ChatGPT解决这个技术问题 Extra ChatGPT

Can I use CASE statement in a JOIN condition?

The following image is a part of Microsoft SQL Server 2008 R2 System Views. From the image we can see that the relationship between sys.partitions and sys.allocation_units depends on the value of sys.allocation_units.type. So to join them together I would write something similar to this:

SELECT  *
FROM    sys.indexes i
        JOIN sys.partitions p
            ON i.index_id = p.index_id 
        JOIN sys.allocation_units a
            ON CASE
               WHEN a.type IN (1, 3)
                   THEN a.container_id = p.hobt_id 
               WHEN a.type IN (2)
                   THEN a.container_id = p.partition_id
               END 

But the upper code gives a syntax error. I guess that's because of the CASE statement. Can anyone help to explain a little?

Add error message:

Msg 102, Level 15, State 1, Line 6 Incorrect syntax near '='.

https://i.stack.imgur.com/HYmiS.jpg

What software did you use to make this beautiful DB diagram?
@LearnByReading did you ever find out which software was used?
@User632716 no unfortunately not!
@User632716 Although I really think it was MySQL Workbench. But I never received a response
@LearnByReading I have no idea. It's provided by Microsoft.

H
HABO

A CASE expression returns a value from the THEN portion of the clause. You could use it thusly:

SELECT  * 
FROM    sys.indexes i 
    JOIN sys.partitions p 
        ON i.index_id = p.index_id  
    JOIN sys.allocation_units a 
        ON CASE 
           WHEN a.type IN (1, 3) AND a.container_id = p.hobt_id THEN 1
           WHEN a.type IN (2) AND a.container_id = p.partition_id THEN 1
           ELSE 0
           END = 1

Note that you need to do something with the returned value, e.g. compare it to 1. Your statement attempted to return the value of an assignment or test for equality, neither of which make sense in the context of a CASE/THEN clause. (If BOOLEAN was a datatype then the test for equality would make sense.)


@HABO thanks that worked for me...but the problem is when i do this the conditions make a fall through...please tell me how do i break it?
@SagarTandel - Sorry, I don't understand "make a fall through" and "how do I break it". Could you clarify your comment? (Recently surfaced from a dive off Saba. Might be the Nitrox.)
It checks for all of the conditions which i don't want. I want it to quit the case once it matches a condition.
@SagarTandel - From MSDN: "The CASE statement evaluates its conditions sequentially and stops with the first condition whose condition is satisfied.". If you want all of the joined rows that don't match any of the explicitly stated conditions, just change the tail end from = 1 to = 0, but I don't think you'll like the result.
JOIN sys.allocation_units a ON CASE WHEN a.type IN (1, 3) AND a.container_id = p.hobt_id THEN 1 WHEN a.type IN (2) AND a.container_id = p.partition_id THEN 1 ELSE 0 END = 1 could you write it in Entity framework the above of your solution
C
Community

Instead, you simply JOIN to both tables, and in your SELECT clause, return data from the one that matches:

I suggest you to go through this link Conditional Joins in SQL Server and T-SQL Case Statement in a JOIN ON Clause

e.g.

    SELECT  *
FROM    sys.indexes i
        JOIN sys.partitions p
            ON i.index_id = p.index_id 
        JOIN sys.allocation_units a
            ON a.container_id =
            CASE
               WHEN a.type IN (1, 3)
                   THEN  p.hobt_id 
               WHEN a.type IN (2)
                   THEN p.partition_id
               END 

Edit: As per comments.

You can not specify the join condition as you are doing.. Check the query above that have no error. I have take out the common column up and the right column value will be evaluated on condition.


what conditional join means? Each join (excluding cross) is a conditional. How this case is different from any other? Your sample has inner join with condition, as well as OPs query has join with condition.
@zerkms: I agree, it sounds confusing. I believe, a conditional join in this context means a join whose condition depends on another condition.
@Andriy M: any reason to think of another term for trivial condition with OR?
@zerkms: Er, yes, it's because it sounds confusing. :) But I believe you meant to ask if there was any reason not think of another term, in which case I cannot be sure. If you are asking for my reasons, well, I think I just couldn't be bothered enough. :) How about a join with alternate conditions? I'm afraid I'm not very good at coining terms. Note, though, that conceptually this is about "conditional condition", not about "condition with OR". Using OR is merely one way of implementing it.
@Andriy M: ok. But personally I still don't see the reason to give a name for the trivial condition with 1 OR and 2 ANDs or with 1 CASE. It is a routine query that has nothing that differs it from any other.
r
richardtallent

Try this:

...JOIN sys.allocation_units a ON 
  (a.type=2 AND a.container_id = p.partition_id)
  OR (a.type IN (1, 3) AND a.container_id = p.hobt_id)

Even though it would work - the query in the question looks perfectly valid. So still doesn't explain what's wrong with OP's code
S
Suraj Rao

I think you need two case statements:

SELECT  *
FROM    sys.indexes i
    JOIN sys.partitions p
        ON i.index_id = p.index_id 
    JOIN sys.allocation_units a
        ON 
        -- left side of join on statement
            CASE
               WHEN a.type IN (1, 3)
                   THEN a.container_id
               WHEN a.type IN (2)
                   THEN a.container_id
            END 
        = 
        -- right side of join on statement
            CASE
               WHEN a.type IN (1, 3)
                   THEN p.hobt_id
               WHEN a.type IN (2)
                   THEN p.partition_id
            END             

This is because:

the CASE statement returns a single value at the END

the ON statement compares two values

your CASE statement was doing the comparison inside of the CASE statement. I would guess that if you put your CASE statement in your SELECT you would get a boolean '1' or '0' indicating whether the CASE statement evaluated to True or False


S
Stefan Gabor

Yes, you can. Here is an example.

