ChatGPT解决这个技术问题 Extra ChatGPT

Default behavior of "git push" without a branch specified

I use the following command to push to my remote branch:

git push origin sandbox

If I say

git push origin

does that push changes in my other branches too, or does it only update my current branch? I have three branches: master, production and sandbox.

The git push documentation is not very clear about this, so I'd like to clarify this for good.

Which branches and remotes do the following git push commands update exactly?

git push 
git push origin

origin above is a remote.

I understand that git push [remote] [branch] will push only that branch to the remote.

Regarding the configuration of diff tools in general, and the new script git difftool, I have added a new answer in this other SO question: stackoverflow.com/questions/255202/…
I did a blog post about the surprising behaviour of git push, which might be of interest
@Mark: in other work, pushing only the current branch to its tracked upstream. Nice.
help.github.com/articles/pushing-to-a-remote putting this link here for immediate help to novices like me

1
17 revs, 13 users 30%

You can control the default behavior by setting push.default in your git config. From the git-config(1) documentation:

push.default

Defines the action git push should take if no refspec is given on the command line, no refspec is configured in the remote, and no refspec is implied by any of the options given on the command line. Possible values are:

nothing: do not push anything

matching: (default before Git 2.0) push all matching branches All branches having the same name in both ends are considered to be matching.

upstream: push the current branch to its upstream branch (tracking is a deprecated synonym for upstream)

current: push the current branch to a branch of the same name

simple: (new in Git 1.7.11, default since Git 2.0) like upstream, but refuses to push if the upstream branch's name is different from the local one This is the safest option and is well-suited for beginners.

The simple, current and upstream modes are for those who want to push out a single branch after finishing work, even when the other branches are not yet ready to be pushed out

Command line examples:

To view the current configuration:

git config push.default

To set a new configuration:

git config push.default current

It's probably worth noting that this is new in v1.6.3: kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/RelNotes-1.6.3.txt
This "push.default" is the greatest thing ever for working with multiple repos. Set it to "tracking" and you are all good. Combined with branch --set-upstream these making push and pull way more convenient.
"tracking" is the deprecated synonym for "upstream": kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-config.html
It's worth noting that as of Git 1.7.11, there's a new simple mode. This mode is intended to become the default in future. simple works like upstream, but like current requires that the branch names are the same on both ends.
It's worth noting that as of Git 2.0 the simple behaviour is now the default.
C
Christoffer

You can set up default behavior for your git with push.default

git config push.default current

or if you have many repositories and want the same for all then

git config --global push.default current

The current in this setup means that by default you will only push the current branch when you do git push

Other options are:

nothing : Do not push anything

matching : Push all matching branches (default)

tracking : Push the current branch to whatever it is tracking

current : Push the current branch

UPDATE - NEW WAY TO DO THIS

As of Git 1.7.11 do the following:

git config --global push.default simple

This is a new setting introduced that works in the same way as current, and will be made default to git from v 2.0 according to rumors


Yes I read the answer you are referring to, but that answer only tells what to do and not how to do it. So I added my answer so all the info needed to set it up is on the same page.
OK; it's better to suggest an edit to the said post, because nobody will see your answer, as it's not likely to get as many votes
how would one go about pulling to current branch? git pull origin?
d
davr

git push origin will push all changes on the local branches that have matching remote branches at origin As for git push

Works like git push , where is the current branch's remote (or origin, if no remote is configured for the current branch).

From the Examples section of the git-push man page


Yep, that makes it clear. I'm probably running an older version of git (1.6.1.1 Mac OS X) which does not have these examples in the man page.
Probably I'm running 1.6.3.1. I did find it on the site I linked however.
So, in my case, where all the local branches have the same remote "origin", "git push" would be exactly the same as "git push origin" which would push only the local branches that have a corresponding branch in the remote.
@Debajit Right on! Great question by the way. I had always assumed that git push would only push the current branch. Apparently not! Very good to know.
This question is old but for anybody new, @docgnome is right. Just running 'git push origin' will push all of the branches instead of only the current branch. Use 'git push -f -v -n origin development' to force push a branch named development. Use the -n flag to simulate the git push result so you can see in advance which branch(es) will be affected. If it looks good then run 'git push -f -v origin development'. This might be useful stackoverflow.com/questions/3741136/git-push-f-vs
n
neoneye

I just committed my code to a branch and pushed it to github, like this:

git branch SimonLowMemoryExperiments
git checkout SimonLowMemoryExperiments
git add .
git commit -a -m "Lots of experimentation with identifying the memory problems"
git push origin SimonLowMemoryExperiments

You can condense the commit to ` git commit -am"... "`
Does this answer have anything to do with the question?? :?
Looks like everyone just decided to give a random git-related answer
M
Mukesh Chapagain

Here is a very handy and helpful information about Git Push: Git Push: Just the Tip

The most common use of git push is to push your local changes to your public upstream repository. Assuming that the upstream is a remote named "origin" (the default remote name if your repository is a clone) and the branch to be updated to/from is named "master" (the default branch name), this is done with: git push origin master

git push origin will push changes from all local branches to matching branches the origin remote.

git push origin master will push changes from the local master branch to the remote master branch.

git push origin master:staging will push changes from the local master branch to the remote staging branch if it exists.


git push origin branch_name for some reason push not only branch_name branch, but also other my local branches (git version 1.9.1).
git push origin master:staging is an awesome hidden gem!
V
VonC

(March 2012)
Beware: that default "matching" policy might change soon
(sometimes after git1.7.10+)
:

See "Please discuss: what "git push" should do when you do not say what to push?"

