ChatGPT解决这个技术问题 Extra ChatGPT

How to add multiple classes to a ReactJS Component?

I am new to ReactJS and JSX and I am having a little problem with the code below.

I am trying to add multiple classes to the className attribute on each li:

<li key={index} className={activeClass, data.class, "main-class"}></li>

My React component is:

var AccountMainMenu = React.createClass({
  getInitialState: function() {
    return { focused: 0 };
  },

  clicked: function(index) {
    this.setState({ focused: index });
  },

  render: function() {
    var self = this;
    var accountMenuData = [
      {
        name: "My Account",
        icon: "icon-account"
      },
      {
        name: "Messages",
        icon: "icon-message"
      },
      {
        name: "Settings",
        icon: "icon-settings"
      }
    /*{
        name:"Help &amp; Support &nbsp; <span class='font-awesome icon-support'></span>(888) 664.6261",
        listClass:"no-mobile last help-support last"
      }*/
    ];

    return (
      <div className="acc-header-wrapper clearfix">
        <ul className="acc-btns-container">
          {accountMenuData.map(function(data, index) {
            var activeClass = "";

            if (self.state.focused == index) {
              activeClass = "active";
            }

            return (
              <li
                key={index}
                className={activeClass}
                onClick={self.clicked.bind(self, index)}
              >
                <a href="#" className={data.icon}>
                  {data.name}
                </a>
              </li>
            );
          })}
        </ul>
      </div>
    );
  }
});

ReactDOM.render(<AccountMainMenu />, document.getElementById("app-container"));
I found a breif answer here stackoverflow.com/a/36209517/4125588, just use JavaScript to join this classes, static or dynamic, with '+' operator, remember to insert ' ' before the classes except the first one, as the real class in HTML should be like 'a b c', also space between them.
Why don't classNames={{foo: true, bar: true, baz: false}} and classNames={["foo", "bar"]} just work?
Then why are you assigning only one class name "active" to the li element?
You can check out npmjs.com/package/@ivanhanak_com/react-join-classnames, where basically you can use <div className={classes(isTrue && "willRenderThisClass")} />

D
Damian Pavlica

I use ES6 template literals. For example:

const error = this.state.valid ? '' : 'error'
const classes = `form-control round-lg ${error}`

And then just render it:

<input className={classes} />

One-liner version:

<input className={`form-control round-lg ${this.state.valid ? '' : 'error'}`} />

This results in <input class=" form-control input-lg round-lg" />. Do note the extra space in beginning. This is valid, but ugly. Even react FAQ recommends another way or using the classnames package: reactjs.org/docs/faq-styling.html
I can't comprehend why you'd import a library (as in the accepted answer) to just set some classes that can be set using Vanilla JavaScript, which is a more efficient, cleaner, and readable solution, anyways.
This is the correct answer. Using a dependency for this as suggested in the "correct" answer is overkill.
I always love this answer but don't like that extra space in the end in case of falsy values. You can easily avoid then with trim().
@CodyMoniz and this answer guided me in the right direction! I had a situation where I needed to add multiple "variable" classes. className={ `${ props.variable } ${ props.variabletwo }` } worked! hours of not knowing how to search for this, remedied by this answer.
J
Jack

I use classnames when there is a fair amount of logic required for deciding the classes to (not) use. An overly simple example:

...
    var liClasses = classNames({
      'main-class': true,
      'activeClass': self.state.focused === index
    });

    return (<li className={liClasses}>{data.name}</li>);
...

That said, if you don't want to include a dependency then there are better answers below.


That's too bad you had to bring in a library of classnames just to add two classes to an element :(
@user959690 This is an example. This library is very nice when you're doing these things a lot and you have complex logic on when classes need to be applied or not. If you're doing something simple then sure just use templates, but every case is different and the reader should pick the right tool for their job.
@user959690 It's worth noting that it is now installed by NPM when using Webpack, so import classNames from 'classnames' then to use in a component className={classNames(classes.myFirstClass, classes.mySecondClass)} .
No need to use an external library, see my answer below.
Library has other advantages : var btnClass = classNames({ btn: true, 'btn-pressed': this.state.isPressed, 'btn-over': !this.state.isPressed && this.state.isHovered }); return <button className={btnClass}>{this.props.label}</button>;
0
0xcaff

Just use JavaScript.