SELECT a.*
FROM TableA a
LEFT OUTER JOIN TableB j1 ON  (CASE WHEN LEN(COALESCE(a.NoBatiment, '')) = 3 
                                THEN RTRIM(a.NoBatiment) + '0' 
                                ELSE a.NoBatiment END ) = j1.ColumnName 

While this code may solve the question, including an explanation of how and why this solves the problem would really help to improve the quality of your post, and probably result in more up-votes. Remember that you are answering the question for readers in the future, not just the person asking now. Please edit your answer to add explanations and give an indication of what limitations and assumptions apply.
R
Rutek

I took your example and edited it:

SELECT  *
FROM    sys.indexes i
    JOIN sys.partitions p
        ON i.index_id = p.index_id 
    JOIN sys.allocation_units a
        ON a.container_id = (CASE
           WHEN a.type IN (1, 3)
               THEN p.hobt_id 
           WHEN a.type IN (2)
               THEN p.partition_id
           ELSE NULL
           END)

佚名

This seems nice

https://bytes.com/topic/sql-server/answers/881862-joining-different-tables-based-condition

FROM YourMainTable
LEFT JOIN AirportCity DepCity ON @TravelType = 'A' and DepFrom =  DepCity.Code
LEFT JOIN AirportCity DepCity ON @TravelType = 'B' and SomeOtherColumn = SomeOtherColumnFromSomeOtherTable

Trying this I'm getting an error: The correlation name 'xx' is specified multiple times in a FROM clause.
d
double-beep

Here I have compared the difference in two different result sets:

SELECT main.ColumnName, compare.Value PreviousValue,  main.Value CurrentValue
FROM 
(
    SELECT 'Name' AS ColumnName, 'John' as Value UNION ALL
    SELECT 'UserName' AS ColumnName, 'jh001' as Value UNION ALL
    SELECT 'Department' AS ColumnName, 'HR' as Value UNION ALL
    SELECT 'Phone' AS ColumnName, NULL as Value UNION ALL
    SELECT 'DOB' AS ColumnName, '1993-01-01' as Value UNION ALL
    SELECT 'CreateDate' AS ColumnName, '2017-01-01' as Value UNION ALL
    SELECT 'IsActive' AS ColumnName, '1' as Value
) main
INNER JOIN
(
    SELECT 'Name' AS ColumnName, 'Rahul' as Value UNION ALL
    SELECT 'UserName' AS ColumnName, 'rh001' as Value UNION ALL
    SELECT 'Department' AS ColumnName, 'HR' as Value UNION ALL
    SELECT 'Phone' AS ColumnName, '01722112233' as Value UNION ALL
    SELECT 'DOB' AS ColumnName, '1993-01-01' as Value UNION ALL
    SELECT 'CreateDate' AS ColumnName, '2017-01-01' as Value UNION ALL
    SELECT 'IsActive' AS ColumnName, '1' as Value
) compare
ON main.ColumnName = compare.ColumnName AND
CASE 
    WHEN main.Value IS NULL AND compare.Value IS NULL THEN 0
    WHEN main.Value IS NULL AND compare.Value IS NOT NULL THEN 1
    WHEN main.Value IS NOT NULL AND compare.Value IS NULL THEN 1
    WHEN main.Value <> compare.Value THEN 1
END = 1 

T
Tone Škoda

There are at least 2 ways to join based on condition. One is faster than the other:

declare @loopZaKosovnice int = 1
select * 
from tHE_MoveItem mi 
left join tHE_SetProdSt st on st.acIdent = mi.acIdent

-- slow
--join the_setitem si on si.acident = case when @loopZaKosovnice = 0 then mi.acident else st.acIdentChild end 

-- two times as fast
left join the_setitem si1 on @loopZaKosovnice = 0 and si1.acident = mi.acident
left join the_setitem si2 on @loopZaKosovnice = 1 and si2.acident = st.acIdentChild
join the_setitem si on si.acident = isnull (si1.acident, si2.acIdent)

S
Suraj Rao

Took DonkeyKong's example.

The issue is I needed to use a declared variable. This allows for stating your left and right-hand side of what you need to compare. This is for supporting an SSRS report where different fields must be linked based on the selection by the user.

The initial case sets the field choice based on the selection and then I can set the field I need to match on for the join.

A second case statement could be added for the right-hand side if the variable is needed to choose from different fields

LEFT OUTER JOIN Dashboard_Group_Level_Matching ON
       case
         when @Level  = 'lvl1' then  cw.Lvl1
         when @Level  = 'lvl2' then  cw.Lvl2
         when @Level  = 'lvl3' then  cw.Lvl3
       end
    = Dashboard_Group_Level_Matching.Dashboard_Level_Name