Chrome / Safari not filling 100% height of flex parent

Solution

Use nested flex containers.

Get rid of percentage heights. Get rid of table properties. Get rid of vertical-align. Avoid absolute positioning. Just stick with flexbox all the way through.

Apply display: flex to the flex item (.item), making it a flex container. This automatically sets align-items: stretch, which tells the child (.item-inner) to expand the full height of the parent.

Important: Remove specified heights from flex items for this method to work. If a child has a height specified (e.g. height: 100%), then it will ignore the align-items: stretch coming from the parent. For the stretch default to work, the child's height must compute to auto (full explanation).

Try this (no changes to HTML):

.container { display: flex; flex-direction: column; height: 20em; border: 5px solid black } .item { display: flex; /* new; nested flex container */ flex: 1; border-bottom: 1px solid white; } .item-inner { display: flex; /* new; nested flex container */ flex: 1; /* new */ /* height: 100%; <-- remove; unnecessary */ /* width: 100%; <-- remove; unnecessary */ /* display: table; <-- remove; unnecessary */ } a { display: flex; /* new; nested flex container */ flex: 1; /* new */ align-items: center; /* new; vertically center text */ background: orange; /* display: table-cell; <-- remove; unnecessary */ /* vertical-align: middle; <-- remove; unnecessary */ }

jsFiddle demo

Explanation

My problem is that .item-inner { height: 100% } is not working in webkit (Chrome).

It's not working because you're using percentage height in a way that doesn't conform with the traditional implementation of the spec.

10.5 Content height: the height property percentage Specifies a percentage height. The percentage is calculated with respect to the height of the generated box's containing block. If the height of the containing block is not specified explicitly and this element is not absolutely positioned, the value computes to auto. auto The height depends on the values of other properties.

In other words, for percentage height to work on an in-flow child, the parent must have a set height.

In your code, the top-level container has a defined height: .container { height: 20em; }

The third-level container has a defined height: .item-inner { height: 100%; }

But between them, the second-level container – .item – does not have a defined height. Webkit sees that as a missing link.

.item-inner is telling Chrome: give me height: 100%. Chrome looks to the parent (.item) for reference and responds: 100% of what? I don't see anything (ignoring the flex: 1 rule that is there). As a result, it applies height: auto (content height), in accordance with the spec.

Firefox, on the other hand, now accepts a parent's flex height as a reference for the child's percentage height. IE11 and Edge accept flex heights, as well.

Also, Chrome will accept flex-grow as an adequate parent reference if used in conjunction with flex-basis (any numerical value works (auto won't), including flex-basis: 0). As of this writing, however, this solution fails in Safari.

#outer { display: flex; flex-direction: column; height: 300px; background-color: white; border: 1px solid red; } #middle { flex-grow: 1; flex-basis: 1px; background-color: yellow; } #inner { height: 100%; background-color: lightgreen; }

Four Solutions

1. Specify a height on all parent elements

A reliable cross-browser solution is to specify a height on all parent elements. This prevents missing links, which Webkit-based browsers consider a violation of the spec.

Note that min-height and max-height are not acceptable. It must be the height property.

More details here: Working with the CSS height property and percentage values

2. CSS Relative & Absolute Positioning

Apply position: relative to the parent and position: absolute to the child.

Size the child with height: 100% and width: 100%, or use the offset properties: top: 0, right: 0, bottom: 0, left: 0.

With absolute positioning, percentage height works without a specified height on the parent.

3. Remove unnecessary HTML containers (recommended)

Is there a need for two containers around button? Why not remove .item or .item-inner, or both? Although button elements sometimes fail as flex containers, they can be flex items. Consider making button a child of .container or .item, and removing gratuitous mark-up.

Here's an example:

.container { height: 20em; display: flex; flex-direction: column; border: 5px solid black } a { flex: 1; background: orange; border-bottom: 1px solid white; display: flex; /* nested flex container (for aligning text) */ align-items: center; /* center text vertically */ justify-content: center; /* center text horizontally */ }

4. Nested Flex Containers (recommended)

Get rid of percentage heights. Get rid of table properties. Get rid of vertical-align. Avoid absolute positioning. Just stick with flexbox all the way through.

Apply display: flex to the flex item (.item), making it a flex container. This automatically sets align-items: stretch, which tells the child (.item-inner) to expand the full height of the parent.

Important: Remove specified heights from flex items for this method to work. If a child has a height specified (e.g. height: 100%), then it will ignore the align-items: stretch coming from the parent. For the stretch default to work, the child's height must compute to auto (full explanation).

Try this (no changes to HTML):

.container { display: flex; flex-direction: column; height: 20em; border: 5px solid black } .item { display: flex; /* new; nested flex container */ flex: 1; border-bottom: 1px solid white; } .item-inner { display: flex; /* new; nested flex container */ flex: 1; /* new */ /* height: 100%; <-- remove; unnecessary */ /* width: 100%; <-- remove; unnecessary */ /* display: table; <-- remove; unnecessary */ } a { display: flex; /* new; nested flex container */ flex: 1; /* new */ align-items: center; /* new; vertically center text */ background: orange; /* display: table-cell; <-- remove; unnecessary */ /* vertical-align: middle; <-- remove; unnecessary */ }

jsFiddle

---

Specifying a flex attribute to the container worked for me:

.container {
    flex: 0 0 auto;
}

This ensures the height is set and doesn't grow either.

---

Solution: Remove height: 100% in .item-inner and add display: flex in .item

Demo: https://codepen.io/tronghiep92/pen/NvzVoo

---

For Mobile Safari There is a Browser fix. you need to add -webkit-box for iOS devices.

Ex.

display: flex;
display: -webkit-box;
flex-direction: column;
-webkit-box-orient: vertical;
-webkit-box-direction: normal;
-webkit-flex-direction: column;
align-items: stretch;

if you're using align-items: stretch; property for parent element, remove the height : 100% from the child element.

---

I have had a similar issue in iOS 8, 9 and 10 and the info above couldn't fix it, however I did discover a solution after a day of working on this. Granted it won't work for everyone but in my case my items were stacked in a column and had 0 height when it should have been content height. Switching the css to be row and wrap fixed the issue. This only works if you have a single item and they are stacked but since it took me a day to find this out I thought I should share my fix!

.wrapper {
    flex-direction: column; // <-- Remove this line
    flex-direction: row; // <-- replace it with
    flex-wrap: wrap; // <-- Add wrapping
}

.item {
    width: 100%;
}

---