ChatGPT解决这个技术问题 Extra ChatGPT

Field 'browser' doesn't contain a valid alias configuration

I've started using webpack2 (to be precise, v2.3.2) and after re-creating my config I keep running into an issue I can't seem to solve I get (sorry in advance for ugly dump):

ERROR in ./src/main.js
Module not found: Error: Can't resolve 'components/DoISuportIt' in '[absolute path to my repo]/src'
resolve 'components/DoISuportIt' in '[absolute path to my repo]/src'
  Parsed request is a module
  using description file: [absolute path to my repo]/package.json (relative path: ./src)
    Field 'browser' doesn't contain a valid alias configuration
    aliased with mapping 'components': '[absolute path to my repo]/src/components' to '[absolute path to my repo]/src/components/DoISuportIt'
      using description file: [absolute path to my repo]/package.json (relative path: ./src)
        Field 'browser' doesn't contain a valid alias configuration
      after using description file: [absolute path to my repo]/package.json (relative path: ./src)
        using description file: [absolute path to my repo]/package.json (relative path: ./src/components/DoISuportIt)
          as directory
            [absolute path to my repo]/src/components/DoISuportIt doesn't exist
          no extension
            Field 'browser' doesn't contain a valid alias configuration
            [absolute path to my repo]/src/components/DoISuportIt doesn't exist
          .js
            Field 'browser' doesn't contain a valid alias configuration
            [absolute path to my repo]/src/components/DoISuportIt.js doesn't exist
          .jsx
            Field 'browser' doesn't contain a valid alias configuration
            [absolute path to my repo]/src/components/DoISuportIt.jsx doesn't exist
[[absolute path to my repo]/src/components/DoISuportIt]
[[absolute path to my repo]/src/components/DoISuportIt]
[[absolute path to my repo]/src/components/DoISuportIt.js]
[[absolute path to my repo]/src/components/DoISuportIt.jsx]

package.json

{
  "version": "1.0.0",
  "main": "./src/main.js",
  "scripts": {
    "build": "webpack --progress --display-error-details"
  },
  "devDependencies": {
    ...
  },
  "dependencies": {
    ...
  }
}

In terms of the browser field it's complaining about, the documentation I've been able to find on this is: package-browser-field-spec. There is also webpack documentation for it, but it seems to have it turned on by default: aliasFields: ["browser"]. I tried adding a browser field to my package.json but that didn't seem to do any good.

webpack.config.js

import path from 'path';
const source = path.resolve(__dirname, 'src');

export default {
  context: __dirname,
  entry: './src/main.js',
  output: {
    path: path.resolve(__dirname, 'dist'),
    filename: '[name].js',
  },
  resolve: {
    alias: {
      components: path.resolve(__dirname, 'src/components'),
    },
    extensions: ['.js', '.jsx'],
  },
  module: {
    rules: [
      {
        test: /\.(js|jsx)$/,
        include: source,
        use: {
          loader: 'babel-loader',
          query: {
            cacheDirectory: true,
          },
        },
      },
      {
        test: /\.css$/,
        include: source,
        use: [
          { loader: 'style-loader' },
          {
            loader: 'css-loader',
            query: {
              importLoader: 1,
              localIdentName: '[path]___[name]__[local]___[hash:base64:5]',
              modules: true,
            },
          },
        ],
      },
    ],
  },
};

src/main.js

import DoISuportIt from 'components/DoISuportIt';

src/components/DoISuportIt/index.jsx

export default function() { ... }

For completeness, .babelrc

{
  "presets": [
    "latest",
    "react"
  ],
  "plugins": [
    "react-css-modules"
  ],
  "env": {
    "production": {
      "compact": true,
      "comments": false,
      "minified": true
    }
  },
  "sourceMaps": true
}

What am I doing wrong/missing?

