ChatGPT解决这个技术问题 Extra ChatGPT

endsWith in JavaScript

How can I check if a string ends with a particular character in JavaScript?

Example: I have a string

var str = "mystring#";

I want to know if that string is ending with #. How can I check it?

Is there a endsWith() method in JavaScript? One solution I have is take the length of the string and get the last character and check it.

Is this the best way or there is any other way?


E
EscapeNetscape

UPDATE (Nov 24th, 2015):

This answer is originally posted in the year 2010 (SIX years back.) so please take note of these insightful comments:

Shauna -

Update for Googlers - Looks like ECMA6 adds this function. The MDN article also shows a polyfill. https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/JavaScript/Reference/Global_Objects/String/endsWith

T.J. Crowder -

Creating substrings isn't expensive on modern browsers; it may well have been in 2010 when this answer was posted. These days, the simple this.substr(-suffix.length) === suffix approach is fastest on Chrome, the same on IE11 as indexOf, and only 4% slower (fergetaboutit territory) on Firefox: https://jsben.ch/OJzlM And faster across the board when the result is false: jsperf.com/endswith-stackoverflow-when-false Of course, with ES6 adding endsWith, the point is moot. :-)

ORIGINAL ANSWER:

I know this is a year old question... but I need this too and I need it to work cross-browser so... combining everyone's answer and comments and simplifying it a bit:

String.prototype.endsWith = function(suffix) {
    return this.indexOf(suffix, this.length - suffix.length) !== -1;
};

Doesn't create a substring

Uses native indexOf function for fastest results

Skip unnecessary comparisons using the second parameter of indexOf to skip ahead

Works in Internet Explorer

NO Regex complications

Also, if you don't like stuffing things in native data structure's prototypes, here's a standalone version:

function endsWith(str, suffix) {
    return str.indexOf(suffix, str.length - suffix.length) !== -1;
}

EDIT: As noted by @hamish in the comments, if you want to err on the safe side and check if an implementation has already been provided, you can just adds a typeof check like so:

if (typeof String.prototype.endsWith !== 'function') {
    String.prototype.endsWith = function(suffix) {
        return this.indexOf(suffix, this.length - suffix.length) !== -1;
    };
}

Update for Googlers - Looks like ECMA6 adds this function. The MDN article also shows a polyfill. developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/JavaScript/Reference/…
@lukas.pukenis it skips to the end and only check one instance of the suffix at the very end. it doesn't matter if the search string appears elsewhere.
Adding a check for the situation when the argument "suffix" is not defined": if (typeof String.prototype.endsWith !== 'function') { String.prototype.endsWith = function(suffix) { return this.indexOf(suffix, this.length - ((suffix && suffix.length) || 0)) !== -1; }; }
What are the regex complications you referred to?
Creating substrings isn't expensive on modern browsers; it may well have been in 2010 when this answer was posted. These days, the simple this.substr(-suffix.length) === suffix approach is fastest on Chrome, the same on IE11 as indexOf, and only 4% slower (fergetaboutit territory) on Firefox: jsperf.com/endswith-stackoverflow/14 And faster across the board when the result is false: jsperf.com/endswith-stackoverflow-when-false Of course, with ES6 adding endsWith, the point is moot. :-)
M
Mike Samuel
/#$/.test(str)

will work on all browsers, doesn't require monkey patching String, and doesn't require scanning the entire string as lastIndexOf does when there is no match.

If you want to match a constant string that might contain regular expression special characters, such as '$', then you can use the following:

function makeSuffixRegExp(suffix, caseInsensitive) {
  return new RegExp(
      String(suffix).replace(/[$%()*+.?\[\\\]{|}]/g, "\\$&") + "$",
      caseInsensitive ? "i" : "");
}

and then you can use it like this

makeSuffixRegExp("a[complicated]*suffix*").test(str)

This is nice and simple if you're checking for a constant substring.
lastIndexOf scans all the string? I thought it would search from the end to the beggining.
@TomBrito, lastIndexOf scans the entire string only if it finds no match, or finds a match at the beginning. If there is a match at the end then it does work proportional to the length of the suffix. Yes, /asdf$/.test(str) yields true when str ends with "asdf".
@Tom Brito, It's a regular expression literal. The syntax is borrowed from Perl. See developer.mozilla.org/en/Core_JavaScript_1.5_Guide/… or for an unnecessary level of detail, see section 7.8.5 of the EcmaScript language specification.
+1 for the cross-browser compatibility. Tested on Chrome 28.0.1500.72 m, Firefox 22.0, and IE9.
P
Phillip B Oldham