<li className={[activeClass, data.klass, "main-class"].join(' ')} />

If you want to add classes based keys and values in an object you can use the following:

function classNames(classes) {
  return Object.entries(classes)
    .filter(([key, value]) => value)
    .map(([key, value]) => key)
    .join(' ');
}

const classes = {
  'maybeClass': true,
  'otherClass': true,
  'probablyNotClass': false,
};

const myClassNames = classNames(classes);
// Output: "maybeClass otherClass"

<li className={myClassNames} />

Or even simpler:

const isEnabled = true;
const isChecked = false;

<li className={[isEnabled && 'enabled', isChecked && 'checked']
  .filter(e => !!e)
  .join(' ')
} />
// Output:
// <li className={'enabled'} />

Here is the line that worked for me: className={['terra-Table', medOrder.resource.status]}
@DougWilhelm I don't think that works. It implicitly calls toString and creates a comma separated list of classes. github.com/facebook/react/issues/3138
Good idea to use className={[listOfClasses].join(' ')} it's working for me thanks!
I prefer even more sexier version of className={[activeClass, data.klass, "main-class"].filter(Boolean).join(' ')}
@0xcaff works perfectly
J
Jamie Hutber

Concat

No need to be fancy I am using CSS modules and it's easy

import style from '/css/style.css';

<div className={style.style1+ ' ' + style.style2} />

This will result in:

<div class="src-client-css-pages-style1-selectionItem src-client-css-pages-style2">

In other words, both styles

Conditionals

It would be easy to use the same idea with if's

const class1 = doIHaveSomething ? style.style1 : 'backupClass';

<div className={class1 + ' ' + style.style2} />

ES6

For the last year or so I have been using the template literals, so I feel its worth mentioning, i find it very expressive and easy to read:

`${class1} anotherClass ${class1}`

This worked for me, along with '-' names, ie:
LOL, i crack my head and the answer is simple concat :D. Btw this alsow work with CSS Loader Module
The problem with that is that you can't have optional classes (if undefined, then it will not be added), so it depends wither you are sure your class is not null (not optional). In case of optional there isn't better then a helper like classes(). we can use a ternary with templates like that className={slider${className? ` ${className}: ''}}``. But it's a lot. [note: 'something '+undefined = 'something underfined'. Js dynamic conversion.
Sure you can, just declare a variable above and use it conditionally :)
Forgot everything is actually just JavaScript and never tried this. Thanks, was a great help.
C
Cody Moniz

This can be achieved with ES6 template literals:

<input className={`base-input-class ${class1} ${class2}`}>

(edited for clarity)


this almost worked for me I just had to interpolate the class1 too and no more errors, so it looks like this <input className={`${class1} ${class2}`}>
So if class1 does not exist, you end up with that large white space in the middle.
Yes, this would end up with whitespace. If you don't want whitespace you can use: <input className={['base-input-class', class1, class2].filter(x => x).join(' ')} />
n
nightlyop

You can create an element with multiple class names like this:

<li className="class1 class2 class3">foo</li>

Naturally, you can use a string containing the class names and manipulate this string to update the class names of the element.

var myClassNammes = 'class1 class2 class3';
...
<li className={myClassNames}>foo</li>

Did you test this? I did :)
Yes I did. Actually, I'm using it quite often but just saw and corrected a typo. Of course the string containing the class names in the first line has to be made using " instead of '. Sorry about that.
H
Hristo Eftimov

This is how you can do that with ES6:

className = {`
      text-right
      ${itemId === activeItemId ? 'active' : ''}
      ${anotherProperty === true ? 'class1' : 'class2'}
`}

You can list multiple classes and conditions and also you can include static classes. It is not necessary to add an additional library.

Good luck ;)


This results in very ugly HTML, considering all the extra whitespace.
It is not necessary to written like that. This is just an example that better explain the solution. And always in production you have the minified version :)
string literals will not be minified in production.
H
Huw Davies

Vanilla JS

No need for external libraries - just use ES6 template strings:

<i className={`${styles['foo-bar-baz']} fa fa-user fa-2x`}/>

Vanilla JS is NOT ES6. But I do like your example.
@RyanNerd Do you mean "ES6 is not vanilla JS"? Anyway, it is, because vanilla js means javascript without any frameworks. ES6 is a newer version of javascript. - stackoverflow.com/a/20435685/5111113
Not a wrong answer but could be improved a lot. For example, everyone else added examples about states.
This looks quite clean, and better for this simple case for sure. But worth mentioning that when there are multiple classes that depends on states, template strings can become quite hard to write and worst to read. In those cases, using classnames library would make life easier. But again, for a simple example like that, template strings is the way to go for sure!
P
Pasham Akhil Kumar Reddy

I don't think we need to use an external package for just adding multiple classes.