I love all the "in my case" answers. Just goes to show how terrible of a tool Webpack still is. Imagine returning a single generic error for various "in my case" scenarios!
I still don't understand Webpack after years of using it

M
Matthew Herbst

Turned out to be an issue with Webpack just not resolving an import - talk about horrible horrible error messages :(

// I Had to change:
import DoISuportIt from 'components/DoISuportIt';

// to (notice the missing `./`)
import DoISuportIt from './components/DoISuportIt';

Is the issue caused by npm ? Today I upgraded a module using npm, by uninstalling and installing a latest version of module, Now I got this error and the error tells to change the relative location of module, but the list of files is bit high, what caused all these files to change its relative position?
This also saved my ass. It's somewhat counter intuitive that in the sass files you can import with 'folder' but in .js files you need to do it like './folder' . Also without --display-error-details there's NO error message what so ever, it just crashes
@Matthew Herbst one of the stupidest error messages:) my ass is saved, thx!
This is insane.
Still in almost 2022 in webpack 5 the same terrible error messages. No progress from v4 to v5 in thi way?
F
Furman

Just for record, because I had similiar problem, and maybe this answer will help someone: in my case I was using library which was using .js files and I didn't had such extension in webpack resolve extensions. Adding proper extension fixed problem:

module.exports = {
(...)
  resolve: {
    extensions: ['.ts', '.js'],
  }
}

m
messerbill

I'm building a React server-side renderer and found this can also occur when building a separate server config from scratch. If you're seeing this error, try the following:

Make sure your entry value is properly pathed relative to your context value. Mine was missing the preceeding ./ before the entry file name. Make sure you have your resolve value included. Your imports on anything in node_modules will default to looking in your context folder, otherwise.

Example:

const serverConfig = {
name: 'server',
context: path.join(__dirname, 'src'),
entry: {serverEntry: ['./server-entry.js']},
output: {
    path: path.join(__dirname, 'public'),
    filename: 'server.js',
    publicPath: 'public/',
    libraryTarget: 'commonjs2'
},
module: {
    rules: [/*...*/]
},
resolveLoader: {
    modules: [
        path.join(__dirname, 'node_modules')
    ]
},
resolve: {
    modules: [
        path.join(__dirname, 'node_modules')
    ]
}
};

b
baltzar

I had the same issue, but mine was because of wrong casing in path:

// Wrong - uppercase C in /pathCoordinate/
./path/pathCoordinate/pathCoordinateForm.component

// Correct - lowercase c in /pathcoordinate/
./path/pathcoordinate/pathCoordinateForm.component

B
Ben Smith

I encountered this error in a TypeScript project. In my webpack.config.js file I was only resolving TypeScript files i.e.

resolve: {
    extensions: [".ts"],
}

However I noticed that the node_module which was causing the error:

Field 'browser' doesn't contain a valid alias configuration

did not have any ".ts" files (which is understandable as the module has been converted to vanilla JS. Doh!).

So to fix the issue I updated the resolve declaration to:

resolve: {
    extensions: [".ts", ".js"],
}

You can also use "..." at the end of extensions to include the defaults.
P
Paul Roub

Add this to your package.json:

"browser": {
  "[module-name]": false   
},

i coder should read the documentation first, i always search in stackoverflow but nowadays i prefer to read documentation first. thanks for editing...
I have solved the problem with the main.js, neverthless I have the next error: Error during loading: Uncaught TypeError: fs.existsSync is not a function in localhost:9876/_karma_webpack_/vendor.js line 110252 Do you have any idea about this?
@kimo_ouz - Absolutely brilliant! Thank you for introducing me to the "browser" field world. Here are some links for other interested people: insides of the webpack-package.json relationship and NPM official notes
T
TNT

In my case it was a package that was installed as a dependency in package.json with a relative path like this:

"dependencies": {
  ...
  "phoenix_html": "file:../deps/phoenix_html"
},

and imported in js/app.js with import "phoenix_html"

This had worked but after an update of node, npm, etc... it failed with the above error-message.

Changing the import line to import "../../deps/phoenix_html" fixed it.


Oh no, why Webpack is so unintuitive at this, your thoughts? I also have local dependency.
A
Abraham Jagadeesh

Changed my entry to

entry: path.resolve(__dirname, './src/js/index.js'),

and it worked.


G
Good Night Nerd Pride

My case was rather embarrassing: I added a typescript binding for a JS library without adding the library itself.

So if you do:

npm install --save @types/lucene

Don't forget to do:

npm install --save lucene

Kinda obvious, but I just totally forgot and that cost me quite some time.


E
EvgenyKolyakov

This also occurs when the webpack.config.js is simply missing (dockerignore 🤦‍♂️)


when running npm run build i had to modify the build script in package.json to reference the correct webpack configuration file "build": "webpack --mode production --config webpack/webpack.config.prod.js";
o
olivier

For anyone building an ionic app and trying to upload it. Make sure you added at least one platform to the app. Otherwise you will get this error.


c
codejockie

In my experience, this error was as a result of improper naming of aliases in Webpack. In that I had an alias named redux and webpack tried looking for the redux that comes with the redux package in my alias path.