Unfortunately not. if( "mystring#".substr(-1) === "#" ) {}


@Anthony, um... so use .Length-1, what's the problem? if (mystring.substr(mystring.length-1) === "#") {} works just fine in IE.
@BrainSlugs83 - that's exactly the problem: the '.length-1' syntax works in IE, and the '-1' syntax doesn't. It's something to bear in mind, so +1 to Anthony for the tip.
Couldn't you use slice()? It works for me in my quick IE7 test.
freaken IE. when will it die?
@ahnbizcad Your prayers have been answered now. RIP IE
M
Michał Perłakowski

Come on, this is the correct endsWith implementation:

String.prototype.endsWith = function (s) {
  return this.length >= s.length && this.substr(this.length - s.length) == s;
}

using lastIndexOf just creates unnecessary CPU loops if there is no match.


Agreed. I really feel like this is the most performant solution offered as it has early aborts/sanity checking, it's short and concise, it's elegant (overloading the string prototype) and substring seems like much less of a resource hit than spinning up the regex engine.
Also like this solution. Just the function name is mispelled. Should be "endsWith".
@BrainSlugs83 It's been a couple of years, but now this method is no faster than the 'indexOf' method mentioned above by chakrit, and under Safari, it is 30% slower! Here is a jsPerf test for the failure case over about a 50-character string: jsperf.com/endswithcomparison
Probably should use === though.
J
Jon Skeet

This version avoids creating a substring, and doesn't use regular expressions (some regex answers here will work; others are broken):

String.prototype.endsWith = function(str)
{
    var lastIndex = this.lastIndexOf(str);
    return (lastIndex !== -1) && (lastIndex + str.length === this.length);
}

If performance is important to you, it would be worth testing whether lastIndexOf is actually faster than creating a substring or not. (It may well depend on the JS engine you're using...) It may well be faster in the matching case, and when the string is small - but when the string is huge it needs to look back through the whole thing even though we don't really care :(

For checking a single character, finding the length and then using charAt is probably the best way.


If this.lastIndexOf() returns -1, you can hit cases where it returns true dependong on this.length and str.length. Add a test that lastIndexOf() != -1.
Why is the regex method broken?
@izb: The answers which are older than mine which try to use str+"$" as a regex are broken, as they may not be valid regexes.
N
Nikita Koksharov

Didn't see apporach with slice method. So i'm just leave it here:

function endsWith(str, suffix) {
    return str.slice(-suffix.length) === suffix
}

You can simplify it a bit more: return str.slice(-1) === suffix;
This is the best answer. Not sure why it doesn't have more upvotes.
A
Aniket Kulkarni

From developer.mozilla.org String.prototype.endsWith()

Summary

The endsWith() method determines whether a string ends with the characters of another string, returning true or false as appropriate.

Syntax

str.endsWith(searchString [, position]);

Parameters

searchString : The characters to be searched for at the end of this string.

position : Search within this string as if this string were only this long; defaults to this string's actual length, clamped within the range established by this string's length.

Description

This method lets you determine whether or not a string ends with another string.

Examples

var str = "To be, or not to be, that is the question.";

alert( str.endsWith("question.") );  // true
alert( str.endsWith("to be") );      // false
alert( str.endsWith("to be", 19) );  // true

Specifications

ECMAScript Language Specification 6th Edition (ECMA-262)

Browser compatibility

https://i.stack.imgur.com/THZsd.jpg


u
user73745
return this.lastIndexOf(str) + str.length == this.length;

does not work in the case where original string length is one less than search string length and the search string is not found:

lastIndexOf returns -1, then you add search string length and you are left with the original string's length.

