ChatGPT解决这个技术问题 Extra ChatGPT

How can I position my div at the bottom of its container?

Given the following HTML:

I would like #copyright to stick to the bottom of #container. Can I achieve this without using absolute positioning?

This situation is one of the reasons why layout tables are not yet gone. Doing this with a table is dead simple and works everywhere. Doing this in CSS is hilariously difficult and cross-browser support is so-so. Let alone that it is impossible to remember how to do it right.
I don't understand the question. Why do you need to use absolute positioning at all? Does the container have a set height, regardless of the content it contains?

i
isherwood

Likely not.

Assign position:relative to #container, and then position:absolute; bottom:0; to #copyright.

#container { position: relative; } #copyright { position: absolute; bottom: 0; }


If position:relative on your container breaks your design, remember that you can just include a wrapper div inside of the container with 100% height, and add position:relative to that instead.
and if it is for repeating elements, which would otherwise be positioned on top of eachother?
That's not even close. It positions at the bottom of the visible screen on most recent browsers but I don't know of a single one where that will position at the bottom of the container div.
An absolutely positioned element seeks it's closest parent that is absolute or relatively position in order to determine it's position. If all fails it resorts to body (window). So hence the need for the parent to be relative.
add a margin-bottom to #container to prevent the copyright over the page content
C
Community

Actually, the accepted answer by @User will only work if the window is tall and the content is short. But if the content is tall and the window is short, it will put the copyright info over the page content, and then scrolling down to see the content will leave you with a floating copyright notice. That makes this solution useless for most pages (like this page, actually).

The most common way of doing this is the "CSS sticky footer" approach demonstrated, or a slightly slimmer variation. This approach works great -- IF you have a fixed height footer.

If you need a variable height footer that will appear at the bottom of the window if the content is too short, and at the bottom of the content if the window is too short, what do you do?

Swallow your pride and use a table.

For example:

* { padding: 0; margin: 0; } html, body { height: 100%; } #container { height: 100%; border-collapse: collapse; }

Lorem ipsum, etc.

Try it out. This will work for any window size, for any amount of content, for any size footer, on every browser... even IE6.

If you're cringing at the thought of using a table for layout, take a second to ask yourself why. CSS was supposed to make our lives easier -- and it has, overall -- but the fact is that even after all these years, it's still a broken, counter-intuitive mess. It can't solve every problem. It's incomplete.

Tables aren't cool, but at least for now, they are sometimes the best way to solve a design problem.


Seems like the best answer to me. In addition, you can always use "css tables" (display: table[-row/-cell]) instead of html tables. That provides the same layout without the semantics.
If you have a PHP script/other script that generates your page, you can duplicate your footer, using one as a hidden "spacer" and one positioned absolutely. The spacer footer ensures that no matter how much content you have in your footer, it will not go up the page.
For others reading these comments: this has nothing to do with "pride" or being "cool". Using tables for layout is pragmatically even more painful especially for large amounts of content. Making sure you don't miss a td and sifting through so much irrelevant markup when adding content is hell. It's a pain cause we are creating HTML documents not just layouts, and if most of the content of our document isn't tabular data, then why are we putting it in tables? If we don't like using web technologies the way they were meant, then why use them? Use desktop/mobile apps to publish content instead
Pride is irrelevant. Tables shouldn't be used for layout, due to accessibility reasons. If you've ever used a screen reader, you'll know why tables should be used for tabular data only. Use css tables as @chiccodoro states.
It is not web best practices to use tables for layout. HTML is for semantic definitions, not for style. Tables are for tabular data. Layout and style is best left to CSS.
T
TylerH

The flexbox approach!

In supported browsers, you can use the following:

Example Here

.parent {
  display: flex;
  flex-direction: column;
}
.child {
  margin-top: auto;
}

.parent { height: 100px; border: 5px solid #000; display: flex; flex-direction: column; } .child { height: 40px; width: 100%; background: #f00; margin-top: auto; }

Align to the bottom

The solution above is probably more flexible, however, here is an alternative solution:

Example Here

.parent {
  display: flex;
}
.child {
  align-self: flex-end;
}

.parent { height: 100px; border: 5px solid #000; display: flex; } .child { height: 40px; width: 100%; background: #f00; align-self: flex-end; }

Align to the bottom

As a side note, you may want to add vendor prefixes for additional support.


how about column-reverse on parent, so you don't need to add anything to the child at all?
Is there a way to overlay the child container? In case you wanna display a search results box which should not change the layout of the page during search process.
H
Hashbrown

Yes you can do this without absolute positioning and without using tables (which screw with markup and such).

