ChatGPT解决这个技术问题 Extra ChatGPT

How to express a NOT IN query with ActiveRecord/Rails?

I'm hoping there is a easy solution that doesn't involve find_by_sql, if not then I guess that will have to work.

I found this article which references this:

Topic.find(:all, :conditions => { :forum_id => @forums.map(&:id) })

which is the same as

SELECT * FROM topics WHERE forum_id IN (<@forum ids>)

I am wondering if there is a way to do NOT IN with that, like:

SELECT * FROM topics WHERE forum_id NOT IN (<@forum ids>)
As an FYI, Datamapper has had specific support for NOT IN. Example: Person.all(:name.not => ['bob','rick','steve'])
sorry for being ignorant, but what is Datamapper? is that part of rails 3?
data mapper is an alternative way of storing data, it replaces Active Record with a different structure and then you write your model related stuff such as queries, differently.

n
notapatch

Rails 4+:

Article.where.not(title: ['Rails 3', 'Rails 5']) 

Rails 3:

Topic.where('id NOT IN (?)', Array.wrap(actions))

Where actions is an array with: [1,2,3,4,5]


This is the proper approach with the latest Active Record query model
@NewAlexandria is right, so you'd have to do something like Topic.where('id NOT IN (?)', (actions.empty? ? '', actions). It would still break on nil, but I find that the array you pass in is usually generated by a filter that will return [] at the very least and never nil. I recommend checking out Squeel, a DSL on top of Active Record. Then you could do: Topic.where{id.not_in actions}, nil/empty/or otherwise.
@danneu just swap .empty? for .blank? and you are nil-proof
go for the rails 4 notation: Article.where.not(title: ['Rails 3', 'Rails 5'])
Like @NewAlexandria said, this does not work when the variable is [] or nil. You end up with id NOT in (null). To get around that use presence, like so: Topic.where( 'id NOT IN (?)', actions.presence || "" )
T
Trung Lê

FYI, In Rails 4, you can use not syntax:

Article.where.not(title: ['Rails 3', 'Rails 5'])

finally! what took them so long to include that? :)
P
Pedro Rolo

Using Arel:

topics=Topic.arel_table
Topic.where(topics[:forum_id].not_in(@forum_ids))

or, if preferred:

topics=Topic.arel_table
Topic.where(topics[:forum_id].in(@forum_ids).not)

and since rails 4 on:

topics=Topic.arel_table
Topic.where.not(topics[:forum_id].in(@forum_ids))

Please notice that eventually you do not want the forum_ids to be the ids list, but rather a subquery, if so then you should do something like this before getting the topics:

@forum_ids = Forum.where(/*whatever conditions are desirable*/).select(:id)

in this way you get everything in a single query: something like:

select * from topic 
where forum_id in (select id 
                   from forum 
                   where /*whatever conditions are desirable*/)

Also notice that eventually you do not want to do this, but rather a join - what might be more efficient.


A join might be more efficient, but not necessarily. Make sure to use EXPLAIN!
A
Andrew Marshall

You can try something like:

Topic.find(:all, :conditions => ['forum_id not in (?)', @forums.map(&:id)])

You might need to do @forums.map(&:id).join(','). I can't remember if Rails will the argument into a CSV list if it is enumerable.

You could also do this:

# in topic.rb
named_scope :not_in_forums, lambda { |forums| { :conditions => ['forum_id not in (?)', forums.select(&:id).join(',')] }

# in your controller 
Topic.not_in_forums(@forums)

V
Vincent Cadoret

To expand on @Trung Lê answer, in Rails 4 you can do the following:

Topic.where.not(forum_id:@forums.map(&:id))

And you could take it a step further. If you need to first filter for only published Topics and then filter out the ids you don't want, you could do this:

Topic.where(published:true).where.not(forum_id:@forums.map(&:id))

Rails 4 makes it so much easier!