To fix this, I had to rename the alias to something different like Redux.


l
luiscla27

In my case, it was due to a broken symlink when trying to npm link a custom angular library to consuming app. After running npm link @authoring/canvas

"@authoring/canvas": "path/to/ui-authoring-canvas/dist"

It appear everything was OK but the module still couldn't be found:

https://i.stack.imgur.com/8f9YU.png

When I corrected the import statement to something that the editor could find Link:

import {CirclePackComponent} from '@authoring/canvas/lib/circle-pack/circle-pack.component';

I received this which is mention in the overflow thread:

https://i.stack.imgur.com/wWIYx.png

To fix this I had to:

cd /usr/local/lib/node_modules/packageName cd .. rm -rf packageName In the root directory of the library, run:

a) rm -rf dist
b) npm run build
c) cd dist 
d) npm link

In the consuming app, update the package.json with:

"packageName": "file:/path/to/local/node_module/packageName""

In the root directory of the consuming app run npm link packageName


l
luiscla27

In my case, to the very end of the webpack.config.js, where I should exports the config, there was a typo: export(should be exports), which led to failure with loading webpack.config.js at all.

const path = require('path');

const config = {
    mode: 'development',
    entry: "./lib/components/Index.js",
    output: {
        path: path.resolve(__dirname, 'public'),
        filename: 'bundle.js'
    },
    module: {
        rules: [
            {
                test: /\.js$/,
                loader: 'babel-loader',
                exclude: path.resolve(__dirname, "node_modules")
            }
        ]
    }
}

// pay attention to "export!s!" here
module.exports = config;

F
FAndrew

In my case, I imported library files like:

import { MyFile } from "my-library/public-api";

After I removed the public-api from the import everything worked fine:

import { MyFile } from "my-library";

MyFile is exported in the public-api file in the library.


z
zemil

I had aliases into tsconfig.json:

{
    "compilerOptions": {
        "paths": {
            "@store/*": ["./src/store/*"]
        }
    },
}

So I solved this issue by adding aliases to webpack.config also:

module.exports = {
  //...
  resolve: {
    alias: {
      '@store': path.resolve(__dirname, '../src/store'),
    },
  },
};

a
alex351

For everyone with Ionic: Updating to the latest @ionic/app-scripts version gave a better error message.

npm install @ionic/app-scripts@latest --save-dev

It was a wrong path for styleUrls in a component to a non-existing file. Strangely it gave no error in development.


d
dxhans5

In my situation, I did not have an export at the bottom of my webpack.config.js file. Simply adding

export default Config;

solved it.


w
wltheng

In my case, it is due to a case-sensitivity typo in import path. For example,

Should be:

import Dashboard from './Dashboard/dashboard';

Instead of:

import Dashboard from './Dashboard/Dashboard';

A
AmirHossein Rezaei

In my case I was using invalid templateUrl.By correcting it problem solved.

@Component({
        selector: 'app-edit-feather-object',
        templateUrl: ''
    })

J
Jadamae77

I am using single-spa, and encountered this issue with the error

Module not found: Error: Can't resolve '/builds/**/**/src\main.single-spa.ts' in /builds/**/**'

I eventually figured out that in angular.json build options "main" was set to src\\main.single-spa.ts. Changing it to src/main.single-spa.ts fixed it.

https://i.stack.imgur.com/zLKtt.png


A
Avinash

Had the same issue with angular was importing

import { Injectable } from "@angular/core/core";

changed it to

import { Injectable } from "@angular/core";

A
Ankur Marwaha

For me the issue was, I was importing

.ts files into .js files

changing them to ts as well solved the issue.


M
Mostafa Armandi

In my case, I had a mixture of enum and interface in the index.d.ts file.
I extracted enums into another file and the issue resolved.