A possible fix is

return this.length >= str.length && this.lastIndexOf(str) + str.length == this.length

You have earned the “Found a mistake in a Jon Skeet answer” badge. See your profile for details.
d
duckyflip
if( ("mystring#").substr(-1,1) == '#' )

-- Or --

if( ("mystring#").match(/#$/) )

V
Vinicius

Just another quick alternative that worked like a charm for me, using regex:

// Would be equivalent to:
// "Hello World!".endsWith("World!")
"Hello World!".match("World!$") != null

M
Mohammed Rafeeq
String.prototype.endsWith = function(str) 
{return (this.match(str+"$")==str)}

String.prototype.startsWith = function(str) 
{return (this.match("^"+str)==str)}

I hope this helps

var myStr = “  Earth is a beautiful planet  ”;
var myStr2 = myStr.trim();  
//==“Earth is a beautiful planet”;

if (myStr2.startsWith(“Earth”)) // returns TRUE

if (myStr2.endsWith(“planet”)) // returns TRUE

if (myStr.startsWith(“Earth”)) 
// returns FALSE due to the leading spaces…

if (myStr.endsWith(“planet”)) 
// returns FALSE due to trailing spaces…

the traditional way

function strStartsWith(str, prefix) {
    return str.indexOf(prefix) === 0;
}

function strEndsWith(str, suffix) {
    return str.match(suffix+"$")==suffix;
}

You have to escape your string for regex escape sequences
Regular expressions are slow even in fast languages. Just check the end of a string.
T
Tici

I don't know about you, but:

var s = "mystring#";
s.length >= 1 && s[s.length - 1] == '#'; // will do the thing!

Why regular expressions? Why messing with the prototype? substr? c'mon...


'cus sometimes it's better when it's W.E.T.
D
Dheeraj Vepakomma

If you're using lodash:

_.endsWith('abc', 'c'); // true

If not using lodash, you can borrow from its source.


A
Ashley Davis

I just learned about this string library:

http://stringjs.com/

Include the js file and then use the S variable like this:

S('hi there').endsWith('hi there')

It can also be used in NodeJS by installing it:

npm install string

Then requiring it as the S variable:

var S = require('string');

The web page also has links to alternate string libraries, if this one doesn't take your fancy.


v
vlad_tepesch
function strEndsWith(str,suffix) {
  var reguex= new RegExp(suffix+'$');

  if (str.match(reguex)!=null)
      return true;

  return false;
}

It's better if you explain why your code solves the problem. See the guide How to Answer.
the suffix argument should be scanned for regex expressions that have to be escaped. using indexOf or lastIndexOf seems to be a better option.
It won't work if the suffix contains any of these chars: .*+?^=!:${}()[]/\
L
LahiruBandara

So many things for such a small problem, just use this Regular Expression

var str = "mystring#"; var regex = /^.*#$/ if (regex.test(str)){ //if it has a trailing '#' }


S
ScrapCode

Its been many years for this question. Let me add an important update for the users who wants to use the most voted chakrit's answer.

'endsWith' functions is already added to JavaScript as part of ECMAScript 6 (experimental technology)

Refer it here: https://developer.mozilla.org/en/docs/Web/JavaScript/Reference/Global_Objects/String/endsWith

Hence it is highly recommended to add check for the existence of native implementation as mentioned in the answer.


m
manish
function check(str)
{
    var lastIndex = str.lastIndexOf('/');
    return (lastIndex != -1) && (lastIndex  == (str.length - 1));
}

D
Dan Doyon

A way to future proof and/or prevent overwriting of existing prototype would be test check to see if it has already been added to the String prototype. Here's my take on the non-regex highly rated version.

if (typeof String.endsWith !== 'function') {
    String.prototype.endsWith = function (suffix) {
        return this.indexOf(suffix, this.length - suffix.length) !== -1;
    };
}

Using if (!String.prototype.hasOwnProperty("endsWith")) is the best way. With typeof, "MooTools and some of the other AJAX libraries will screw you up", according to "Crockford on JavaScript - Level 7: ECMAScript 5: The New Parts", at 15:50 min.
r
rmehlinger

@chakrit's accepted answer is a solid way to do it yourself. If, however, you're looking for a packaged solution, I recommend taking a look at underscore.string, as @mlunoe pointed out. Using underscore.string, the code would be:

function endsWithHash(str) {
  return _.str.endsWith(str, '#');
}

i
immazharkhan

After all those long tally of answers, i found this piece of code simple and easy to understand!