A
Andrew Marshall

The accepted solution fails if @forums is empty. To workaround this I had to do

Topic.find(:all, :conditions => ['forum_id not in (?)', (@forums.empty? ? '' : @forums.map(&:id))])

Or, if using Rails 3+:

Topic.where( 'forum_id not in (?)', (@forums.empty? ? '' : @forums.map(&:id)) ).all

A
Andrew Marshall

Most of the answers above should suffice you but if you are doing a lot more of such predicate and complex combinations check out Squeel. You will be able to doing something like:

Topic.where{{forum_id.not_in => @forums.map(&:id)}}
Topic.where{forum_id.not_in @forums.map(&:id)} 
Topic.where{forum_id << @forums.map(&:id)}

A
Andrew Marshall

You may want to have a look at the meta_where plugin by Ernie Miller. Your SQL statement:

SELECT * FROM topics WHERE forum_id NOT IN (<@forum ids>)

...could be expressed like this:

Topic.where(:forum_id.nin => @forum_ids)

Ryan Bates of Railscasts created a nice screencast explaining MetaWhere.

Not sure if this is what you're looking for but to my eyes it certainly looks better than an embedded SQL query.


A
Andy Triggs

The original post specifically mentions using numeric IDs, but I came here looking for the syntax for doing a NOT IN with an array of strings.

ActiveRecord will handle that nicely for you too:

Thing.where(['state NOT IN (?)', %w{state1 state2}])

O
Omar Qureshi

Can these forum ids be worked out in a pragmatic way? e.g. can you find these forums somehow - if that is the case you should do something like

Topic.all(:joins => "left join forums on (forums.id = topics.forum_id and some_condition)", :conditions => "forums.id is null")

Which would be more efficient than doing an SQL not in


e
evanrmurphy

This way optimizes for readability, but it's not as efficient in terms of database queries:

# Retrieve all topics, then use array subtraction to
# find the ones not in our list
Topic.all - @forums.map(&:id)

t
tjeden

You can use sql in your conditions:

Topic.find(:all, :conditions => [ "forum_id NOT IN (?)", @forums.map(&:id)])

C
Chuck Callebs

Piggybacking off of jonnii:

Topic.find(:all, :conditions => ['forum_id not in (?)', @forums.pluck(:id)])

using pluck rather than mapping over the elements

found via railsconf 2012 10 things you did not know rails could do


C
CRABOLO

When you query a blank array add "<< 0" to the array in the where block so it doesn't return "NULL" and break the query.

Topic.where('id not in (?)',actions << 0)

If actions could be an empty or blank array.


Warning: this actually adds a 0 to the array, so it's no longer empty. It also has the side-effect of modifying the array -- double danger if you use it later. Much better to wrap it in an if-else and use Topic.none/all for the edge cases
A safer way is: Topic.where("id NOT IN (?)", actions.presence || [0])
d
dukha

Here is a more complex "not in" query, using a subquery in rails 4 using squeel. Of course very slow compared to the equivalent sql, but hey, it works.

    scope :translations_not_in_english, ->(calmapp_version_id, language_iso_code){
      join_to_cavs_tls_arr(calmapp_version_id).
      joins_to_tl_arr.
      where{ tl1.iso_code == 'en' }.
      where{ cavtl1.calmapp_version_id == my{calmapp_version_id}}.
      where{ dot_key_code << (Translation.
        join_to_cavs_tls_arr(calmapp_version_id).
        joins_to_tl_arr.    
        where{ tl1.iso_code == my{language_iso_code} }.
        select{ "dot_key_code" }.all)}
    }

The first 2 methods in the scope are other scopes which declare the aliases cavtl1 and tl1. << is the not in operator in squeel.

Hope this helps someone.


L
LEONARDO PEREIRA RODRIGUES

If someone want to use two or more conditions, you can do that:

your_array = [1,2,3,4]
your_string = "SOMETHING"

YourModel.where('variable1 NOT IN (?) AND variable2=(?)',Array.wrap(your_array),your_string)