In the current setting (i.e. push.default=matching), git push without argument will push all branches that exist locally and remotely with the same name. This is usually appropriate when a developer pushes to his own public repository, but may be confusing if not dangerous when using a shared repository. The proposal is to change the default to 'upstream', i.e. push only the current branch, and push it to the branch git pull would pull from. Another candidate is 'current'; this pushes only the current branch to the remote branch of the same name. What has been discussed so far can be seen in this thread:

http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.version-control.git/192547/focus=192694

Previous relevant discussions include:

http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.version-control.git/123350/focus=123541

http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.version-control.git/166743

To join the discussion, send your messages to: git@vger.kernel.org


M
Mat Schaffer

I just put this in my .gitconfig aliases section and love how it works:

pub = "!f() { git push -u ${1:-origin} `git symbolic-ref HEAD`; }; f"

Will push the current branch to origin with git pub or another repo with git pub repo-name. Tasty.


That is nice, but it unfortunately assumes that the branch has the same name on the other repository. Try git push -u --repo="origin" $1; instead. It works quite well, except if you push to another repository, the branch name will be the name used by the other repository, not the one you are pushing from
Hey thanks! Makes me wanna do a more complete version that checks the tracking status before pushing. But I'll stick with mine for now since I rarely have different branch names between repos.
C
Community

You can push current branch with command

git push origin HEAD

(took from here)


k
kenorb

You can change that default behavior in your .gitconfig, for example:

[push]
  default = current

To check the current settings, run:

git config --global --get push.default

C
Cody Caughlan

A git push will try and push all local branches to the remote server, this is likely what you do not want. I have a couple of conveniences setup to deal with this:

Alias "gpull" and "gpush" appropriately:

In my ~/.bash_profile

get_git_branch() {
  echo `git branch 2> /dev/null | sed -e '/^[^*]/d' -e 's/* \(.*\)/\1/'`
}
alias gpull='git pull origin `get_git_branch`'
alias gpush='git push origin `get_git_branch`'

Thus, executing "gpush" or "gpull" will push just my "currently on" branch.


If you always want the behavior of gpush, you can also set remote.origin.push=HEAD (e.g. "git config remote.origin.push HEAD"), as mentioned in the examples section of the git-push man page.
This is not necessary if you look at the above post by "Brian L".
It is, as there is no equv. for pull pull.default
M
Mark Fisher

Rather than using aliases, I prefer creating git-XXX scripts so I can source control them more easily (our devs all have a certain source controlled dir on their path for this type of thing).

This script (called git-setpush) will set the config value for remote.origin.push value to something that will only push the current branch:

#!/bin/bash -eu

CURRENT_BRANCH=$(git branch | grep '^\*' | cut -d" " -f2)
NEW_PUSH_REF=HEAD:refs/for/$CURRENT_BRANCH

echo "setting remote.origin.push to $NEW_PUSH_REF"
git config remote.origin.push $NEW_PUSH_REF

note, as we're using Gerrit, it sets the target to refs/for/XXX to push into a review branch. It also assumes origin is your remote name.

Invoke it after checking out a branch with

git checkout your-branch
git setpush

It could obviously be adapted to also do the checkout, but I like scripts to do one thing and do it well


great idea setting remote.origin.push for gerrit usage. My local feature branches feature/fix_fubar are all pointed to more generic upstream branches like master or develop, so this would point at the wrong upstream. What's your local flow look like for gerrit controlled repos?
If you only have one "target" branch on gerrit, try simply git config remote.origin.push HEAD:refs/for/master.
M
MichaelMoser

I have added the following functions into my .bashrc file to automate these tasks. It does git push/git pull + name of current branch.

function gpush()
{
  if [[ "x$1" == "x-h" ]]; then
    cat <<EOF
Usage: gpush
git: for current branch: push changes to remote branch;
EOF
  else
    set -x
    local bname=`git rev-parse --abbrev-ref --symbolic-full-name @{u} | sed -e "s#/# #"`
    git push ${bname}
    set +x
  fi
}

function gpull()
{
  if [[ "x$1" == "x-h" ]]; then
    cat <<EOF
Usage: gpull
git: for current branch: pull changes from
EOF
  else
    set -x
    local bname=`git rev-parse --abbrev-ref --symbolic-full-name @{u} | sed -e "s#/# #"`
    git pull ${bname}
    set +x
  fi
}

k
kobi.kadosh

New config in git 2.37.0

Run to set auto setup remote instead of changing the push default behavior

git config --global --add --bool push.autoSetupRemote true

it works well with push.default is to simple, upstream

References: answer tweet docs commit