I personally use

<li className={`li active`}>Stacy</li>

or

<li className={`li ${this.state.isActive ? 'active' : ''}`}>Stacy<li>

or

<li className={'li ' + (this.state.isActive ? 'active' : '') }>Stacy<li>

the second and third one in case you need to add or remove classes conditionally.


this will add only one class either way.
@TrickOrTreat not true. all of the examples above will add two classes (provided isActive is true).
Why are there other answers at all besides this one?
a
ashuvssut

Generally people do like

<div className={  `head ${style.class1} ${Style.class2}`  }><div>

OR

<div className={  'head ' + style.class1 + ' ' + Style.class2 }><div>

OR

<div className={  ['head', style.class1 , Style.class2].join(' ')  }><div>

But you can choose to Create a function to do this job

function joinAll(...classes) {
  return classes.join(" ")
}

then call it like:-

<div className={joinAll('head', style.class1 , style.class2)}><div>

x
xsong

Maybe classnames can help you.

var classNames = require('classnames');
classNames('foo', {'xx-test': true, bar: false}, {'ox-test': false}); // => 'foo xx-test'

Can you make this example more usable.
I believe clsx(npmjs.com/package/clsx) is a good alternative to classnames.
A
Alberto Perez

You could do the following:

<li key={index} className={`${activeClass} ${data.class} main-class`}></li>

A short and simple solution, hope this helps.


IMO this is the best answer! :)
Y
Yanga

It can be done with https://www.npmjs.com/package/clsx :

https://www.npmjs.com/package/clsx

First install it:

npm install --save clsx

Then import it in your component file:

import clsx from  'clsx';

Then use the imported function in your component:

<div className={ clsx(classes.class1, classes.class2)}>

H
Himanshu Jariyal

Just adding, we can filter out empty strings.

className={[
    'read-more-box',
    this.props.className,
    this.state.isExpanded ? 'open' : 'close',
].filter(x => !!x).join(' ')}

a
arvinda kumar

You can create an element with multiple class names like this, I tryed these both way, its working fine...

If you importing any css then you can follow this way : Way 1:

import React, { Component, PropTypes } from 'react';
import csjs from 'csjs';
import styles from './styles';
import insertCss from 'insert-css';
import classNames from 'classnames';
insertCss(csjs.getCss(styles));
export default class Foo extends Component {
  render() {
    return (
      <div className={[styles.class1, styles.class2].join(' ')}>
        { 'text' }
      </div>
    );
  }
}

way 2:

import React, { Component, PropTypes } from 'react';
import csjs from 'csjs';
import styles from './styles';
import insertCss from 'insert-css';
import classNames from 'classnames';
insertCss(csjs.getCss(styles));
export default class Foo extends Component {
  render() {
    return (
      <div className={styles.class1 + ' ' + styles.class2}>
        { 'text' }
      </div>
    );
  }
}

**

If you applying css as internal :

const myStyle = { color: "#fff" }; // React Element using Jsx const myReactElement = (

Hello World!

); ReactDOM.render(myReactElement, document.getElementById("app")); .myClassName { background-color: #333; padding: 10px; } .myClassName1{ border: 2px solid #000; }


.join(' ') was nice. But we can avoid that and use template strings className={${styles.class1} ${styles.class2}}
R
ROOT

for more classes adding

... className={`${classes.hello} ${classes.hello1}`...

A
Achintha Isuru

I know this is a late answer, but I hope this will help someone.

Consider that you have defined following classes in a css file 'primary', 'font-i', 'font-xl'

The first step would be to import the CSS file.

Then

HELLO WORLD

would do the trick!

For more info: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j5P9FHiBVNo&list=PLC3y8-rFHvwgg3vaYJgHGnModB54rxOk3&index=20


a
atazmin

This seem to work for me

<Link className={[classes.button, classes.buttonFirst]}>

in TypeScript this gives me : Type 'string[]' is not assignable to type 'string'.
j
jasonleonhard

Using CSS Modules (or Sass Modules) you can isolate your styling to a specific component too.

"Component-scoped CSS allows you to write traditional, portable CSS with minimal side effects: gone are the worries of selector name collisions or affecting other components’ styles."

import * as styles from "./whatever.module.css"  // css version
import * as styles from "./whatever.module.scss" // sass version

<div className={`${styles.class1} ${styles.class2}`}>
   INSERT YOUR CODE HERE
</div>

Ref1 Ref2


s
scazzy

Late to the party, but why use third party for such a simple problem?