DEMO
This is tested to work on IE>7, chrome, FF & is a really easy thing to add to your existing layout.

<div id="container">
    Some content you don't want affected by the "bottom floating" div
    <div>supports not just text</div>

    <div class="foot">
        Some other content you want kept to the bottom
        <div>this is in a div</div>
    </div>
</div>
#container {
    height:100%;
    border-collapse:collapse;
    display : table;
}

.foot {
    display : table-row;
    vertical-align : bottom;
    height : 1px;
}

It effectively does what float:bottom would, even accounting for the issue pointed out in @Rick Reilly's answer!


Nice! Just a note, IIRC you need the <!DOCTYPE> set in order for this to work on IE (<= 8 at least); those older versions only support display:table-XXX in "standards" mode. But standards mode will also break a lot of pages that were designed for, say, IE6.
You can also use flexbox - stackoverflow.com/questions/526035/…
I found more luck with .foot{display: table-footer-group}. I didn't need vertical-align, height, or border-collapse.
Would this work if #container only contained #foot and no other content?
it seems it would at least need a non-breaking space, @Solace
T
TylerH

Pure CSS, without absolute positioning, without fixing any height, cross-browser (IE9+)

check out that Working Fiddle

Because normal flow is 'top-to-bottom' we can't simply ask the #copyright div to stick to the bottom of his parent without absolutely positioning of some sort, But if we wanted the #copyright div to stick to the top of his parent, it will be very simple - because this is the normal flow way.

So we will use this in our advantage. we will change the order of the divs in the HTML, now the #copyright div is at the top, and the content follow it right away. we also make the content div stretch all the way (using pseudo elements and clearing techniques)

now it's just a matter of inverting that order back in the view. that can be easily done with CSS transform.

We rotate the container by 180deg, and now: up-is-down. (and we inverse back the content to look normal again)

If we want to have a scroolbar within the content area, we need to apply a little bit more of CSS magic. as can be showed Here [in that example, the content is below a header - but its the same idea]

* { margin: 0; padding: 0; } html, body, #Container { height: 100%; color: white; } #Container:before { content: ''; height: 100%; float: left; } #Copyright { background-color: green; } #Stretch { background-color: blue; } #Stretch:after { content: ''; display: block; clear: both; } #Container, #Container>div { -moz-transform: rotateX(180deg); -ms-transform: rotateX(180deg); -o-transform: rotate(180deg); -webkit-transform: rotateX(180deg); transform: rotateX(180deg); }

Element 1
Element 2


Please no, look how awful the rendering is now i.stack.imgur.com/ZP9Hw.png
m
m4n0

CSS Grid

Since the usage of CSS Grid is increasing, I would like to suggest align-self to the element that is inside a grid container.

align-self can contain any of the values: end, self-end, flex-end for the following example.

#parent { display: grid; } #child1 { align-self: end; } /* Extra Styling for Snippet */ #parent { height: 150px; background: #5548B0; color: #fff; padding: 10px; font-family: sans-serif; } #child1 { height: 50px; width: 50px; background: #6A67CE; text-align: center; vertical-align: middle; line-height: 50px; }

1


a
atiquratik

Create another container div for the elements above #copyright. Just above copyright add a new div: <div style="clear:both;"></div> It will force the footer to be under everything else, just like in the case of using relative positioning (bottom:0px;).


T
TylerH

Try this;

<div id="container">
  <div style="height: 100%; border:1px solid #ff0000;">
  <!-- Other elements here -->
  </div>
</div>
<div id="copyright" style="position:relative;border:1px solid #00ff00;top:-25px">
   Copyright Foo web designs
</div>


@Feelsbadman Please do not change other peoples' code in answers like that. If you were intending to just separate out the CSS from the HTML, please note that you inadvertently changed the code to something else, possibly invaliding the answer and certainly changing the poster's intent.
S
Skippy le Grand Gourou

While none of the answers provided here seemed to apply or work in my particular case, I came across this article which provides this neat solution :

#container {
  display: table;
}

#copyright {
  display: table-footer-group;
}

I find it very useful for applying responsive design for mobile display without having to reorder all the html code of a website, setting body itself as a table.

Note that only the first table-footer-group or table-header-group will be rendered as such : if there are more than one, the others will be rendered as table-row-group.


a
atiquratik

You can indeed align the box to the bottom without using position:absolute if you know the height of the #container using the text alignment feature of inline-block elements.

