I have two (private) feature branches that I'm working on.
a -- b -- c <-- Master
\ \
\ d -- e <-- Branch1
\
f -- g <-- Branch2
After working on these branches a little while I've discovered that I need the changes from Branch2 in Branch1. I'd like to rebase the changes in Branch2 onto Branch1. I'd like to end up with the following:
a -- b -- c <-- Master
\
d -- e -- f -- g <-- Branch1
I'm pretty sure I need to rebase the second branch onto the first, but I'm not entirely sure about the correct syntax and which branch I should have checked out.
Will this command produce the desired result?
(Branch1)$ git rebase --onto Branch1 Branch2
git rebase -
. see my answer below
Switch to Branch2 git checkout Branch2 Apply the current (Branch2) changes on top of the Branch1 changes, staying in Branch2: git rebase Branch1
Which would leave you with the desired result in Branch2:
a -- b -- c <-- Master
\
d -- e <-- Branch1
\
d -- e -- f' -- g' <-- Branch2
You can delete Branch1.
Note: if you were on Branch1
, you will with Git 2.0 (Q2 2014) be able to type:
git checkout Branch2
git rebase -
See commit 4f40740 by Brian Gesiak modocache
:
rebase: allow "-" short-hand for the previous branch
Teach rebase the same shorthand as checkout and merge to name the branch to rebase the current branch on; that is, that "-" means "the branch we were previously on".
I know you've already accepted the answer, but if you want to do exactly what you asked for (add Branch2's commits on top of Branch1 while staying on Branch1) you can do this:
git checkout Branch1
git cherry-pick master..Branch2
You'll end up with this.
a -- b -- c <-- Master
\
d -- e -- f' -- g' <-- Branch1 (current)
\
f -- g <-- Branch2
This will cherry-pick each of the commits on Branch2 in order onto Branch1. Then you can delete Branch2.
git cherry-pick mybranch...origin/mybranch
to pick those commits to current branch.
git cherry-pick <current-branch>..<other-branch>
I know you asked to Rebase, but I'd Cherry-Pick the commits I wanted to move from Branch2 to Branch1 instead. That way, I wouldn't need to care about when which branch was created from master, and I'd have more control over the merging.
a -- b -- c <-- Master
\ \
\ d -- e -- f -- g <-- Branch1 (Cherry-Pick f & g)
\
f -- g <-- Branch2
Success story sharing
git rebase
while staying in Branch1 will rewrite Branch1 history to have Branch1's changes on top of those copied from Branch2. That will result in the following commit order,a - b - f - g - c' - d' - e'
.