function end(str, target) {
  return str.substr(-target.length) == target;
}

u
user511941

if you dont want to use lasIndexOf or substr then why not just look at the string in its natural state (ie. an array)

String.prototype.endsWith = function(suffix) {
    if (this[this.length - 1] == suffix) return true;
    return false;
}

or as a standalone function

function strEndsWith(str,suffix) {
    if (str[str.length - 1] == suffix) return true;
    return false;
}

E
Ebubekir Dirican
String.prototype.endWith = function (a) {
    var isExp = a.constructor.name === "RegExp",
    val = this;
    if (isExp === false) {
        a = escape(a);
        val = escape(val);
    } else
        a = a.toString().replace(/(^\/)|(\/$)/g, "");
    return eval("/" + a + "$/.test(val)");
}

// example
var str = "Hello";
alert(str.endWith("lo"));
alert(str.endWith(/l(o|a)/));

M
Matthew Brown

This builds on @charkit's accepted answer allowing either an Array of strings, or string to passed in as an argument.

if (typeof String.prototype.endsWith === 'undefined') {
    String.prototype.endsWith = function(suffix) {
        if (typeof suffix === 'String') {
            return this.indexOf(suffix, this.length - suffix.length) !== -1;
        }else if(suffix instanceof Array){
            return _.find(suffix, function(value){
                console.log(value, (this.indexOf(value, this.length - value.length) !== -1));
                return this.indexOf(value, this.length - value.length) !== -1;
            }, this);
        }
    };
}

This requires underscorejs - but can probably be adjusted to remove the underscore dependency.


This is a bad solution, rather if you are already using underscore you should add this epeli.github.io/underscore.string to your dependencies and use their implementation: _.str.endsWith
t
termi
if(typeof String.prototype.endsWith !== "function") {
    /**
     * String.prototype.endsWith
     * Check if given string locate at the end of current string
     * @param {string} substring substring to locate in the current string.
     * @param {number=} position end the endsWith check at that position
     * @return {boolean}
     *
     * @edition ECMA-262 6th Edition, 15.5.4.23
     */
    String.prototype.endsWith = function(substring, position) {
        substring = String(substring);

        var subLen = substring.length | 0;

        if( !subLen )return true;//Empty string

        var strLen = this.length;

        if( position === void 0 )position = strLen;
        else position = position | 0;

        if( position < 1 )return false;

        var fromIndex = (strLen < position ? strLen : position) - subLen;

        return (fromIndex >= 0 || subLen === -fromIndex)
            && (
                position === 0
                // if position not at the and of the string, we can optimise search substring
                //  by checking first symbol of substring exists in search position in current string
                || this.charCodeAt(fromIndex) === substring.charCodeAt(0)//fast false
            )
            && this.indexOf(substring, fromIndex) === fromIndex
        ;
    };
}

Benefits:

This version is not just re-using indexOf.

Greatest performance on long strings. Here is a speed test http://jsperf.com/starts-ends-with/4

Fully compatible with ecmascript specification. It passes the tests


D
Daniel Nuriyev

Do not use regular expressions. They are slow even in fast languages. Just write a function that checks the end of a string. This library has nice examples: groundjs/util.js. Be careful adding a function to String.prototype. This code has nice examples of how to do it: groundjs/prototype.js In general, this is a nice language-level library: groundjs You can also take a look at lodash


A
Aniket Kulkarni

all of them are very useful examples. Adding String.prototype.endsWith = function(str) will help us to simply call the method to check if our string ends with it or not, well regexp will also do it.

I found a better solution than mine. Thanks every one.


Q
Quanlong

For coffeescript

String::endsWith = (suffix) ->
  -1 != @indexOf suffix, @length - suffix.length

A
Arsen Khachaturyan

This is the implementation of endsWith:

String.prototype.endsWith = function (str) {
  return (this.length >= str.length) && (this.substr(this.length - str.length) === str);
}

A
Allan Pereira

7 years old post, but I was not able to understand top few posts, because they are complex. So, I wrote my own solution:

function strEndsWith(str, endwith)
{
    var lastIndex = url.lastIndexOf(endsWith);
    var result = false;
    if (lastIndex > 0 && (lastIndex + "registerc".length) == url.length)
    {
        result = true;
    }
    return result;
}