You could either do it as @Huw Davies mentioned - the best way

1. <i className={`${styles['foo-bar-baz']} fa fa-user fa-2x`}/>
2. <i className={[styles['foo-bar-baz'], 'fa fa-user', 'fa-2x'].join(' ')}

Both are good. But writing can become complex for a large app. To make it optimal, I do the same above things but put it in a helper class

Using my below helper function, allows me to keep the logic separate for future editing, and also gives me multiple ways to add the classes

classNames(styles['foo-bar-baz], 'fa fa-user', 'fa-2x')

or

classNames([styles['foo-bar-baz], 'fa fa-user', 'fa-2x'])

This is my helper function below. I've put it in a helper.js where I keep all my common methods. Being such a simple function, I avoided using 3rd party to keep control

export function classNames (classes) {
    if(classes && classes.constructor === Array) {
        return classes.join(' ')
    } else if(arguments[0] !== undefined) {
        return [...arguments].join(' ')
    }
    return ''
}

V
Vinay Jariya

You can use arrays and then join them using space.

<li key={index} className={[activeClass, data.class, "main-class"].join(' ')}></li>

This will result in :

<li key={index} class="activeClass data.class main-class"></li>

h
himansa eshan

Create a function like this

function cssClass(...c) {
  return c.join(" ")
}

Call it when needed.

<div className={cssClass("head",Style.element,"black")}><div>

M
Michael Murphy

When I have many varying classes, I have found the following to be useful.

The filter removes any of the null values and the join puts all the remaining values into a space separated string.

const buttonClasses = [
    "Button", 
    disabled ? "disabled" : null,
    active ? "active" : null
].filter((class) => class).join(" ")

<button className={buttonClasses} onClick={onClick} disabled={disabled ? disabled : false}>

V
Vlad Bezden

Using facebook's TodoTextInput.js example

render() {
    return (
      <input className={
        classnames({
          edit: this.props.editing,
          'new-todo': this.props.newTodo
        })}
        type="text"
        placeholder={this.props.placeholder}
        autoFocus="true"
        value={this.state.text}
        onBlur={this.handleBlur}
        onChange={this.handleChange}
        onKeyDown={this.handleSubmit} />
    )
  } 

replacing classnames with plain vanilla js code will look like this:

render() {
    return (
      <input
        className={`
          ${this.props.editing ? 'edit' : ''} ${this.props.newTodo ? 'new-todo' : ''}
        `}
        type="text"
        placeholder={this.props.placeholder}
        autoFocus="true"
        value={this.state.text}
        onBlur={this.handleBlur}
        onChange={this.handleChange}
        onKeyDown={this.handleSubmit} />
    )
  }

S
Seth

If you don't feel like importing another module, this function works like the classNames module.

function classNames(rules) {
    var classes = ''

    Object.keys(rules).forEach(item => {    
        if (rules[item])
            classes += (classes.length ? ' ' : '') + item
    })

    return classes
} 

You can use it like this:

render() {
    var classes = classNames({
        'storeInfoDiv': true,  
        'hover': this.state.isHovered == this.props.store.store_id
    })   

    return (
        <SomeComponent style={classes} />
    )
}

Why use closures if you can do the same with map or reduce? function classNames(rules) { return Object.entries(rules) .reduce( (arr, [cls, flag]) => { if (flag) arr.push(cls); return arr }, [] ).join(" ") }
J
Jitesh Prajapati

Use https://www.npmjs.com/package/classnames

import classNames from 'classnames';

Can use multiple classes using comas seperated:

  • Total
  • Can use multiple classes using comas separated with condition:
  • Hello World
  • Using array as props to classNames will also work, but gives warning e.g.

    className={[classes.tableCellLabel, classes.tableCell]}
    

    Duplicate of another existing answer.
    C
    Caleb Hensley

    clsx makes this simple!

    "The clsx function can take any number of arguments, each of which can be an Object, Array, Boolean, or String." -- clsx docs on npmjs.com

    Import it:

    import clsx from 'clsx'
    

    Use it:

    <li key={index} className={clsx(activeClass, data.class, "main-class")}></li>
    

    S
    Saurav gupta

    I used this syntax

        <div
          className={[
            "d-inline-flex justify-content-center align-items-center ",
            withWrapper && `ft-icon-wrapper ft-icon-wrapper-${size}`,
            wrapperClass,
          ].join(" ")}
        >
          <img
            className={`ft-icon ft-icon-${size} ${iconClass}`}
            alt={id}
            src={icon}
          />
        </div>
    

    Both solutions (join and template literals) were already suggested. Please explain how yours is different
    R
    RegarBoy

    That's what I do:

    Component:

    const Button = ({ className }) => (
      <div className={ className }> </div>
    );
    

    Calling Component:

    <Button className = 'hashButton free anotherClass' />
    

    D
    Devakhim

    I am using React 16.6.3 and @Material UI 3.5.1, and is able to use arrays in className like className={[classes.tableCell, classes.capitalize]}

    So in your example, the following would be similar.

    <li key={index} className={[activeClass, data.class, "main-class"]}></li>
    

    This is what I was doing (albeit no MUI) and doesn't work, only applies the first class - no warning or complain.