W
William Nicholson

In my case, I was getting this error: (I am using webpack 5 with React v18 and React Router v6)

ERROR in ./src/components/App/App.jsx 5:0-42
Module not found: Error: Can't resolve '../../Pages/Profile' in 'C:\Users\nicho\Desktop\projects\webpack-starter-with-react\src\components\App'  
resolve '../../Pages/Profile' in 'C:\Users\nicho\Desktop\projects\webpack-starter-with-react\src\components\App'
  using description file: C:\Users\nicho\Desktop\projects\webpack-starter-with-react\package.json (relative path: ./src/components/App)
    Field 'browser' doesn't contain a valid alias configuration
    using description file: C:\Users\nicho\Desktop\projects\webpack-starter-with-react\package.json (relative path: ./src/Pages/Profile)
      no extension
        Field 'browser' doesn't contain a valid alias configuration
        C:\Users\nicho\Desktop\projects\webpack-starter-with-react\src\Pages\Profile doesn't exist
      .js
        Field 'browser' doesn't contain a valid alias configuration
        C:\Users\nicho\Desktop\projects\webpack-starter-with-react\src\Pages\Profile.js doesn't exist
      .json
        Field 'browser' doesn't contain a valid alias configuration
        C:\Users\nicho\Desktop\projects\webpack-starter-with-react\src\Pages\Profile.json doesn't exist
      .wasm
        Field 'browser' doesn't contain a valid alias configuration
        C:\Users\nicho\Desktop\projects\webpack-starter-with-react\src\Pages\Profile.wasm doesn't exist
      as directory
        C:\Users\nicho\Desktop\projects\webpack-starter-with-react\src\Pages\Profile doesn't exist
 @ ./src/index.js 3:0-43 5:46-49

webpack 5.72.1 compiled with 3 errors in 1872 ms

Adding the file extension to the module import fixed this for me:

from this:

import Home from '../../Pages/Home'

to this:

import Home from '../../Pages/Home.jsx'

If you are using Babel you shouldn't have to do include file extensions here. Instead, add them as part of the test field in your Webpack babel-loader rule: test: /\.(js|jsx|ts|tsx)$/,
Hi Matthew, this was already configured.
Y
Yogesh Kumar Gupta

In my case, entry field was missing under module.exports in webpack.config.js, causing this issue.


H
Hari Krishnan

In my case,

I have mistakenly removed a library ("mini-create-react-context") from package.json. I added that back, and did yarn install and build the app and it start working properly. So please take a look at your package.json file once.


A
Abeer Sul

I'm using "@google-cloud/translate": "^5.1.4" and was truggling with this issue, until I tried this:

I opened google-gax\build\src\operationsClient.js file and changed

const configData = require('./operations_client_config');

to

const configData = require('./operations_client_config.json');

which solved the error

ERROR in ./node_modules/google-gax/build/src/operationsClient.js Module not found: Error: Can't resolve './operations_client_config' in 'C:\..\Projects\qaymni\node_modules\google-gax\build\src' resolve './operations_client_config' ......

I hope it helps someone


V
Volkan Paksoy

My case was similar to @witheng's answer.

At some point, I noticed some casing error in some file names in my development environment. For example the file name was

type.ts

and I renamed it to

Type.ts

In my Mac dev environment this didn't register as a change in git so this change didn't go to source control.

In the Linux-based build machine where the filenames are case-sensitive it wasn't able to find the file with different casing.

To avoid issues like this in the future, I ran this command in the repo:

git config core.ignorecase false

Volkan, how can I get in touch with you? You website has no email on it. Want to ask a question about one of your blog posts, namely volkanpaksoy.com/archive/2018/12/19/…
@RobertBenedetto Probably easiest and most efficient way would be asking it here (or another StackExchange site if it's more relevant to your question) and post the link here. Then not only I can take a look but you'd probably get faster and better help from the entire community.
True. I'll do that. However, was just going to ask you to update it since the procedure for step 5 seems to have changed, and ask if there is any way to do step 6 using the AWS management site? I'm pretty entry level with AWS, and those two steps are very confusing.
It's been a while since I published that post and I don't really using EC2 instances at the moment. I wasn't aware of the changes. Hope somebody will be able to weigh in with the latest information. Have you also checked out the links in the resources section? If the resources in that post updated maybe you can get the latest info from them as well.
S
Sauce

I was getting this error when running a GitHub action. The issue was because I'd listed the package as a peer dependency instead of a dependency.

Since I'm using Rollup, the solution was to install the package both as a peer dependency and a dev dependency, and use rollup-plugin-peer-deps-external to remove the dev dependency from the final build.


关注公众号,不定期副业成功案例分享
Follow WeChat

Success story sharing

Want to stay one step ahead of the latest teleworks?

Subscribe Now