Here you can see it in action.

This is the code:

#container {
    /* So the #container most have a fixed height */
    height: 300px;
    line-height: 300px;
    background:Red;
}

#container > * {
    /* Restore Line height to Normal */
    line-height: 1.2em;
}

#copyright {
    display:inline-block;
    vertical-align:bottom;
    width:100%; /* Let it be a block */
    background:green;
}

S
Samuell

Using the translateY and top property

Just set element child to position: relative and than move it top: 100% (that's the 100% height of the parent) and stick to bottom of parent by transform: translateY(-100%) (that's -100% of the height of the child).

BenefitS

you do not take the element from the page flow

it is dynamic

But still just workaround :(

.copyright{
   position: relative;
   top: 100%;
   transform: translateY(-100%);
}

Don't forget prefixes for the older browser.


T
TylerH

CodePen link here.

html, body { width: 100%; height: 100%; } .overlay { min-height: 100%; position: relative; } .container { width: 900px; position: relative; padding-bottom: 50px; } .height { width: 900px; height: 50px; } .footer { width: 900px; height: 50px; position: absolute; bottom: 0; }

content


J
Jack Sleight

If you want it to "stick" to the bottom, regardless of the height of container, then absolute positioning is the way to go. Of course, if the copyright element is the last in the container it'll always be at the bottom anyway.

Can you expand on your question? Explain exactly what you're trying to do (and why you don't want to use absolute positioning)?


T
TylerH

If you do not know the height of child block:

#parent { background:green; width:200px; height:200px; display:table-cell; vertical-align:bottom; } .child { background:red; vertical-align:bottom; }

child

http://jsbin.com/ULUXIFon/3/edit

If you know the height of the child block add the child block then add padding-top/margin-top:

#parent { background:green; width:200px; height:130px; padding-top:70px; } .child { background:red; vertical-align: bottom; height:130px; }

child


a
atiquratik

Also, if there's stipulations with using position:absolute; or position:relative;, you can always try padding parent div or putting a margin-top:x;. Not a very good method in most cases, but it may come in handy in some cases.


m
m4n0

#container{width:100%; float:left; position:relative;} #copyright{position:absolute; bottom:0px; left:0px; background:#F00; width:100%;} #container{background:gray; height:100px;}


n
nilesh pawar

Don't wanna use "position:absolute" for sticky footer at bottom. Then you can do this way:

html, body { height: 100%; margin: 0; } .wrapper { min-height: 100%; /* Equal to height of footer */ /* But also accounting for potential margin-bottom of last child */ margin-bottom: -50px; } .footer{ background: #000; text-align: center; color: #fff; } .footer, .push { height: 50px; }

content
test


Hi nilesh; this solution is provided in multiple answers already. Please be sure to read all existing answers to a question before providing a new one, to ensure there's no duplication of content!
Z
Zyox

Here is an approach targeted at making an element with a known height and width (at least approximately) float to the right and stay at the bottom, while behaving as an inline element to the other elements. It is focused at the bottom-right because you can place it easily in any other corner through other methods.

I needed to make a navigation bar which would have the actual links at the bottom right, and random sibling elements, while ensuring that the bar itself stretched properly, without disrupting the layout. I used a "shadow" element to occupy the navigation bar's links' space and added it at the end of the container's child nodes.

<!DOCTYPE html>
<div id="container">
  <!-- Other elements here -->
  <div id="copyright">
    Copyright Foo web designs
  </div>
  <span id="copyright-s">filler</span>
</div>

<style>
  #copyright {
    display:inline-block;
    position:absolute;
    bottom:0;
    right:0;
  }
  #copyright-s {
    float:right;
    visibility:hidden;
    width:20em; /* ~ #copyright.style.width */
    height:3em; /* ~ #copyright.style.height */
  }
</style>

D
DesignConsult

Maybe this helps someone: You can always place the div outside the other div and then push it upwards using negative margin:

<div id="container" style="background-color: #ccc; padding-bottom: 30px;">
  Hello!
</div>
<div id="copyright" style="margin-top: -20px;">
  Copyright Foo web designs
</div>

j
j.xavier.atero

Solution for this specific scenario:

Place inner at the bottom of parent . The height of the parent is set by the height of its "tallest" sibling

The set up:

I have a row with multiple

These

are next to each other inside another

Each

has 3 inner divs on top of each other:
,
,