most products. The best practice or the best choice from performance point of view can be changed multiple times later. I see no sense to discuss about any old answer.
My apologies, I took it as a critique on the correctness of my comment. If what you're saying is that you admit your old answer may not be the best one, then great! However, I have to disagree with you about old answers. Old answers that give poor information should be commented on, should be down-voted, because they are still informing today's readers.
B
Broots Waymb

Please use this for comparison:

string.Equals(a, b, StringComparison.CurrentCultureIgnoreCase);

Just be aware of the advantages and pitfalls of using CurrentCultureIgnoreCase vs. OrdinalIgnoreCase. If you don't need the semantics of culture comparison, save some performance and use ordinal comparison.
T
TarmoPikaro

Others answer are totally valid here, but somehow it takes some time to type StringComparison.OrdinalIgnoreCase and also using String.Compare.

I've coded simple String extension method, where you could specify if comparison is case sensitive or case senseless with boolean, attaching whole code snippet here:

using System;

/// <summary>
/// String helpers.
/// </summary>
public static class StringExtensions
{
    /// <summary>
    /// Compares two strings, set ignoreCase to true to ignore case comparison ('A' == 'a')
    /// </summary>
    public static bool CompareTo(this string strA, string strB, bool ignoreCase)
    {
        return String.Compare(strA, strB, ignoreCase) == 0;
    }
}

After that whole comparison shortens by 10 characters approximately - compare:

Before using String extension:

String.Compare(testFilename, testToStart,true) != 0

After using String extension:

testFilename.CompareTo(testToStart, true)

I disagree with the naming, compare is a well known function in software dev and you've fundamentally changed what it does. I think you should either return an int like compare or change the name to something else, 'IsEqual' for example.
A
Andre Kampling

You can (although controverse) extend System.String to provide a case insensitive comparison extension method:

public static bool CIEquals(this String a, String b) {
    return a.Equals(b, StringComparison.CurrentCultureIgnoreCase);
}

and use as such:

x.Username.CIEquals((string)drUser["Username"]);

C# allows you to create extension methods that can serve as syntax suggar in your project, quite useful I'd say.

It's not the answer and I know this question is old and solved, I just wanted to add these bits.


R
Ranga

I'd like to write an extension method for EqualsIgnoreCase

public static class StringExtensions
{
    public static bool? EqualsIgnoreCase(this string strA, string strB)
    {
        return strA?.Equals(strB, StringComparison.CurrentCultureIgnoreCase);
    }
}

I
I_Al-thamary

I think you will find more information in this link:

http://codeidol.com/community/dotnet/controlling-case-sensitivity-when-comparing-two-st/8873/

Use the Compare static method on the String class to compare the two strings. Whether the comparison is case-insensitive is determined by the third parameter of one of its overloads. For example:

string lowerCase = "abc";
string upperCase = "AbC";
int caseInsensitiveResult = string.Compare(lowerCase, upperCase,
  StringComparison.CurrentCultureIgnoreCase);
int caseSensitiveResult = string.Compare(lowerCase,
  StringComparison.CurrentCulture);

The caseSensitiveResult value is -1 (indicating that lowerCase is "less than" upperCase) and the caseInsensitiveResult is zero (indicating that lowerCase "equals" upperCase).


d
decyclone

How about using StringComparison.CurrentCultureIgnoreCase instead?


-1: This answer is insufficient. Please see @ocean4dream's answer: stackoverflow.com/a/13965429/109941.
@decyclone: It's slower than OrdinalIgnoreCase, but maybe relevant in some cases. Therefore I won't give -1. stackoverflow.com/questions/2749662/…
u
user3895427

you can always use functions: .ToLower(); .ToUpper();

convert your strings and then compare them...

Good Luck


I do not think this would solve his problem. Also mark that this question is already more than 4 years old.
This creates a new string, so I consider this very inefficient. Because to create this new string all characters will be checked and converts to the desired case, then the comparision has to check all the characters again. So it uses more memory and processing power.
This is very bad practice because of the memory allocation.
Not only this is unnecessary memory allocation and inefficient; it also fails the Turkey test.
This can be a very valuable approach in some circumstances. Specifically, where you plan to compare the string to many others, perhaps with a switch() or elseif ladder (eg when checking against a list of commands that you control, so know won't be affected by I18N lowercasing issues; or against a wordle wordlist). Doing every compare case-insensitively may not be very performant, but more importantly, isn't as readable as str == "a" or case "a", or a hashtable check. For the question at hand, though... yeah, best to do it the Right Way.